Skip to main content

Treaty Change in the European Union: The Amsterdam Experience

  • Chapter
Developments in the European Union

Abstract

This chapter explores the origin, preparation, negotiation and conclusion of the Amsterdam Treaty in 1997, the most recent instance of treaty change in the European Union (EU). Treaty changes are major events in the EU, involving a complicated and protracted interplay among member states, institutions, issues, interests and individuals. The Amsterdam Treaty is the culmination of a series of major treaty reforms that began with the Single European Act (SEA) in 1986 and continued with the Treaty on European Union (TEU) in 1992. Together, these treaty changes have fundamentally recast the EU bargain, extended the EU’s scope and altered the EU’s decision-making dynamics. The Amsterdam Treaty foresees further treaty change, but not of the multifaceted kind that characterized the SEA, TEU and the Amsterdam Treaty itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agence Europe (1994), June 3. Brussels: Agence Internationale D’Information Pour La Presse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baun, M. (1996) An Imperfect Union: The Maastricht Treaty and the New Politics of European Integration. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (1992), ‘The 1992 Initiative: Causes and Consequences’, in Alberta Sbragia (ed.), Europolitics: Institutions and Policymaking in the ‘New’ European Community. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union Group in the German Lower House (1994) ‘Reflections on European Policy’, Bonn, 1 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1987) ‘The 1985 Intergovernmental Conference and the Single European Act,’ in Roy Pryce (ed.), The Dynamics of European Union. London: Croom Helm, pp. 238–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Presidency (1996) ‘The EU Today and Tomorrow: Adapting the EU for the Benefit of Its Peoples and Preparing it for the Future: A General Outline For a Draft Revision of the Treaties’, Dublin: Department of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, D., Kellermann, A. and Winter, J. (1996) Reforming the Treaty on European Union: The Legal Debate. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyt, J. (1987) L’Acte Unique Européen: Commentaire. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. and Pijpers, A. (1997) The Politics of European Treaty Reform: The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and Beyond. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (1996) White Paper on the 1996 IGC, vol. 1, Official Texts of the EU Institutions. Luxembourg: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Herald Tribune (1995), 21/22 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, P.-H. and Maresceau, M. (eds) (1998) The State of the European Union, vol. 4, Deepening and Widening. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. (1997) ‘The Lessons of Maastricht,’ in Edwards and Pijpers, The Politics of European Treaty Reform, pp. 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds) (1992) The Intergovernmental Conference on Political Union. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S., (eds) (1994) The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debates, and Future Implications. Maastricht: EIPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, J. (1994) ‘Europe: A Future That Works,’ William and Mary Lecture, Leiden University, 7 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzuchelli, C. (1997) France and Germany at Maastricht: Politics and Negotiations to Create the European Union. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonagh, B. (1998) Original Sin in a Brave New World: An Account of the Negotiations of the Treaty of Amsterdam. Dublin: Institute of European Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monar, J. (1997) ‘The European Union’s Foreign Affairs System After the Treaty of Amsterdam: A “Strengthened Capacity for External Action”?’, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 413–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1991) ‘Negotiating the SEA: National Interest and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization, vol. 45 (Winter), pp. 19–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit, M. (1997) The Amsterdam Treaty, Harvard Law School Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. and Zysman, J. (1989) ‘1992: Recasting the European Bargain’, World Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 95–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Desmond Dinan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dinan, D. (1999). Treaty Change in the European Union: The Amsterdam Experience. In: Cram, L., Dinan, D., Nugent, N. (eds) Developments in the European Union. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27572-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics