Skip to main content

Can Globality Bring a Good Society?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

Is globalization a good thing? For its proponents, this contemporary social trend has opened the way variously to worldwide liberal democracy, huge efficiency gains, enhanced consumer satisfaction, increased environmental consciousness, enabled greater intercultural communication, and brought an end to warfare. In contrast, critics have faulted contemporary globalization for in one way and another impeding democracy, imposing a post-colonial imperialism, deepening social inequalities, suppressing vulnerable cultures, undermining every fabric of community, massively aggravating ecological degradation, and compromising every claim to knowledge. With such claims and counterclaims, the stakes in globalization debates are clearly high. The arguments can understandably become passionate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. C. Gamble, Timewalkers: The Prehistory of Global Colonization (Cheltenham: Alan Sutton, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cf. P. Hirst and G. Thompson, Globalization in Question: The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance (Cambridge: Polity, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Wade, ‘Globalization and Its Limits: Reports of the Death of the National Economy Are Greatly Exaggerated’, in S. Berger and R. Dore (eds), National Diversity and Global Capitalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996): 60–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Robertson, Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage, 1992): 58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. W. Shakespeare, A Midsummer Nights Dream (London: Methuen, 1979 [1595–6]): 38;

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Hancock, Citizens of the World: London Merchants and the Integration of the British Atlantic Community, 1735–1785 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Union of International Associations, Yearbook of International Organizations 1997/98, Volume I (Munich: Saur, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. W. E. Connolly, ‘Democracy and Territoriality’, Millennium, 20 (1991): 463–84;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. B. J. Walker, ‘On the Spatiotemporal Conditions of Democratic Practice’, Alternatives, 16 (1991): 243–62;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Held, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge: Polity, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1997 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997): 9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cf. J. Agnew, ‘Global Hegemony versus National Economy: The United States in the New World Order’, in G. J. Demko and W. B. Woods (eds), Reordering the World: Geopolitical Perspectives on the Twenty-First Century (Boulder: Westview, 1994): 270–1;

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Ghai, ‘Structural Adjustment, Global Integration and Social Democracy’, in R. Prendergast and F. Stewart (eds), Market Forces and World Development (New York: St Martin’s, 1994): 30–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. B. Einhorn, Cinderella Goes to Market: Citizenship, Gender and Women’s Movements in East Central Europe (London: Verso, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Sparr (ed.), Mortgaging Women’s Lives: Feminist Critiques of Structural Adjustment (London: Zed, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cf. A. A. Mazrui, ‘Global Apartheid: Structural and Overt’, Alternatives, 19 (Spring, 1994): 185–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Harrod, Labour and Third World Debt (Brussels: International Federation of Chemical, Energy and General Workers’ Unions, 1992): 106.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Myers, Ultimate Security: The Environmental Basis of Political Stability (New York: Norton, 1993): 179;

    Google Scholar 

  19. German Advisory Council on Global Change, World in Transition: The Threat to Soils. 1994 Annual Report (Bonn: Economica, 1995): 32.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage, 1992 [1986]): 166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scholte, J.A. (2000). Can Globality Bring a Good Society?. In: Aulakh, P.S., Schechter, M.G. (eds) Rethinking Globalization(s). International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62425-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62425-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62427-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62425-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics