Advertisement

Objects as Pegs for Memory

  • Elisabeth van Houts
Part of the Explorations in Medieval Culture and Society book series (MECUSO)

Abstract

In the previous chapters we have occasionally signalled how memories of persons and places are linked with objects and sites. Objects such as jewellery, sacred vessels or cloths were passed on from one generation to the next and carried with them stories of their donors. That material evidence helps to trigger memories has been shown conclusively in anthropological studies of primarily oral cultures in modern times. The use of photographs, especially, has been found to be enormously effective in helping to recall the (recent) past.1 In the Middle Ages the use of pictures and objects to recall past events, and stories in general, was well known and advocated by the clergy as a means of teaching the illiterate.2 Today we have to rely on written references to ways in which medieval people were reminded of the past by looking at sites and objects. Few of the actual sites and objects which are mentioned in the sources have survived. Of the surviving material evidence, only objects from ecclesiastical institutions remain because churches and monasteries had archives and treasuries built in which to keep their heirlooms for ever. Very few objects from a secular background have survived, however, because family possessions if not stored in institutions, got dispersed and lost. Buildings and sites were more durable and they, like objects, had stories of their founders or later events attached to them.

Keywords

Family Possession Twelfth Century Original Owner Golden Ring Memorial Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    E. Tonkin, Narrating our Pasts. The Social Construction of Oral History (Cambridge, 1992), 93–5, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Carruthers, The Book of Memory. A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture (Cambridge, 1990), 221–9.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guillaume de Poitiers, Histoire de Guillaume le Conquérant, ed. R. Foreville (Paris, 1952), 205.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Waltham Chronicle, ed. L. Watkiss and M. Chibnall (Oxford, 1994), 50–6, xliii–xlviGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodulfus Glaber, Opera, ed. J. France, N. Bulst and P. Reynolds (Oxford, 1989), 162.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guillaume de Pouille, la Geste de Robert Guiscard, ed. M. Mathieu (Palermo, 1961), 254–9, 336–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reading Abbey Cartularies, ed. B. R. Kemp, 1 (London, 1986–87), 301–2, 353, 403–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. L. Nelson, ‘Women at the court of Charlemagne: A case of monstrous regiment?’, Medieval Queenship, ed. J. C. Parsons (1993), 43–62.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For a colour photograph of the illuminated page, Wolfenbüttel, Herzog August Bibliothek, MS Guelph 105 Noviss. 2, folio 171v., see C. R. Dodwell, Pictorial Arts of the West 800–1200 (Yale, 1993), 285.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    This section is based on J. Jesch, Women in the Viking Age (Woodbridge, 1991), 48–74;Google Scholar
  11. R. I. Page, Chronicles of the Vikings. Records, Memorials and Myths (London, 1995), 168–72;Google Scholar
  12. B. and P. Sawyer, Medieval Scandinavia. From Conversion to Reformation c. 800–1500 (Minneapolis and London, 1993), 188–213.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    Otto von Freising, Chronica sive de duabus civitatibus, ed. A. Hofmeister and W. Lammers (Darmstadt, 1961), 486.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    The Ecclesiastical History of Orderic Vitalis, ed. M. Chibnall, 2 (Oxford, 1969), 168.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Willelmi Malmesbiriensis, De gestis Regum Anglorum, ed. W. Stubbs, 1 (London, 1887), 218.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    The Chronicle of Battle Abbey, ed. E. Searle (Oxford, 1980), 15–6, 36–8, 60–2.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Actes des comtes de Flandre 1071–1128, ed. F. Vercauteren (Bruxelles, 1936), 16–19.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    B. S. Bachrach, Fulk Nerra, the neo-Roman consul 987–1040. A Political Biography of the Angevin Count (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1993), 131–5. For the consecration and subsequent collapse of the church, see Rodulfus Glaber, 58–64.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    D. Wilson, The Bayeux Tapestry (London, 1985), Pl. 17;Google Scholar
  20. D. Bernstein, The Mystery of the Bayeux Tapestry (London, 1986).Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    S. A. Brown and M. Herren, ‘The Adelae comitissae of Baudri of Bourgueil and the Bayeux Tapestry’, Anglo-Norman Studies, 16 (1993), 55–74.Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    D. Whitelock, Anglo-Saxon Wills (Cambridge, 1930), 15.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    Liber Eliensis, ed. E. O. Blake (London, 1962), 136.Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    C. R. Dodwell, Anglo-Saxon Art. A New Perspective (Ithaca and New York, 1982), 134–6, 188–9.Google Scholar
  25. 28.
    Eadmeri: Historia Novorum in Anglia, ed. M. Rule (London, 1884), 107–10; trans. G. Bosanquet, Eadmer’s History of Recent Events in England (London, 1964), 111–13.Google Scholar
  26. See also, V. Ortenberg, The English Church and the Continent 900–1100 (Oxford, 1992), 104.Google Scholar
  27. 30.
    C. Duhamel-Amado, ‘Femmes entre elles. Filles et épouses languedociennes (XIe et XIIe siècles)’, Femmes, mariages, lignages, XII e -XIV siècles. Mélanges offerts à Georges Duby (Bruxelles, 1992), 126–55, esp. 153–4.Google Scholar
  28. For a similar conclusion with regard to fifteenth-century bequests at Douai, see M. C. Howell, ‘Fixing movables: gifts by testament in late medieval Douai,’ Past and Present 150 (1996), 3–45 at 25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 31.
    P. Skinner, ‘Women, wills and wealth in southern Italy’, Early Medieval Europe, 2 (1993), 133–52; esp. 136–7, 138–9, 142–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 33.
    R. H. C. Davis, The Normans and their Myth (London, 1976), 74–5; Pl. 36.Google Scholar
  31. 34.
    D. Abulafia, Frederick II (London, 1992), 10–12; plate on 10 shows Emperor Charles V in the same coronation mantle.Google Scholar
  32. 36.
    The Life of King Edward Who Rests at Westminster, ed. F. Barlow, 2nd edn. (Oxford, 1992), 24.Google Scholar
  33. 37.
    English Romanesque Art 1066–1200, ed. G. Zarnecki (London, 1984), 291–2.Google Scholar
  34. 38.
    Suger, Vie de Louis VI le Gros , ed. H. Waquet (Paris, 1929), 276; trans. R. C. Cusamo and J. Moorhead, Suger, The Deeds of Louis the Fat (Washington 1992), 154.Google Scholar
  35. 39.
    Abbot Suger on the Abbey Church of St Denis and its Art Treasures, ed. E. Panofsky, 2nd edn (Princeton, 1979), 78–9.Google Scholar
  36. G. Beech, ‘The Eleanor vase: witness to Christian-Muslim collaboration in early 12th-century Spain’, Ars Orientalis, 22 (1992), 69–79. I am very grateful to Professor Beech for sending me his article.Google Scholar
  37. 40.
    Early Yorkshire Charters, ed. W. Farrer and C. T. Clay (York, 1939), 3, 60–70, at 69.Google Scholar
  38. 46.
    Beowulf, trans. D. Wright (Harmondsworth, 1970), 98, lines 3015–16. For an attempt to identify the surviving weapons, see O. Bouzy, ‘Les armes symboles d’un pouvoir politique: l’épée du sacre, la sainte lance, l’oriflamme au VIIIe-XIIe siècles’, Francia, 22–1 (1995), 45–57.Google Scholar
  39. 49.
    M. Clanchy, From Memory to Written Record, England 1066–1307, 2nd edn. (Oxford, 1993), 35–6.Google Scholar
  40. 51.
    A. Porée, Histoire de l’abbaye du Bec, 1 (Evreux, 1901), 650–1; Chibnall, Empress, 189–90.Google Scholar
  41. 53.
    P. Stafford, Queen Emma and Queen Edith. Queenship and Woman’s Power in Eleventh-Century England (Oxford, 1997), 143.Google Scholar
  42. 57.
    Les actes de Guillaume le conquérant et de la reine Mathilde pour les abbayes caennaises, ed. L. Musset (Caen, 1967), 112–13.Google Scholar
  43. 58.
    E. M. C. van Houts, ‘The Norman conquest through European eyes’, English Historical Review, 110 (1995), 832–53;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. P. McGurk and J. Rosenthal, ‘The Anglo-Saxon gospelbooks of Judith, countess of Flanders: their text, makeup and function’, Anglo-Saxon England, 24 (1995), 251–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© E. M. C. van Houts 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth van Houts
    • 1
  1. 1.Emmanuel CollegeUniversity of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations