Skip to main content

Fifty Years of German Federalism: An Overview and Some Current Developments

  • Chapter
The Federal Republic of Germany at Fifty
  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

German federalism has been a subject of controversy since the establishment of the Federal Republic in 1949, as it was in the Bismarck Reich and the Weimar Republic. According to certain key provisions of the Basic Law (constitution), the German Länder seem to have been granted more powers than they actually have, and developments over the years have eroded many of the powers they did receive. By the early 1960s the Federal Republic was being described as a ‘unitary’ (unitarisch) federal state, that is a federal system with strong centralising features. By the early 1970s it was also characterised as a system of cooperative federalism, and by the late 1970s as a system of Politikverflechtung, a complex form of joint decision making different in some important respects from the related American concept and practice of intergovernmental relations. In spite of the constitutional protection of federalism offered by Article 79, paragraph 3, of the Basic Law, many observers came to believe that federalism had become a facade for an increasingly centralised state, especially win regard to public finances; that the Länder were essentially administrative units; that the Land governments were not much more than training grounds and recruiting agencies for federal offices; and that the parliaments in the Länder had lost much of their relevance as legislative bodies, if not their reason for existence, except perhaps as preparatory schools for the elected national Bundestag. These harsher views can still be found and supported, but there is also a case to be made that, in spite of certain losses of power by the Länder, they not only remain important political and administrative units in a highly decentralised system of government but have also benefited from certain developments in recent years. Some examples of politically controversial actions taken by some Länder over the decades also suggest that dismissing them as mere administrative units is very misleading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Sources for this section include Arthur B. Gunlicks, Local Government in the German Federal System (Durham: Duke University Press, 1986), pp. 103–4 and ‘Constitutional Law and the Protection of Subnational Government in the United States and West Germany’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 18, no. 1 (Winter 1988), pp. 141–58; for the German version of this article see ‘Die Eigenständigkeit der Länder und die kommunale Selbstverwaltungsgarantie in den Vereinigten Staaten’, Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften, vol. 27, no. 1, Halbjahresband (1988), pp. 108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartmut Klatt, ‘Forty years of German Federalism: Past Trends and New Developments’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism vol. 19, no. 4 (Fall 1989), pp. 185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Konrad Hesse, Der unitarische Bundesstaat (Karlsruhe: C. E Müller, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fritz W. Scharpf, Bernd Reissert and Fritz Schnabel, Politikverflechtung: Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerhard Lehmbruch, ‘Institutional Linkages and Policy Networks in the Federal System of West Germany’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism vol. 19, no. 4 (Fall 1989), p. 222–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the text of the Unification Treaty, see Europa Archiv, vol. 45 (25 October 1990), pp. D515–36. For an English translation of the ‘cornerstones’, see Charlie Jeffery and John Yates, ‘Unification and Maastricht: The Response of the Länder Governments’, in Charlie Jeffery and Roland Sturm (eds), Federalism, Unification and European Integration (London: Frank Cass, 1993), pp. 72–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a discussion of the background and results of the work of the Joint Constitutional Commission regarding legislative powers, see Karl Peter Sommermann, ‘Die Stärkung der Gesetzgebungsdompetenzen der Länder durch die Grundgesetzreform von 1994’, Jura Heft 8 (1995), pp. 393–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For sources relating to the Bundesrat and the EC/EU, see, for example, Heiderose Kilper and Roland Lhotta, Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine Einführung (Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1996), pp. 217–29.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 28 September 1996, p. 10; 21 March 1997; 19 April 1997, p. 1; 11 August 1997, p. 1. For a legal argument that expresses scepticism about the view that LER violates the Basic Law, see Ludwig Renck, ‘Religionsunterricht in Brandenburg’, Landes-und Kommunalverwaltung 7, Heft 3 (1 March 1997), pp. 81–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 25 March 1997, p. 6. See also Werner Thieme, ‘Professoren as Beamte auf Zeit?’, Forschung & Lehre vol. 7 (1996), pp. 372–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For the crucifix decision, see Michael Reissenberger, ‘Wer bewacht die Wächter? Zur Diskussion um die Rolle des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B15–16/97 (4 April 1997), pp. 11–20;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rudolf Wassermann, ‘Zur gegenwärtigen Krise des Bundesverfassungsgerichts’, Recht und Politik 32, Heft 2 (June 1966), pp. 61–5;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ernst Benda, ‘Das Kruzifix-Urteil ist zu apodiktisch’, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 28, Heft 11 (1995), pp. 427–31;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manfred Kutscha, ‘Das Bundesverfassungsgericht und der Zeitgeist’, Neue Justiz, vol. 4 (1996), p. 171–5; Gerhard Czermak, ‘Der Kruzifix-Beschluss des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, seine Uraschen und seine Bedeutung’, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, vol. 51, pp. 3348–53;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Josef Isensee, ‘Religionsfreiheit vor dem Kreuz’, Politische Studien Sonderheft 2 (November 1995), pp. 19–31, and Peter Lerche, ‘Die Kreuz-Entscheidung: Kontinuität oder Bruch bisheriger Entscheidungslinien des Bundesverfassungsreichts?’ ibid., pp. 32–9;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Axel von Campenhausen, ‘Kruzifixe und religiöse Symbole in der öffentlichen Schule’, in Festschrift für Hans Maier Munich: Oldenbourg, 1996, pp. 661–71; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (4 August 1997), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christopher S. Allen, ‘Corporatism and Regional Economic Policies in the Federal Republic of Germany: The “Meso” Politics of Industrial Adjustment’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 19, no. 4 (Fall 1989 ), pp. 147–64.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See also Jeffrey J. Anderson, The Territorial Imperative: Pluralism, Corporatism, and Economic Crisis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Dagmar Oberlies, ‘Die bayerischen Abtreibungsgesetze’, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik (April 1997), pp. 149–51; Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 30 July 1996, p. 12; 2 August 1996, p. 2; 5 September 1996, p. 14; and 4 October 1996, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gunlicks, A.B. (1999). Fifty Years of German Federalism: An Overview and Some Current Developments. In: Merkl, P.H. (eds) The Federal Republic of Germany at Fifty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27488-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27488-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-77042-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27488-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics