Abstract
Gladstone’s decision to dispatch Lord Rosebery to try to settle the 1893 mining dispute was a new departure. Neither employers nor unions were enthusiastic about state involvement in industrial relations. Arbitration Acts from previous decades had proved to be largely dead letters. In 1886, however, the Board of Trade began to collect statistics on aspects of labour1 and in 1893 a Labour Department of the Board was formed. Its main task was still the collection of statistics and it added information on unions, strikes and lock-outs to what it already had on wages and hours. In addition it immediately became interventionist and unofficially mediated in major disputes. The Royal Commission on Labour, by far the biggest inquiry into trade unions and industrial relations yet carried out, reporting in 1894, gave every encouragement to the Board to extend this role. It talked of the need for ‘partnership’, of ‘common interests, by employers and workmen’ and looked forward to workers’ organisations having ‘a consultative voice in the division of the proceeds of industry’. The Government’s role, according to the Commission, was to encourage strong voluntary organisations of both employers and workers.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 W. Hamish Fraser
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fraser, W.H. (1999). The Intervening State, 1893–1914. In: A History of British Trade Unionism 1700–1998. British Studies Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27558-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27558-8_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-59611-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27558-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)