Abstract
Imagine that it is 1962, you are in the Cavern, the Beatles are playing and you are hearing — for the first time — ‘Love Me Do’. The quality of the group’s PA system means that the only words you are sure you understand are those in the title. But that doesn’t matter; the song has an overall effect on you as a performance, in which lyrical detail is not important. Later that year, you buy the single and soon you can sing all the words along with the group. But you don’t give the words any close, reflective consideration, because it’s not that kind of song. Jump now to 1967, where you and your friends have been listening to ‘A Day In The Life’. Like everyone else, you have only heard it on disc, because the song is never performed live. Not only are the words clearer, they are also printed out for you to follow on the record cover. As the song finishes, someone says, ‘What do you think it’s about?’and everyone has an opinion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carroll, Joseph (1995) Evolution and Literary Theory. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Cook, Guy (1992) The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge.
Cook, Guy (1994) Discourse and Literature. Oxford University Press.
Dunbar, Robin (1996) Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. London: Faber.
Grice, H. Paul (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’ in P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Inglis, Ian (1997) ‘Variations on a Theme: the Love Songs of the Beatles’, International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music. 28(1): 37–62.
Louw, Bill (1993) ‘Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies’ in M. Baker, G. Francis and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Robertson, John (1994) The Complete Guide to the Music of the Beatles. London: Omnibus.
Cone 1.71 (1992) Concordance Generating Program Version 1.71 Beta. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Wegerif, Rupert and Neil Mercer (1997) ‘Using Computer-Based Text Analysis to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research on Collaborative Learning’, Language and Education, 11(3): 271–86.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2000 Guy Cook and Neil Mercer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cook, G., Mercer, N. (2000). From Me to You: Austerity to Profligacy in the Language of the Beatles. In: Inglis, I. (eds) The Beatles, Popular Music and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62210-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62210-8_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-312-22236-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-62210-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)