Advertisement

Seeing and Knowing: Science, Pornography and Early Modern Hermaphrodites

  • Ruth Gilbert

Abstract

In Paradise Lost Milton’s Satan confesses an ‘unspeakable desire to see, and know’.1 Satan’s words, which anticipate his voyage into the New World, resonate with a particularly Renaissance excitement about specular exploration and the pursuit of knowledge. However, as St Augustine had already suggested these were potentially dangerous thrills. In the Confessions he meditated upon the temptations aroused by the ‘lust of the eyes’, arguing that such ocular desires were most dangerous when motivated by ‘a relish for investigation and discovery’.2

Keywords

Royal Society Seventeenth Century Philosophical Transaction Sexual Knowledge Sexed Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    John Milton, Paradise Lost, in John Carey and Alastair Fowler (eds), The Poems of John Milton (London: Longman, 1968), II.662.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    St Augustine, Confessions, trans. R. S. Pine-Coffin (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1961), p. 242.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    For a discussion of the epistemophilic drive see Toril Moi, ‘Patriarchal Thought and the Drive for Knowledge’, Teresa Brennan (ed.), in Between Feminism and Psychoanalysis (London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 189–205.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Francis Bacon, The Great Instauration, in James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis and Douglas Denon Heath (eds), The Works of Francis Bacon, 14 vols (London: Longman, 1857–1874), IV, p. 30.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abraham Cowley, ‘To The Royal Society’, in A. R. Waller (ed.), Poems, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 448. Cowley’s ode was originally published with Thomas Sprat’s History of the Royal Society (London, 1667).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robert Hooke, Micrographia: Or some Physiological Descriptions of Minute Bodies made by Magnifying Glasses with Observations and Inquiries thereupon (London, 1665), sig.Av.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    Thomas Sprat, The History of the Royal-Society of London, for the Improving of Natural Knowledge (London, 1667), ‘Epistle Dedicatory’, n.p.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    Thomas Laqueur, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), p. 64.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    For an analysis of some of the issues surrounding the translation of medical texts into the vernacular in the early part of the seventeenth century see H.S. Bennett, English Books and Readers 1475–1640, 3 vols (1970), (Reprinted, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), III, pp. 140–3.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    St Augustine, City of God, translated and edited by Henry Bettenson (1972), (Reprinted, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1984), p. 581.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Augustine, City of God, p. 578. The English definition of the Latin ‘pudendus’ is, ‘of which one ought to be ashamed, shameful, scandalous’. Freud also noted the uncanny function of the ‘heimlich parts of the human body, pudenda’. See Freud, ‘The Uncanny’ (1919), in Art And Literature, Penguin Freud Library, 15 vols (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985), XIV p. 346.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Patricia Crawford notes that ‘from the early to the mid-seventeenth century, especially during the Civil Wars and Interregnum, there was a movement to popularise medical knowledge.’ See ‘Sexual Knowledge in England, 1500–1750’, in Roy Porter and Mikulàs Teich (eds), Sexual Knowledge, Sexual Science: the History of Attitudes to Sexuality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 82–106, quotation, p. 86.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    William Harvey, Anatomical Exercitations Concerning the Generation of Living Creatures (London, 1653), sig. A3.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Helkiah Crooke, Microcosmographia: A Description of the Body of Man (London, 1615), p. 293.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Jane Sharp, The Midwives Book (London, 1671), pp. 41–2.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Edmund Spenser, The Faerie Queene, ed. A. C. Hamilton, (London: Longman, 1977), II.23.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality: an Introduction, trans. Robert Hurley (1976), (Reprinted, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978), p. 57.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    Lynn Hunt, ‘Introduction: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500–1800’, in The Invention of Pornography: Obscenity and the Origins of Modernity, 1500–1800, Lynn Hunt (ed.), (New York: Zone, 1993), pp. 9–45, quotation, p. 11.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    For discussions of early modern pornography, see Roger Thompson, Unfit for Modest Ears: a Study of Pornographic, Obscene and Bawdy Works Written or Published in England in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1979); David Foxon, Libertine Literature in England 1660–1745 (Reprinted with revisions from The Book Collector, 1964); and Peter Wagner, Eros Revived: Erotica of the Enlightenment in England and America (London: Paladin Grafton Books, 1990).Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    See, Peter Wagner, ‘The Discourse on Sex — or Sex as Discourse: Eighteenth-Century Medical and Paramedical Literature’, in G. S. Rousseau and Roy Porter (eds). Sexual Underworlds of the Enlightenment (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987), pp. 46–68.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    See Roy Porter, ‘The Literature of Sexual Advice before 1800’, in Sexual Knowledge, Sexual Science, pp. 134–157.Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    Aristotlés Master-Piece was first published in 1684 was reprinted regularly throughout the eighteenth century. See Roy Porter, ‘“The Secrets of Generation Display’d”: Aristotle’s Masterpiece in Eighteenth-Century England’, in R. F. Macubbin (ed.), Unauthorized Sexual Behaviour During the Enlightenment, (special issue of Eighteenth-Century Life, 1985), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    Anon, Aristotlés Master-Piece or the Secrets of Generation Displayed in all the Parts Thereof (London, 1684), p. 4.Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    Richard Head, Rare Verities: the Cabinet of Venus Unlocked, and Her Secrets Laid Open (London, 1657), sig.A5.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    William Harvey, ‘Preface’, Anatomical Exercitations, Concerning the Generation of Living Creatures (London, 1653), sig.A2v.Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    Jacques Duval, Traité des hermaphrodits, parties gé;nitales, accouchemens des femmes, etc (Rouen, 1612); Gaspard Bauhin, De hermaphroditorum monstrorumque partum natura ex theologorum, jureconsultorum medicorum, philosophorum et rabbinorum sententia libri duo (Oppenheim, 1614); Jean Riolan, Discours sur les hermaphrodits. Ou il est demonstré contre l’opinion commune, qu’il n’y a pont de vrays Hermaphrodits (Paris, 1614).Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    Lorraine Daston and Katharine Park, ‘The Hermaphrodite and the Orders of Nature: Sexual Ambiguity in Early Modern France’, Gay and Lesbian Quarterly, 1 (1995), 419–38, quotation, 422.Google Scholar
  28. 34.
    Antonio Beccadelli, Antonio Beccadelli and the Hermaphrodite, ed. Michael de Cassant, (Liverpool: Janus Press, 1984), I, p. iii.Google Scholar
  29. 35.
    Giles Jacob, Tractatus de Hermaphroditis: Or, A Treatise of Hermaphrodites (London, 1718), sig.B.Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    Thomas Allen, ‘An Exact Narrative of an Hermaphrodite now in London’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1667), no. 32, p. 624. I am grateful to Anthony Archdeacon for his advice on the translation of this letter.Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    John Evelyn, The Diary of John Evelyn, ed. E. S. de Beer, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959), 22 August, 1667, p. 513.Google Scholar
  32. 39.
    A Collection of 77 Advertisements relating to Dwarfs, Giants, and Other Monsters and Curiosities exhibited for Public Inspection (London, 1680–1700), n.p.Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    James Parsons, A Mechanical and Critical Enquiry into the Nature of Hermaphrodites (London, 1741), p. 21.Google Scholar
  34. 41.
    Diemerbroeck describes the hermaphrodite as being English and aged approximately twenty-two in 1668. Isbrand de Diemerbroeck, The Anatomy of Human Bodies, translated by William Salmon (London, 1689), p. 183.Google Scholar
  35. 45.
    Mr Veay, ‘An Extract of a Letter written by Mr. Veay Physician at Toulouse to Mr. de St. Ussans, concerning a very extraordinary Hermaphrodite in that City’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1687), no. 282, pp. 282–3. I am grateful to Jonathan Sawday and Bill Marshall for their advice on the translation of this letter.Google Scholar
  36. 46.
    Edmond Halley, Correspondence and Papers of Edmond Halley, E. F. MacPike (ed.), (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932), 9 April 1687, p. 81.Google Scholar
  37. 48.
    Barthélemy Saviard, (Paris, 1702). Quoted in Pierre Darmon, Trial by Impotence: Virility and Marriage in Pre-Revolutionary France, translated by Paul Keegan (Paris, 1979; London: Chatto and Windus, the Hogarth Press, 1985), p. 50. For a discussion of this and several other case histories of hermaphrodites, see F. Gonzalez-Crussi, ‘Sexual Undifferentiation’, in Three Forms of Sudden Death and Other Reflections on the Grandeur and Misery of the Body (London: Picador, 1986), pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
  38. 49.
    Anon, An Apology for a Latin Verse in Commendation of Mr. MARTEN’S Gonosologium Novum (London, 1709), p. 17. This was written (possibly by John Marten) as a defence of John Marten’s Gonosologium Novum, or a New System of all the Secret Infirmities and Diseases Natural Accidental and Venereal in Men and Women (London, 1708) which had been published as an appendix to his treatise on venereal disease, and was prosecuted for obscenity.Google Scholar
  39. 52.
    A Collection of 77 Advertisements (London, 1680–1700), n.p.Google Scholar
  40. 54.
    For discussions of this issue see Emma Donoghue, Passions Between Women: British Lesbian Culture 1668–1801 (London: Scarlet Press, 1993), pp. 25–53 and Cath Sharrock, ‘Hermaphroditism; or, “the Erection of a New Doctrine”: Theories of Female Sexuality in Eighteenth Century England’, Paragraph, 17 (1994), 38–48.Google Scholar
  41. 55.
    François de Chavigny de la Bretonnière, The Gallant Hermaphrodite, An Amorous Novel (London, 1688), p. 122. The use of the word ‘gallant’ in this context contains the sense of a ‘ladies man’ thus punning on the gender ambiguity of the hermaphrodite.Google Scholar
  42. 56.
    See for example, Anon, The Supplement to the Onania (1724); Giles Jacob, Treatise of Hermaphrodites (1718); and Nicholas Venette, Le Tableau de L’Amour Conjugal (1696), translated as, The Mysteries of Conjugal love Reaveal’d (1707).Google Scholar
  43. 60.
    Jacob’s suggestion recalls Francis Beaumont’s address to his reader in Salmacis and Hermaphroditus (1602): ‘I hope my Poeme is so lively writ, / That thou wilt turne halfe-mayd with reading it’. Francis Beaumont, Salmacis and Hermaphroditus, in Nigel Alexander (ed.), Elizabethan Erotic Narrative Verse (London: Edward Arnold, 1967), p. 168.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Gilbert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations