Advertisement

Improving Investor Accountability

  • Dominic Ayine
  • Jacob Werksman

Abstract

This chapter explores how international standards, especially those for protecting the environment, may be more effectively enforced, in relation to international economic activity and corporate behaviour. It argues that measures to create more open and competitive world markets, such as the proposed MAI, must be accompanied by arrangements to strengthen the enforcement of environmental standards. Although the international community has made great strides, in the past two decades, in recognizing the importance of the principle of sustainable development, and embodying it in more specific standards, effective enforcement is too often lacking. To a great extent this is because the costs of environmental damage may be external to the firm or state causing it, creating the temptation to free-ride. The consensual nature of international law, and the competitive character of capitalist economic relations, create difficulties for effective enforcement of standards which protect public interests. However, these are certainly not insurmountable. The increased integration of the world economy can and should be accompanied by more effective means for coordinating the enforcement of those standards for environmental protection which are now recognized as essential to ensuring the sustainability of economic development.

Keywords

World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement North American Free Trade Agreement Union Carbide National Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, Michael, R. (1995) ‘Public Interest Perspectives on the Bhopal Case: Tort, Crime or Violation of Human Rights?’ in D. Robinson and J. Dunkley, Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law. Wiley and Chancery, London.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, John, M. (1996) ‘Parent Corporations’ Liability under CERCLA Section 107 for the Environmental Violations of their Subsidiaries’, Tulsa Law Journal, vol. 31, 819.Google Scholar
  3. Cassels, J. (1993) The Uncertain Promise of Law. Lessons from Bhopal. Toronto University Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  4. Fawcett, J. J. (1985) ‘Jurisdiction and Subsidiaries’, Journal of Business Law, 16–25.Google Scholar
  5. Government of Canada Statement on MMT, 20 July 1998, http://www.intrasec.mb.ca.Google Scholar
  6. Kiss, A. and Shelton, D. (1991) International Environmental Law. Graham and Trotman, London.Google Scholar
  7. Lubbe et al. u Cape Plc (1998) Court of Appeal, 30 July.Google Scholar
  8. Muchlinski, P. (1995) Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Muchlinski, P. (1987) ‘The Bhopal Case: Controlling Ultrahazardous Industrial Activities Undertaken by Foreign Investors’, Modern Law Review, vol. 50, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Neff, Alan (1990) ‘Not in Their Backyards, Either: a Proposal for a Foreign Environmental Practices Act’, Ecology Law Quarterly, vol. 17, 477.Google Scholar
  11. Nolan, Matthew and Lippoldt, Darin (1998) ‘Obscure NAFTA Clause Empowers Private Parties’, National Law Journal, 6 April, B8.Google Scholar
  12. Prince, P. (1998) ‘Bhopal, Bougainville and Ok Tedi: Why Australia’s Approach to Forum Non Conveniens is Better’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly vol. 47, 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robbins, Deidre, H. (1995) ‘Public Interest Environmental Litigation in the United States’, in D. Robinson and J. Dunkley, Public Interest Perspectives in Environmental Law. London, Wiley and Chancery.Google Scholar
  14. The Amoco Cadiz’ (1984) 2, Lloyd’s Law Reports 304. US District Court, N. E. Ill.Google Scholar
  15. Yakpo, E. K. M. (1989) ‘Application of Forum Non Conveniens in the United States — Bhopal and its Lessons for Developing Countries’, Revue Africaine de Droit Internationale et Comparé vol. 1, 153.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dominic Ayine and Jacob Werksman 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominic Ayine
  • Jacob Werksman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations