Advertisement

Central—Local Relations: Themes and Issues

  • Mark Turner
Chapter
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

A source of perennial tension in states is the degree to which decision-making power and authority should be concentrated in central institutions and individuals. While there are examples of national leaders who have seemingly attempted to accrue all significant decision-making powers for themselves, the attainment of such a goal is simply infeasible, especially in today’s complex and turbulent world. Some power has to be given out to or recognized as existing in subnational authorities or other state organizations. Furthermore, the centripetal forces that gather power to the centre are countered by centrifugal forces that attempt to draw decision-making responsibilities to local authorities.

Keywords

Local Government Central Government Local Elite World Development Report Decentralisation Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bienen, H., Kapur, D., Parks, J. and Riedlinger, J. (1990) ‘Decentralization in Nepal’, World Development, 18 (1): 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blondel, J. (1990) Comparative Government: An Introduction ( New York and London: Philip Allan )Google Scholar
  3. Chambers, R. (1993) Challenging the Professions: Frontiers for Rural Development(London: Intermediate Technology Publications).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chitere, R. and Monya, J. (1989) ‘Decentralisation of Rural Development: The Case of the Kenya District Focus Approach’, African Administrative Studies, 32: 31–51.Google Scholar
  5. Coulson, A. (ed.) (1995) Local Government in Eastern Europe ( Aldershot: Edward Elgar ).Google Scholar
  6. Devas, N. (1997) ‘Indonesia: What Do We Mean by Decentralization?’, Public Administration and Development, 17 (3): 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diamond, L., Linz, J.J. and Lipset, S.M. (1995) ‘Introduction: What Makes for Democracy?’, in L. Diamond, J.J. Linz and S.M. Lipset (eds), Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy ( Boulder: Lynne Rienner ), pp. 1–66.Google Scholar
  8. Dunleavy, P. (1980) ‘Social and Political Theory and the Issues in Central—Local Relations’, in G.W. Jones (ed.), New Approaches to the Study of Central—Local Relations, ( Farnborough: Gower ), pp. 116–36.Google Scholar
  9. Hicks, U.K. (1950) Development From Below (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Huntington, S.P. (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century ( Norman: University of Oklahoma Press).Google Scholar
  11. Huque, A.S. (1986) ‘The Illusion of Decentralisation: Local Administration in Bangladesh’, International Review of Administrative Science, 52 (1): 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyden, G. (1983) No Shortcuts to Progress: African Development Management in Perspective ( London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  13. Jong-Soo, L. (1996) ‘Democracy and Decentralization: Theoretical Issues Reexamined’, in S. Kurosawa, T. Fujiwara and M. Reforma (eds), New Trends in Public Administration for the Asia-Pacific Region: Decentralization ( Tokyo: Local Autonomy College, Ministry of Home Affairs ), pp. 102–14.Google Scholar
  14. Klugman, J. (1994) ‘Decentralization: A Survey of Literature from a Human Development Perspective’, Human Development Report Office Occasional Papers, no. 13 ( New York: UNDP ).Google Scholar
  15. Kurosawa, S., Fujiwara, T. and Reforma, M. (1996) ‘Preface’, in S. Kurosawa, T. Fujiwara and M. Reforma (eds), New Trends in Public Administration for the Asia-Pacific Region: Decentralization ( Tokyo: Local Autonomy College, Ministry of Home Affairs), pp. vii-xiv.Google Scholar
  16. Leonard, D.K. (1982) ‘Analysing the Organisational Requirements for Serving the Rural Poor’, in D.K. Leonard and D.R. Marshall (eds), Institutions of Rural Development for the Poor ( Berkeley: University of California Press ), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  17. Maddick, H. (1963) Democracy, Decentralisation and Development ( London: Asia Publishing House).Google Scholar
  18. Mawhood, P. (1987) ‘Decentralisation and the Third World in the 1980s’, Planning and Administration, 14 (1): 10–22.Google Scholar
  19. Moore, W. (1963) Social Change ( Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  20. Morts, J. (1991) Extension Alternatives for Tropical Africa ( London: Overseas Development Institute).Google Scholar
  21. Nickson, R.A. (1996) Local Government in Latin America ( Boulder: Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  22. Oberst, R. (1986) ‘Administrative Conflict and Decentralisation: The Case of Sri Lanka’, Public Administration and Development, 6 (2): 163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olowu, D. and Smoke, R (1992) ‘Determinants of Success in African Local Governments: An Overview’, Public Administration and Development, 12 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneur-ial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector ( Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley).Google Scholar
  25. Pretty, J.N. (1995) ‘Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture’, World Development, 23 (8): 1247–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pycroft, C. (1996) ‘Local Government in the New South Africa’, Public Administration and Development, 16 (3): 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ranis, G. and Stewart, F. (1993) Government Decentralisation and Participation ( Geneva: UNDP).Google Scholar
  28. Regan, A. (1997) ‘Decentralisation Policy: Reshaping State and Society’ in H. Hansen and M. Twaddle (eds), Developing Uganda ( Oxford: James Currey ), pp. 159–75.Google Scholar
  29. Riker, W.H. (1975) ‘Federalism’, in F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science, vol. 5, Governmental Institutions and Processes ( Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley ).Google Scholar
  30. Rondinelli, D.A. (1981) ‘Government Decentralisation in Comparative Perspective’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47 (2): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rondinelli, D.A. and Minis, H.P. Jr (1990) ‘Administrative Restructuring for Economic Adjustment: Decentralisation Policy in Senegal’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 56 (3): 447–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rondinelli, D.A. and Nellis, J.R. (1986) ‘Assessing Decentralisation Policies in Developing Countries: A Case for Cautious Optimism’, Development Policy Review, 4 (1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rowat, M.D. (1996) ‘Public Sector Reform in the Latin American and Caribbean Region - Issues and Contrasts’, Public Administration and Development, 16 (4): 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slater, D. (1989) ‘Territorial Power and the Peripheral State: The Issue of Decentralisation’, Development and Change, 20 (3): 501–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, B.C. (1980) ‘Measuring Decentralisation’, in G.W. Jones (ed.), New Approaches to the Study of Central-Local Relations ( Farnborough: Gower ), pp. 137–51.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, B.C. (1985) Decentralisation: The Territorial Dimension of the State ( London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  37. Smith, B.C. (1993) Choices in the Design of Decentralisation ( London: Commonwealth Secretariat).Google Scholar
  38. Tendler, J. (1997) Good Government in the Tropics ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Ter-Minassian, T. (1997) ‘Decentralizing Government’, Finance and Development, 34 (3): 36–9.Google Scholar
  40. Turner, M. and Hulme, D. (1997) Governance, Administration and Development: Making the State Work ( London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. United Nations Technical Assistance Programme (1962) Decentralization for National and Local Development ( New York: United Nations).Google Scholar
  42. Vancil, R.F. and Buddrus, L.E. (1978) Decentralization: Managerial Ambiguity by Design ( Homewood, Ill.: Dow Jones-Irwin).Google Scholar
  43. Van der Gaag, J. (1995) Private and Public Initiatives: Working Together for Health and Education ( Washington, DC: World Bank).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vatikiotis, M.R.J. (1996) Political Change in Southeast Asia: Trimming the Banyan Tree ( Routledge: London).Google Scholar
  45. World Bank (1989) World Development Report 1989 ( New York: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar
  46. World Bank (1997) World Development Report 1997 ( New York: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Turner 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Turner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations