Abstract
Germany’s partition after 1945 and its subsequent unification in 1990 captivate social scientists for a number of reasons, but one dominant factor is undoubtedly that these events reflect Germany’s tenuous commitment to a democratic system. In particular the collapse of the Weimar Republic in 1933 and the establishment of the Nazi regime epitomise the lack of a strong democratic tradition in Germany. When the Second World War ended in Germany’s defeat, the three Western occupational forces embarked upon the enormous task of ‘democratising’ West Germany. Given Germany’s totalitarian heritage and the reluctance of many Germans to endorse a liberal-democratic system, large parts of the German citizenry — the mass public as well as elites — had to be politically reeducated in order to make the second democracy more viable than the first one had been (Merkl, 1963). This was a monumental task. We know from social scientific surveys conducted after the Second World War that it was approximately two decades before a substantial majority of West Germans unequivocally supported liberal-democratic values. Because the Allies supported the reconstruction of the political system and because the economic miracle cushioned the political system from critical attitudes toward it, the Bonn democracy was stabilised and eventually succeeded in remaking Germany’s political culture (Baker et al. 1981). Especially during the 1970s and 1980s, the growth of political activities — social movements, citizens’ initiatives and the like — suggested the presence of a viable democratic political culture. By most accounts, West Germany had evolved into a stable liberal democracy by the time the Berlin Wall fell in 1989.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba (1963) The Civic Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Baker, Kendall, Russell J. Dalton and Kai Hildebrandt (1981) Germany Transformed (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Bauer-Kaase, Petra and Max Kaase (1996) ‘Five Years of Unification: The Germans on the Path to Inner Unity’, German Politics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–25.
Boynton, G. R. and Gerhard Loewenberg (1973) ‘The Development of Public Support for Parliament in Germany’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 3, pp. 169–89.
Dahl, Robert A. (1989) Democracy and its Critics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Dalton, Russell J. (1994) ‘Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanies’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 24, pp. 469–93.
Edinger, Lewis (1960) Post-Totalitarian Leadership: Elites in the German Federal Republic’, American Political Science Review, vol. 54, pp. 58–82.
Fuchs, Dieter, Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Carolin Schoebel (1991) ‘Perspektiven der politischen Kultur im vereinigten Deutschland’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 32/91, pp. 35–46.
Fuchs, Dieter and Edeltraud Roller (1993) ‘Cultural Requisites of the Transition Processes to Liberal Democracies in Central and Eastern Europe’, paper prepared for the meeting of the project ‘Political Culture, Political and Economic Orientations in Eastern Europe During the Transition to Democracy’, Budapest, 20–21 August 1993.
Kaase, Max (1971) ‘Demokratische Einstellungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in Rudolf Wildenmann (ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch fair Politik, vol. 2, (Munich: Guenter Olzog Verlag).
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Dieter Fuchs (eds) (1995) Citizens and the State (New York: Oxford University Press).
Kommers, Donald P. (1995) ‘The Basic Law and Reunification’, in Peter H. Merkl (ed.), The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty-Five (New York: New York University Press).
Merkl, Peter (1963) The Origins of the West German Republic (New York: Oxford University Press).
Merritt, Richard (1995) Democracy Imposed (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Rohrschneider, Robert (1994) ‘Report from the Laboratory: The Influence of Institutions on Political Elites’ Democratic Values in Germany’, American Political Science Review vol. 88, no. 4 (December), pp. 927–41.
Rohrschneider, Robert (1996a) ‘Cultural Transmission versus Perceptions of the Economy: The Sources of Political Elites’ Economic Values in the United Germany’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (February), pp. 78–104.
Rohrschneider, Robert (1996b) ‘Institutional Learning versus Value Diffusion: The Evolution of Democratic Values Among Parliamentarians in Eastern and Western Germany’, Journal of Politics, vol. 58, no. 2 (May), pp. 442–66.
Rohrschneider, Robert (1996c) ‘Pluralism, Conflict, and Legislative Elites in the United Germany’, Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 43–67.
Rohrschneider, Robert (1999) Learning Democracy: Democratic and Economic Values in Unified Germany (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Sniderman, Paul M. (1975) Personality and Democratic Politics (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Sullivan, John, James Piereon and George E. Markus (1982) Political Tolerance and American Democracy (Chicago, Ill.: Chicago University Press).
Verba, Sidney (1965) ‘Conclusion: Comparative Political Culture’, in Lucian W. Pye and Sidney Verba (eds), Political Culture and Political Developments (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rohrschneider, R. (1999). Visions of Democracy. In: Merkl, P.H. (eds) The Federal Republic of Germany at Fifty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27488-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27488-8_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77042-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27488-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)