Abstract
The WSPU, although it stole most of the headlines, was of course not the only suffrage society in Britain at the turn of the century. The NUWSS had not evaporated, but grown stronger, as it would continue to do, and although the NUWSS never sanctioned militancy, the suffragists and suffragettes worked together relatively harmoniously during the first few years of the WSPU’s existence. The suffragists and suffragettes then divided over the political efficacy and appropriateness of militant action, as well as over other ideological differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Rosamund Billington, ‘Ideology and Feminism: Why the Suffragettes were Wild Women’, Women’s Studies international Forum, Vol. 5, No. 6 (1982), p. 666.
Copyright information
© 1999 Sophia A. van Wingerden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Wingerden, S.A. (1999). ‘Suffrage Ladies’ and the ‘Shrieking Sisterhood’. In: The Women’s Suffrage Movement in Britain, 1866–1928. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27493-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27493-2_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27495-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27493-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)