Advertisement

Power, Politics and Everyday Life: The Local Rationalities of Social Movement Milieux

  • Laurence Cox
Part of the Explorations in Sociology book series (EIS)

Abstract

Everyday language readily identifies social movement activity — campaigning, protesting, holding meetings, issuing statements — as ‘politics’; perhaps not in the sense of parties and parliaments, but politics none the less. Much academic literature shares this view of social movements as ‘politics by other means’, from resource mobilisation and political opportunity structure approaches to analyses of movements as expressions of economic interests. It is interesting, then, that precisely in continental Europe, where contemporary movements have arguably made the greatest impact on the party system and engaged in the sharpest confrontations with the state, theorists have increasingly stressed the cultural aspects of social movements.

Keywords

Everyday Life Social Movement Local Rationality Social Movement Activity Instrumental Rationality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck, U., Giddens, A. and Lash, S. (eds)(1994), Reflexive Modernization (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. and Luckmann, T. (1967), The Social Construction of Reality (London: Allen Lane).Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P., Berger, B. and Kellner, H. (1974), The Homeless Mind (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
  4. Bey, H. (1991), TTAZ (Brooklyn: Autonomedia).Google Scholar
  5. Cox, L. (1997), ‘Reflexivity, Social Transformation and Counter Culture’, in C. Barker and M. Tyldesley (eds), Third International Conference on Alternative Futures and Popular Protest, vol. 1 (Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University).Google Scholar
  6. Cox, L. (1998), ‘Towards a Sociology of Counter Cultures?’, in E. McKenna and R. O’Sullivan (eds), Cultural Diversity in Modern Ireland (Aldershot: Avebury) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  7. Diani, M. (1992a), ‘The Concept of Social Movement’, Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diani, M. (1992b), ‘Analyzing Social Movement Networks’, in M. Diani and R. Eyerman (eds), Studying Collective Action (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  9. Diani, M. and Eyerman, R. (eds) (1992), Studying Collective Action (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  10. Eder, K. (1985), ‘The “New Social Movements”’, Social Research, (52) 663–716.Google Scholar
  11. Eder, K. (1993), The New Politics of Class (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  12. Eyerman, R. and Jamison, A. (1991), Social Movements (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  13. Giddens, A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  14. Giddens, A. (1994), ‘Living in a Post-traditional Society,’ in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds), Reflexive Modernization (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  15. Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence & Wishart).Google Scholar
  16. Gramsci, A. (1991), Il materialismo storico e la filosofia di Benedetto Croce (Rome: Riuniti).Google Scholar
  17. Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1 (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  19. Hradil, S. (1987), Sozialstrukturanalyse in einer fortgeschrittenen Gesellschaft (Opladen: Leske & Budrich).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lash, S. (1994a), ‘Reflexivity and its doubles’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds), Reflexive Modernization (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  21. Lash, S. (1994b), ‘Expert-systems or Situated Interpretation?’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds), Reflexive Modernization (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  22. Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987), The End of Organized Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  23. McKay, G. (1996), Senseless Acts of Beauty (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  24. McLennan, G. (1981), Marxism and the Methodologies of History (London: New Left Books).Google Scholar
  25. Melucci, A. (1985), ‘The Symbolic Challenge of Contemporary Movements’, Social Research, 52, 789–816.Google Scholar
  26. Melucci, A. (1989), Nomads of the Present (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
  27. Melucci, A. (1992), L’invenzione del presente, 2nd edn (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
  28. Melucci, A. (1995), ‘The New Social Movements Revisited’, in L. Maheu (ed.), Social Movements and Social Classes (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  29. Müllier, D. (1990), ‘Zur Rekonstruktion von Habitus — “Stammbaumen” und Habitus — “Metamorphosen” der neuen sozialen Milieus’, Forschungsjournal neue soziale Bewegungen, 8(3), 57–65.Google Scholar
  30. Offe, C. (1984), Contradictions of the Welfare State (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  31. Offe, C. (1985), ‘New Social Movements’, Social Research, 52, 817–68.Google Scholar
  32. Raschke, J. (1985), Soziale Bewegungen (Frankfurt: Campus).Google Scholar
  33. Raschke, J. (1993), Die Griinen (Köln: Bund-Verlag).Google Scholar
  34. Sulkunen, P. (1992), The European New Middle Class (Aldershot: Avebury).Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, E. P. (1993), Customs in Common (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
  36. Touraine, A. (1981), The Voice and the Eye (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  37. Touraine, A. (1985), ‘An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements’, Social Research, 52, 749–88.Google Scholar
  38. Vester, M. V., von Oertzen, P., Geiling, H., Hermann, T., and Mueller, D., (1993), Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel (Cologne: Bund).Google Scholar
  39. Wagner, P. (1994), A Sociology of Modernity (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  40. Wainwright, H. (1994), Arguments for a New Left (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  41. Weber, M. (1984), Soziologische Grundbegriffe (Tubingen: Mohr).Google Scholar
  42. Weber, M. (1985), The Protestant Ethic and the Spint of Capitalism (New York: Scribner’s).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurence Cox

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations