Abstract
In this chapter we utilize the concept of boundaries as both a substantive and methodological issue, to look at aspects of power and resistance in the research process. Our substantive topic is parenting and step-parenting after divorce or separation. Our methodology is qualitative and intensive, concerned with listening on their own terms (as far as possible) to individuals’ ‘accounts of’, or ‘stories about’, their understandings and experiences in the course of interactions with others.1 We are particularly interested in the processes involved in how biological and step-parents actively create, understand and make sense of ‘family’ and parenting both within and between households, and within the enabling or constraining wider context of their lives.2 Our fieldwork has involved interviews with resident parents, step-parents and nonresident parents, living in complex household arrangements that may also change significantly over time. To be a ‘family’ unit always implicitly involves issues about boundaries, for there needs to be some sense of what the unit refers to. In the particular complex and changeable circumstances of our interviewees’ lives, the issue of household and family boundaries becomes crucial, being highly significant for our research focus of parenting within and between households.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balbo, L. (1987) ‘Crazy Quilts: the Welfare State Debate from a Woman’s Point of View’, in A. S. Sassoon (ed.), Women and the State: The Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private (London: Hutchinson).
Barth, F. (ed.) (1969) Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (London: Allen & Unwin).
Batchelor, J., Dimmock, B. and Smith, D. (1994) Understanding Stepfamilies: What Can Be Learned from Callers to the STEPFAMILY Telephone Counselling Service (London: STEPFAMILY Publications).
Bawin-Legros, B. (1992) ‘From Marriage to Remarriage: Ruptures and Continuities in Parenting’, in U. Bjornberg (ed.), European Parents in the 1990s (New Brunswick: Transaction).
Bernardes, J. (1987) ‘“Doing Things with Words”: Sociology and “Family Policy” Debates’, Sociological Review, 35(4), pp. 679–702.
Birch, M. (1998) ‘Re/constructing Research Narratives: Self and Sociological Identity in Alternative Settings’, in J. Ribbens and R. Edwards (eds), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives (London: Sage).
Bott, E. (1957) Family and Social Networks (London: Tavistock).
Brannen, J. (1988) ‘The Study of Sensitive Subjects’, Sociological Review, 38(3), pp. 552–63.
Brannen, J. and Wilson, G. (1987) Give and Take in Families: Studies in Resource Distribution (London: Allen & Unwin).
Burgoyne, J. and Clark, D. (1984) Making a Go of It (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf).
Cassell, J. (1988) ‘The Relationship of Observer to Observed when Studying Up’, in R. G. Burgess (ed.), Studies in Qualitative Methodology, vol. 1: Conducting Qualitative Research (Greenwich, CF: JAI Press).
Clingempeel, W. and Segal, J. (1986) ‘Step-parent-Stepchild Relationships and the Psychological Adjustment of Children’, Child Development, 57(2), pp. 474–84.
Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies (London: Sage).
Cotterill, P. (1994) Friendly Relations? Mothers and their Daughters in Law (London: Taylor & Francis).
David, M., Edwards, R., Hughes, M. and Ribbens, J. (1993) Mothers and Education: Inside Out? Exploring Family-Education Policy and Experience (London: Macmillan).
Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1993) ‘Love and Intimacy’, Sociology, 27(2), pp. 221–42.
Edwards, R. (1993) Mature Women Students: Separating or Connecting Family and Education (London: Sage).
Edwards, R. (1996) ‘White Woman Researcher — Black Women Subjects’, Feminism and Psychology, 6(2), pp. 169–75.
Edwards, R. (1998) ‘A Critical Examination of the Use of Interpreters in the Qualitative Research Process’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(1), pp. 197–208.
Edwards, R. and Ribbens, J. (1998) ‘Living on the Edges: Public Knowledge, Private Lives, Personal Experience’, in J. Ribbens and R. Edwards (eds), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives (London: Sage).
Elshtain, J. B. (1981) Public Man, Private Woman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (1993) Negotiating Family Responsibilities (London: Tavistock/Routledge).
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Graham, H. (1984) Women, Health and the Family (Brighton: Harvester).
Graham, H. (1993) Hardship and Health in Women’s Lives (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf).
Gubrium, J. and Holstein, J. (1990) What is Family? (Mountain View, CA: Mayfield).
hooks, b. (1982) Ain’t I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism (London: Pluto).
Haskey, J. (1994) ‘Stepfamilies and Stepchildren’, Population Trends, 76 (London: HMSO).
Hughes, C. (1991) Stepparents: Wicked or Wonderful? (Aldershot: Avebury).
Kiernan, K. (1992) ‘The Impact of Family Disruption in Childhood on Transactions made in Young Adult Life’, Population Studies, 46 (London: HMSO).
Kruck, E. E. (1991) ‘Discontinuity Between Pre-and Post-divorce Father-Child Relationships’, Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 16, pp. 195–227.
Masson, J., Norbury, D. and Chatterton, S. G. (1983) Mine, Yours or Ours (London: HMSO).
Morgan, D. H. J. (1985) The Family, Politics and Social Theory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
Morgan, D. H. J. (1996) Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies (Cambridge: Polity).
Moxnes, K. (1992) ‘Changes in Family Patterns — Changes in Parenting?’, in U. Bjornberg (ed.), European Parents in the 1990s (New Brunswick: Transaction).
Neal, S. (1995) ‘Researching Powerful People from a Feminist and Anti-Racist Perspective: a Note on Gender, Collusion and Marginality’, British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), pp. 517–31.
Neale, B. and Smart, C. (1995) ‘Negotiating Parenthood: a Framework for Research’, and ‘The Family and Social Change: Some Problems of Analysis and Intervention’, Research Working Paper 13, GAPU, University of Leeds.
Nemenyi, M. (1992) ‘The Social Representation of Stepfamilies’, in U. Bjornberg (ed.), European Parents in the 1990s (New Brunswick: Transaction).
New, C. and David, M. (1985) For the Children’s Sake: Making Childcare More Than Women’s Business (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
Pascall, G. (1986) Social Policy: A Feminist Analysis (London: Tavistock).
Punch, M. (1986) The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork (Beverley Hills, CA: Sage).
Reay, D. (1995) ‘A Silent Majority? Mothers in Parental Involvement’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 18(3), pp. 337–48.
Ribbens, J. (1993) ‘Standing by the School Gate — the Boundaries of Maternal Authority?’, in M. David, R. Edwards, M. Hughes and J. Ribbens (eds), Mothers and Education: Inside Out? Exploring Family-Education Policy and Experience (London: Macmillan).
Ribbens, J. (1994) Mothers and their Children: A Feminist Sociology of Childrearing (London: Sage).
Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. (1999) ‘Breaking Out from our Circles of Assumptions: Contingent Categories in Researching “Step-families”’, in S. Ali, K. Coate and W. wa Goro (eds), Belonging: Contemporary Feminist Writings on Global Change (London: UCL Press).
Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. with Gillies, V. (1996) ‘Research Report: Parenting and Step-parenting after Divorce/Separation: Issues and Negotiations’, Changing Britain, 5, pp. 4–6.
Robinson, M. (1991) Family Transformation through Divorce and Remarriage: A Systematic Approach (London: Routledge).
Schulman, G. (1981) ‘Divorce, Single Parenthood and Stepfamilies: Structural Implications of these Transactions’, International Journal of Family Therapy, 3(2), pp. 87–112.
Smith, D. E. (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology (Boston, MA: North Eastern University).
Song, M. (1998) ‘Hearing Competing Voices: Sibling Research’, in J. Ribbens and R. Edwards (eds), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives (London: Sage).
Song, M. and Edwards, R. (1997) ‘Comment: Raising Questions around Perspectives on Black Lone Motherhood’, Journal of Social Policy, 26(2), pp. 233–44.
Stacey, J. (1990) Brave New Families (New York: Basic Books).
Standing, K. (1998) ‘Writing the Voices of the Less Powerful: Research on Lone Mothers’, in J. Ribbens and R. Edwards (eds), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives (London: Sage).
Visher, E. B. and Visher, J. S. (1988) Old Loyalties, New Ties (New York: Brunner-Mazel).
Walby, S. (1990) Theorising Patriarchy (Cambridge: Polity).
Wallman, S. (1978) ‘The Boundaries of “Race”: Processes of Ethnicity in England’, Man, 13(2), pp. 200–17.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 British Sociological Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edwards, R., Ribbens, J., Gillies, V. (1999). Shifting Boundaries and Power in the Research Process: the Example of Researching ‘step-Families’. In: Seymour, J., Bagguley, P. (eds) Relating Intimacies. Explorations in Sociology. British Sociological Association Conference Volume Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27683-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27683-7_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-74764-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27683-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)