Laboratory Testing and Risk Classification

  • Richard E Braun

Abstract

Historically, insurers in North America have been collecting and analyzing urine specimens form proposed insureds since the early 1900s. In this manner, they identified unknown or unreported diabetes and renal diseases — thereby allowing the more accurate classification of risk. Much later, blood testing was added to identify earlier stages of glucose intolerance, liver disease, renal disease, antibodies to HIV, and lipid abnormalities. More recently, oral fluid testing was developed to test for HIV antibodies, cocaine, and cotinine. As insurance policy design has evolved with different premium rates for tobacco and non-tobacco users and preferred risk categories, laboratory testing has assumed a greater role in the classification of risk.

Keywords

Cholesterol Obesity Hepatitis Creatinine Morphine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sasse EA. In: Kaplan LA, Pesce AJ, Kazmierczak SC (eds). Clinical Chemistry: Theory, Analysis, Correlation. St. Louis, MO, 2003, Mosby.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diamond GA, Forrester JS. Analysis of Probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1979; 300: 1350–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patterson RE et al. Practical diagnosis of coronary disease: a Baye’s Theorem nomogram to correlate clinical data with noninvasive exercise tests. Am J of Cardiol 1984; 53: 252–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith C. Life Insurance Today: An Actuary’s View. J Ins Med 1988; 20: 7–11.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun RE. Screening tests: why, which ones, and when? Med Resource 1990; 2: 4–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bickel C et al. Relation of markers of inflammation (c-reactive protein, fibrinogen, Von Willebrand factor, and leukocyte count) and statin therapy to long-term mortality in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 901–908.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Titcomb C. Protective value holds key to testing issue. Med Resource 2001; 13: 8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bachorik PS et al. In: Henry JB (ed) Clinical Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods. Philadelphia, PA, 2001, W.B. Saunders Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard E Braun

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations