Skip to main content

Gangster Film Panic: Censoring Hollywood in the 1930s

  • Chapter
Youth, Popular Culture and Moral Panics
  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

From the end of the nineteenth century onwards, the technological innovation that, commercially exploited, completely transformed the non-working lives of ordinary urban youth was a device for the projection of moving images, an apparatus to resynthesize motion. British electrical engineer Robert W. Paul gave the first exhibition of his Theatrograph projector (an adaptation of ideas embodied in inventor Thomas Alva Edison’s coin-operated peepshow device, the Kinetoscope) to a scientific audience at Finsbury Technical College on 20 February 1896, but had considerable problems achieving any sort of adequate image on the screen. The first screening outside Paris of the Lumière brothers’ more famed Cinématographe was given on the same evening to the London press (admission charges were made the following day) hosted by entertainer and magician Félicien Trewey in the Great Hall of the Regent Street Polytechnic. It transferred on 9 March, as an attraction in the variety bill of the Empire Theatre, north of Leicester Square, where it ran to full houses. The race was now on to bring moving pictures to the general public. On 19 March, Paul’s Theatrograph opened at the Egyptian Hall, almost opposite the Royal Academy in Piccadilly, under the aegis of magician David Devant. Another screening of Paul’s invention, renamed as the Animatographe, ran at the Alhambra Music Hall in Leicester Square from 25 March 1896 and enjoyed a long residency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Luke McKernan, ‘The Arrival of British Movies’, in Colin Sorensen (ed.), London on Film: 100 Years of Filmmaking in London (London, 1996) pp. 17–25;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roy Armes,A Critical History of British Cinema (London, 1978) pp. 19–22;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roger Manvell and Rachael Low,History of the British Film, vol. I (London, 1949) p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emmanuelle Toulet, Cinema is 100 Years Old (London, 1995) pp. 19–22,90;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joel W. Finler, The Holly wood Story (London, 1988) pp. 14,18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffrey Richards, The Age of the Dream Palace: Cinema and Society in Britain, 1930–1939(London, 1984) pp. 13–14;

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. A. Hammerton, Books and Myself: Memoirs of An Editor (London, 1944) p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andrew Sarris, ‘Big Funerals: The Hollywood Gangster, 1927–1933’, Film Comment, XIII (1977) pp. 6–9. Recent epic gangster films include Brian de Palma’s Carlito’s Way (1994), Michael Mann’s Heat( 1995) and Martin Scorsese’s Casino (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eugene Rosow, Born to Lose: The Gangster Film in America (Oxford, 1978) pp. 215–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. John McCarty, Hollywood Gangland: The Movies’ Love Affair with the Mob (New York, 1993) pp. 83–111;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Audrey Field, Picture Palace (London 1974) pp. 109, 114;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeffrey Richards, ‘The Cinema and Cinema-Going in Birmingham in the 1930s’, in John K. Walton and James Walvin (eds),Leisure in Britain, 1780–1939 (Manchester, 1983) p. 87;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank Walsh, Sin and Censorship: The Catholic Church and the Motion Picture Industry (New Haven, CT, 1996) p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlos Clarens, Crime Movies: An Illustrated History (New York, 1980) pp. 83–100;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory D. Black, Hollywood Censored: Morality Codes, Catholics, and the Movies (Cambridge, 1994) pp. 124–32; McCarty,Hollywood Gangland, pp. 66–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Comp. John Mackie, The Edinburgh Cinema Enquiry (Edinburgh, 1933) pp. 3, 20–30; Richards,Age of the Dream Palace, p. 69; David Fowler, The First Teenagers: The Lifestyle of Young Wage-Earners in Interwar Britain (London, 1995) pp. 116–37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. James C. Robertson, The British Board of Film Censors: Film Censorship in Britain, 1896–1950(London, 1985) pp. 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid., pp. 80–2;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jeffrey Richards, ‘The British Board of Film Censors and Content Control in the 1930s: Images of Britain’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television,i (1981) pp. 105–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stephen Ridgwell, ‘The People’s Amusement: Cinema and Cinema-going in 1930s Britain’, The Historian, 52 (1996) pp. 18–21;’ “Crime School” Film Given a Bad Name by Probation Officer’, The Morning Advertiser, 23 Dec. 1938, p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Review of ‘Crime School’, Monthly Film Bulletin (MFB), 30 June 1938, p. 157; Clive Hirschhorn, The Warner Bros. Story (London, 1979) p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid; Tom Dewe Mathews, Censored (London, 1994) p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  23. James C. Robertson, The Hidden Camera: British Film Censorship in Action, 1913–1976 (London, 1989) pp. 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Films outlines from Monthly Film Bulletin (MFB) and other sources at BFI Library; Colin Shindler, Hollywood in Crisis: Cinema and Modern Society, 1929–1939 (London, 1996) p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nick Roddick,A New Deal in Entertainment: Warner Brothers in the 1930s (London, 1983) pp. 133–43; MFB;

    Google Scholar 

  26. John Russell Taylor (ed.), The Pleasure Dome: Collected Film Criticism of Graham Greene (Oxford, 1980) pp. 180–1, 195, 198–9. Barry Levinson’s Sleepers(1996) is a curious revival of the Hell’s Kitchen gang/reform-school/priest movie.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Herbert Blumer and Philip M. Hauser,Movies, Delinquency, and Crime (Chicago, 1933);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. W. W. Charters, Motion Pictures and Youth: A Summary (New York, 1933) pp. 38–9;

    Google Scholar 

  29. Garth S. Jowett, Ian C. Jarvie and Kathryn H. Fuller (eds), Children and the Movies: Media Influence and the Payne Fund Controversy (Cambridge, 1996) pp. 9–10; Black, Hollywood Censored, pp. 151–3.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Henryjames Forman, Our Movie Made Children (Chicago, IL, 1933) pp. 189–203; Black, Hollywood Censored, p. 152; Arthur R. Jarvis Jr, ‘The Payne Fund Reports: A Discussion of their Content, Public Reaction, and Affect on the Motion Picture Industry, 1930–1940’, Journal of Popular Culture, XIX (1991) pp. 127–40.

    Google Scholar 

  31. James M. Skinner, The Cross and the Cinema: The Legion of Decency and the National Catholic Office for Motion Pictures, 1933–1970 (Westport, CT, 1993) pp. 18–20; Rosow,Born to Lose, pp. 220–1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carlos Clarens, ‘Hooverville West: The Hollywood G-Man, 1934–1945’,Film Comment,XIII(1977)pp. 10–16; Rosow,Born to Lose, pp. 212–27; Roddick, A New Deal, pp. 107–12; Sarris, ‘Big Funerals’, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ‘Council to Ban “Horrific” Films’, The Kentish Express, 16 Dec. 1938, p. 6; Victor Bailey, Delinquency and Citizenship: Reclaiming the Young Offender, 1914–1948 (Oxford, 1987) App., Fig. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  34. ‘Do Gang Films Spoil a Boy?’, p. 9; Richard Ford, Children in the Cinema (London, 1939) p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Skinner, The Cross and the Cinema, p. 17; Clarens, Crime Movies, p. 14; Douglas Brode, Money, Women, and Guns: Crime Movies from Bonnie and Clyde to the Present (New York, 1995). Clarens offers the best contextual account of the crime genre to 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 John Springhall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Springhall, J. (1998). Gangster Film Panic: Censoring Hollywood in the 1930s. In: Youth, Popular Culture and Moral Panics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27458-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics