Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contemporary Economic Theory: Some Critical Issues

  • Chapter
Contemporary Economic Theory

Abstract

Neoliberal theory has become very influential today. Several factors have contributed to its wide spread, among them the persistent decline in economic development since the mid-1970s and the rising dissatisfaction with Keynesian explanations and prescriptions. The analytical tensions and inadequacies of Keynesianism became particularly apparent in dealing with the concurrent problems of unemployment and inflation. Moreover, the continuing internationalization of economic relations in terms of trade, investment and finance gave rise to the concept of ‘globalization’ — that is, to the idea that national economies and cultures are dissolving into global processes. Global economic activity appears to be dominated by market forces; multinational companies can render national fiscal and monetary policies ineffective. Neoliberalism, with its strong support for market forces, is thus well suited to this international environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldwin, R. (1989) ‘The Growth Effects of 1992’, Economic Policy (October), 248–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1977) ‘Unanticipated Money Growth and Unemployment in the United States’, American Economic Review, 67, 101–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1978) ‘Unanticipated Money, Output, and Price Level in the United States’, Journal of Political Economy, 86, 549–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1993) Macroeconomics (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, C. (1992) ‘Economic and Monetary Union in Europe’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (Fall), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (1987) ‘Keynes, Lucas, and Scientific Progress’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 77 (May), 130–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (1988) ‘The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics’, The Economic Record, 64 (December), 278–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, K. (1978) The Crisis of the European Communities (Athens: Erato) (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, K. (1992) Europe after 1992 (Athens: Kritiki Editions) (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carchedi, G. (1991) Frontiers of Political Economy (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchini Report (1988) The European Challenge 1992 (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1985) Completing the Internal Market, White Paper from the Commission to the European Council (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union (ed.) (1989) Report of Economic and Monetary Union in the European Community (Delors Report) (Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, T., C. Haslam, J. Williams and K. Williams (1989) 1992 — The Struggle for Europe (New York: Berg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobb, M. (1959) ‘The Falling Rate of Profit’, Science & Society, 23 (Spring), 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. (1993) ‘European Monetary Unification’, Journal of Economic Literature, 31 (September), 1321–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. and L. Harris (1979) Rereading ‘Capital’ (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S., ‘Recent Developments in Macroeconomics’, The Economic Journal, 98 (June), 294–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, J.P. (1997) The Forbidden Discussion: Money, Europe, Poverty (Athens: Polis Editions) (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam, H. (1992) ‘Product Markets and 1992: Full Integration, Large Gains?’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (Fall), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1968a) ‘The Role of Monetary Policy’, American Economic Review, 58 (March), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1968b) ‘Inflation: Causes and Consequenses’ in M. Friedman (ed.), Dollars and Deficits (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. and C. Mayer (1990) ‘Takeovers’, Economic Policy (April), 189–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glyn, A. and B. Sutcliffe (1972) British Capitalism, Workers and the Profit Squeeze (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. (1990) ‘What Is New-Keynesian Economics?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 27 (September), 1115–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahl, J. and P. Teague (1990) 1992 — The Big Market: The Future of the European Community (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, B. and J. Stiglitz (1993) ‘New and Old Keynesians’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (Winter), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982) The Limits to Capital (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. and W. Milberg (1995) The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (1993) ‘The Assessment: The European Internal Market: The Next Steps’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 9 (Spring), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. and R. Quandt (1971) Microeconomic Theory: A Mathematical Approach (London: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh, M. (1980) Value and Crisis (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A. (1990) ‘Gains and Losses from 1992 Discussion’, Economic Policy (April), 46–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1990) Rethinking International Trade (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kydland, F. and E. Prescott (1987) ‘Rules Rather Than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans’, Journal of Political Economy, 87 (June), 473–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laibman, D. (1992) ‘Market and Plan: The Evolution of Social Structures in History and Theory’, Science & Society, 56 (Spring), 60–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1986) ‘Behind the Crisis: The Exhaustion of a Regime of Accumulation. A ‘Regulation School’ Perspective on Some French Empirical Work’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 18, 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. (1972a) ‘Expectations and the Neutrality of Money’, Journal of Economic Theory, 4, 103–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. (1972b) ‘Economic Testing of the Natural Rate Hypothesis’, in O. Eckstein (ed.), The Econometrics of Price Determination (Washington, DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. Capital (1977) (New York: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G. (1990) ‘A Quick Refresher Course in Macroeconomics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 27 (December), 1645–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, B. (1989) ‘New Classical Macroeconomics: A Sympathetic Account’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 91, 223–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundell, R. (1961) ‘A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas’, American Economic Review, 51 (September), 657–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neven, D. (1990) ‘Gains and Losses from 1992’, Economic Policy (April), 13–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, S. and R. Wolff (1987) Knowledge and Class: A Marxian Critique of Political Economy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, M., (ed.) (1988) Neoclassical Microeconomics, vols I and II (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowthorn, B. (1974) ‘Neo-Classicism, Neo-Ricardianism and Marxism’, New Left Review, 86 (July–August), 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semmler, W. (1982) ‘Theories of Competition and Monopoly’, Capital and Class, 12 (Winter), 91–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, A. (1977) ‘An Introduction to the History of Crisis Theories’ in Union of Radical Political Economics (URPE) US Capitalism in Crisis (New York: URPE), 219–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, A. (1992) ‘The Falling Rate of Profit as the Cause of Long Waves: Theory and Empirical Results’, in A. Kleinknecht, E. Mandel and I. Wallerstein (eds), New Findings in Long-Wave Research (New York: St Martin’s Press), 174–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, A. and J. Sutton (1984) ‘Involuntary Unemployment as a Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model’, Econometrica, 52 (November), 1351–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. and J. Stiglitz (1984) ‘Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device’, American Economic Review, 74 (June), 433–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1985) ‘Insiders and Outsiders in Wage Determination’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87, 411–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, G. (1994) ‘Real Business Cycles’, Journal of Economic Literature (December), 1750–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P. (1970) The Theory of Capitalist Development (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1984) Microeconomic Analysis (London: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1990) Intermediate Microeconomics (London: W.W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachou, A. (1993) ‘The Socialist Transformation of China: Debates over Class and Social Development’, Rethinking Marxism, 6 (Winter), 8–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachou, A. and T. Maniatis (1997) ‘Paving the Road for Privatizations: The Case of the Public Power Corporation of Greece’, paper presented at the Conference on ‘Democracy and the Welfare State’, Cultural Centre of Delphi, Greece (2–5 October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, R. and S. Resnick (1987) Economics: Marxian versus Neoclassical (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Andriana Vlachou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georgios K. Christou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece

    Andriana Vlachou (Associate Professor) (Associate Professor)

Copyright information

© 1999 Andriana Vlachou and Georgios K. Christou

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vlachou, A., Christou, G.K. (1999). Contemporary Economic Theory: Some Critical Issues. In: Vlachou, A. (eds) Contemporary Economic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27714-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation