Skip to main content

Abstract

In terms of size, internal structure and functioning, composition, and above all political role, the European Parliament (EP) has changed more radically than any other EU institution in recent years. Although this chapter will concentrate on the evolution of the EP since the beginning of the 1990s, the EP’s emerging legislative role must be traced back to 1987, when implementation of the Single European Act (SEA) greatly increased the EP’s involvement in EU decision-making. Both the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Amsterdam Treaty continued that trend, which has affected not only inter-institutional relations but also internal EP political dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelès, M. (1992) La vie quotidienne au Parlement Européen. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastassopoulos Report (1998) Minutes of sitting of 15 July 1998, Part II, Doc. PE 271.049, Brussels: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., Sinnott, R., and Svensson, P. (1998) People and Parliament in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochoou, D. (1998) Democracy in the European Union. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1998) The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., and Shackleton, M. (1995) The European Parliament. 3rd edn. London: Cartermill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997) Political Parties in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. and Norris, P. (eds) (1997) ‘Political Representation in the European Parliament’, special issue of European Journal of Political Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 153–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. and Tame, C. (eds) (1996) Parliaments and Parties. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (1998) ‘Governance Without Opposition: The Case of the European Union’, Government and Opposition, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 419–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (1999) ‘Political Representation in the European Union: A Common Whole, Various Wholes, or Just a Hole?’, in K. Neunreither and A. Wiener (eds), Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, M. (1998) ‘The European Parliament’s New Committees of Inquiry: Tiger or Paper Tiger?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 36, no. 1 (March 1998), pp. 115–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (1997) ‘Legitimacy and Democracy of Union Governance’, in G. Edwards and A. Pijpers (eds), The Politics of European Treaty Reform. London: Pinter. pp. 249–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. and Diedrichs, U. (1997) A New Kind of Legitimacy for a New Kind of Parliament — The Evolution of the European Parliament. Eiop papers 1997, at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1997-006a.htm

  • Westlake, M. (1994) A Modern Guide to the European Parliament. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Karlheinz Neunreither

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neunreither, K. (1999). The European Parliament. In: Cram, L., Dinan, D., Nugent, N. (eds) Developments in the European Union. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27572-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics