Skip to main content
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

What is the proper role of an economist in a debate about such a politically charged decision as that of the potential entry of the UK into EMU? Fortunately economics itself provides a discipline-neutral framework of analysis in the form of the cost-benefit approach. That approach allows ‘non-economic’ factors to be admitted. If, as many probably think, the balance of purely economic factors is negative or uncertain, it may still be quite reasonable to see positive political benefits justifying entry. It still remains important to examine the economic factors carefully and to think of ways in which costs can be minimised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Artis, M. J. and Zhang, W. (1997) ‘International business cycles and the ERM: is there a European business cycle?’, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M. J. and Zhang, W. (1998a) ‘Core and periphery in EMU: a cluster analysis’, EUI working papers, RSC No. 98/37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M. J. and Zhang, W. (1998b) ‘Membership of EMU: a fuzzy clustering analysis of alternative criteria’, EUI working papers, RSC No. 98/52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artis, M. J. and Zhang, W. (1999) ‘Further evidence on international business cycles and the ERM: is there a European business cycle?’, Oxford Economic Papers, January, 51, 120–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1993) ‘Shocking aspects of European Monetary Integration’, in Torres, F. and Giavazzi, F. (eds) Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1996) ‘Operationalising the theory of Optimal Currency Areas’, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 1484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1997) ‘Even closer to heaven? An optimum-currency-area index for European countries’, European Economic Review, 41: 761–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canzoneri, M., Vinals, J. and Valles, J. (1996) ‘Do exchange rates move to address international macroeconomic imbalances?’ CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 1498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R., Favero, C. and Giavazzi, F. (1998) ‘Immediate challenges for the European Central Bank’, Economic Policy, 26, April: 15–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkel-Rousse, H. and Mélitz, J. (1995) ‘New empirical evidence of the costs of European monetary union’, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 1169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontagné, L. and Freudenberg, M. (1998) ‘Endogenous (a)symmetric shocks in the Monetary Union’, mimeo, CEPII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. and Rose, A. (1997) ‘Is EMU more justifiable ex-post than ex-ante?’ European Economic Review, 41: 753–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J. and Rose, A. (1998) ‘The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria’, Economic Journal, July, 108(449): 1009–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (1997) ‘UK membership of the single currency — an assessment of the Five Economic Tests’, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Select Committee on the Treasury and Civil Service (1998) ‘Report on preparations for Stage Three of Economic and Monetary Union’, vols I–III, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbs, J. (1998) ‘Fluctuations, bilateral trade and the exchange rate regime’, mimeo, University of Lausanne, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. B. (1969) ‘The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view’, in Mundell, R. A. and Swoboda, A. (eds) Problems of the International Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1990). ‘Policy problems of a monetary union,’ in De Grauwe, P. and Papademos, L. (eds) The European Monetary System in the 1990s. London: Longman, pp. 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, R. I. (1963) ‘Optimum currency areas’, American Economic Review, 53 (September) 717–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moggridge, D. E. (1972) British Monetary Policy 1924–31, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. A. (1961) ‘A theory of optimum currency areas’, American Economic Review, 51 (September): 657–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prati, A. and Schinasi, G. (1998) ‘Financial stability in EMU’, IMF Working Papers (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Talani, L. (1998) ‘Interests or expectations? The problem of credibility of the exchange rate policy: an international political economy approach. The cases of Italy and the UK and the departure from the ERM of the EMS’, PhD thesis, European University Institute, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1995) ‘EMU 2000? Prospects for European Monetary Union’, Chatham House Paper, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. (1998) This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Michael Artis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Artis, M. (1999). The UK and EMU. In: Cobham, D., Zis, G. (eds) From EMS to EMU: 1979 to 1999 and Beyond. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27745-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics