Skip to main content

Mass Media Panic: The 1980s and 1990s

  • Chapter
  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

During a ‘moral panic’, the suspect category is either created or, more often, argue Goode and Ben-Yehuda, relocated, dusted off and attacked with a renewed vigour. New charges may be made, old ones dredged up and reformulated. In many cases a deviant category or stereotype already exists, but is latent and only activated at times of crisis or panic because secondary targets are needed to deflect attention away from some of society’s most pressing or insoluble problems. Since the reasons for scapegoating them vary according to historical circumstances, deviant categories are often refurbished over time. Violent crime or action movies reproduced on video are a case in point.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda,Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance (Oxford, 1994) pp. 74–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert Potts, ‘Why Censors can’t Save Us’, Guardian [Friday Review], 22 Mar. 1996, pp. 2–3; ‘Is Oliver Stone Responsible for the Consequences of this film?’, Guardian, 19 June 1996, p. 12; ‘Dustin Hoffman blames Hollywood over Dunblane’, The Independent, 11 May 1996, p. 1; ‘Dunblane Parents see Gun Battle Lost’, Daily Mail, 19 Nov. 1996, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander Walker, ‘Suffer the Little Children’, in Karl French (ed.), Screen Violence (London, 1996) p. 95;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Annette Hill, Shocking Entertainment: Viewer Response to Violent Movies (London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. John Martin, The Seduction of the Gullible: The Curious History of the British ‘Video Nasty’ Phenomenon (Nottingham, 1993), supplies plot summaries of ‘nasties’ and little else.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brian Brown, ‘Exactly What We Wanted’, in Martin Barker (ed.), The Video Nasties: Freedom and Censorship in theMedia (London, 1984) pp. 68–87;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geoffrey Barlow and Alison Hill (eds), Video Violence and Children (London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patrick Rogers, ‘Gunning for Gangstas’, People, 26 June 1995, pp. 105–6;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernard Weinraub, ‘Violent Movies and Records Undercut Nation, Dole Says’, The New York Times, l June 1995, pp. Al, 10;

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Bennun, ‘The Dogg Done Good’, Guardian, 6 Dec. 1996, pp. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dave Marsh, ‘Cops ’n’ Gangstas’, The Nation, 26 June 1995, pp. 908–9;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul Delaney, ‘Gangsta Rappers vs. The Mainstream Black Community’, USA Today, Jan. 1995, pp. 68–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michael E. Dyson, ‘Dole’s Bad Rap’, The Nation, 26 June 1995, pp. 909–10;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ian Katz, ‘Death Wish’, Guardian [Friday Review], 20 Sept. 1996, pp. 2–3, 19; ‘Gangsta Rap’, The New York Times, 19 Feb. 1996, p. 6. On 9 March 1997, 23-year-old rapper Notorious B.I.G. (Christopher Wallace), Shakur’s arch-rival who recorded on the East Coast Bad Boy label, was shot down and killed on leaving a Los Angeles party.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michael Eric Dyson, Between God and Gangsta Rap: Bearing Witness to Black Culture(New York,1996)pp. 176–86;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Armand White,Rebel for the Hell of It:The Life of Tupac Shakur (London, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. McGregor, ‘Television Violence: Corresponding Claims’, The Listener, 26 June 1986, pp. 26–7;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stephen Armstrong, ‘ ’ Ello,’ello: Where did all those Bodies go?’ The Sunday Times, Culture Section, 19 Jan. 1997, pp. 4–5;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barrie Gunter and Adrian Furnham, ‘Perceptions of Television Violence: Effects of Programme Genre and Type of Violence on Viewers’ Judgements of Violent Portrayals’, British Journal of Social Psychology, XXIII (1984) pp. 155–64;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guy Cumberbatch with Dennis Howitt, A Measure of Uncertainty: The Effects of the Mass Media (London, 1989) pp. 48–50;

    Google Scholar 

  21. ed. George Birbeck Hill, Boswell’s Life of Johnson, vol. 2 (Oxford, 1934) p. 367.

    Google Scholar 

  22. David Buckingham, Moving Images: Understanding Children’s Emotional Responses to Television (Manchester, 1996) pp. 303–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid.;

    Google Scholar 

  24. David Kidd-Hewitt and Richard Osborne (eds), Crime and the Media: The Post-modern Spectacle(London, 1995) pp. 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paul Myers, ‘Computer Games Come of Age with Monitor Man’, Guardian, 10 Feb. 1994, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neville Hodgkinson, ‘Videos Inspire Violent Urge for Nasty Side of Life’, The Sunday Times, 3 May 1987, p. 6;

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ray Surette, Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Images and Realities(Pacific Grove, CA, 1992) p. 140;

    Google Scholar 

  28. Geoff Andrew, ‘A History of Western Philosophy’, Time Out, 19–26 August 1992, p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For the causal link argument see: Frank Brady (ed.), Violence in the Media: Prospects for Change (London, 1996) ;

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frederic M. Thrasher, ‘The Comics and Delinquency: Cause or Scapegoat?’, Journal of Educational Sociology, XXV (1949) p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 John Springhall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Springhall, J. (1998). Mass Media Panic: The 1980s and 1990s. In: Youth, Popular Culture and Moral Panics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27458-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics