Abstract
Most contemporary discourses on globalization are articulated around the increasing role of transnational (or multinational) corporations (TNCs) in overseeing national and cross-national economic activities. Policies and practices of TNCs are linked to neo- or Coca-colonization, homogenization of cultural practices, and the decline of the nation-state, among others, and explained at least in part by evolving communications technologies and the related acceleration in speed and ease of transnational financial flows.1 Even political, social, and cultural reactions/resistance to globalization at local levels are posited as oppositional to the homogenizing consequences of the rise of transnational firms.2 While transnational firms, primarily originating from the Triad region (comprising North America, Western Europe and Japan) have, in recent years, increased their share in managing world trade (partially due to the privatization and liberalization of individual country markets),3 the cultural/economic homogenizing consequences of their activities have been debated in the business discipline for almost three decades, before other disciplinary scholars began to examine globalization, much less take note of writings of those in the field of international business or, more generally those outside their own fields of inquiry.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Some of the representative works are: Samuel Huntington, ‘The West: Unique, Not Universal’, Foreign Affairs (Nov-Dec, 1996): 28–46; Lisa Lowe and David Lloyd (eds), The Politics of Culture in the Shadow of Capital (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997);
Masoa Miyoshi, ‘A Borderless World? From Colonialism to Transnationalism and the Decline of the Nation-State’, in Rob Wilson and Wimal Dissanayake (eds), Global/Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996): 78–106.
See, for example, Ann Cvetkovich and Douglas Kellner (eds), Articulating the Global and the Local: Globalization and Cultural Studies (Boulder: Westview Press, 1997); Wilson and Dissanayake (eds), Global/Local; Lowe and Lloyd (eds), Politics of Culture in the Shadow of Capital
Some of the salient examples of early social science and cultural studies writings on the topic include Ronald Robertson and Mike Featherstone’s publications in the 1980s and early 1990s in Theory, Culture and Society. See, for examples, Volume 7, issue 2/3. See also: Ronald Robertson and Frank J. Lechner, ‘Modernization, Globalization and the Problem of Culture in World-Systems Theory’, Theory, Culture & Society, 3 (1985): 103–18,
and Mike Featherstone, ‘Consumer Culture, Symbolic Power and Universalism’, in G. Stauth and S. Zubaida (eds), Mass Culture, Popular Culture and Social Life in the Middle East (Boulder: Westview Press, 1987).
John Fayerweather, International Business Management: A Conceptual Framework (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969): 133.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Preet S. Aulakh and Michael G. Schechter
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aulakh, P.S., Schechter, M.G. (2000). The Multidimensionality of Globalization: A Critical Perspective. In: Aulakh, P.S., Schechter, M.G. (eds) Rethinking Globalization(s). International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62425-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62425-6_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62427-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62425-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)