The two previous chapters dealt with the cold war obsession of U.S. nuclear planners—the (former) Soviet nuclear and conventional threat. In this chapter, our study turns its attention to the chief concern of post-cold war U.S. military strategy: regional contingencies. Regional challengers outside Europe pose a growing threat to the United States. Some have or may someday have nuclear weapons; others have substantial conventional forces; still others are developing ballistic and cruise missiles of steadily increasing range and accuracy. Several have nationalistic, ideological, or religious motives to undermine U.S. allies and interests.
KeywordsEurope Posit Egypt Boulder Stake
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.See Michael J. Mazarr, James A. Blackwell, and Don M. Snider, Desert Storm: The Gulf War and What We Learned (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1993), chapter 7.Google Scholar
- 3.See McGeorge Bundy, “Nuclear Weapons and the Gulf,” Foreign Affairs 70 (Fall 1991): 83–94.Google Scholar
- 6.See Thomas W. Dowler and Joseph S. Howard, “Countering the Threat of the Weil-Armed Tyrant: A Modest Proposal for Small Nuclear Weapons,” Strategic Review 19 (Fall 1991): 34–40.Google Scholar
- 7.Various proposals have been made in the UN Conference on Disarmament to ban any use, or the first use, of nuclear weapons; see Thomas Bernauer, Nuclear Issues on the Agenda of the Conference on Disarmament (Geneva and New York: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1991), pp. 12–14. None of these, however, apparently contains any explicit enforcement provisions.Google Scholar