Contingent and Non-Standard Work in the United States: Towards a More Poorly Compensated, Insecure Workforce

  • Sam Rosenberg
  • June Lapidus
Chapter
Part of the Critical Perspectives on Work and Organisations book series

Abstract

In the United States we hear much about ‘family friendly’ workplace initiatives. There are more dual-earner couples and female-headed households bringing to the fore work/family conflicts. Employers are said to be responding with more ‘family friendly’ working time arrangements. As jobs become more flexible and work schedules more diverse, it is alleged that the ‘factory clock’ is in the process of becoming more aligned with the cycles of workers’ personal lives. Moreover, it is argued that workers have not had to pay for these more desirable work arrangements through lower compensation or poorer benefit packages.

Keywords

Insurance Coverage Fishing Tempo Dispatch Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, K.G. (1988) ‘Flexible Staffing Arrangements and Employers’ Short-Term Adjustment Strategies’, in Hart, R.A. (ed.) Employment, Unemployment and Labor Utilization, London: Unw in Hyman.Google Scholar
  2. Abraham, K.G. (1990) ‘Restructuring the Employment Relationship: The Growth of Market-mediated Work Arrangements’, in Abraham, K.G. and McKersie, R.B. (eds.) New Developments in the Labor Market: Toward a New Institutional Paradigm, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Abraham, K.G. and Taylor, S.K. (1996) ‘Firms’ Use of Outside Contractors: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Labor Economics, 14: 3, 394–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appelbaum, E. (1987) ‘Restructuring Work: Temporary, Part-Time, and At-Home Employment’, in Hartmann, H.I. (ed.) Computer Chips and Paper Clips: Technology and Women’s Employment, II, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Belous, R.S. (1989) The Contingent Economy: The Growth of the Temporary, Part-Time and Subcontract Workforce, Washington, DC: National Planning Association.Google Scholar
  6. Carnoy, M., Castells, M. and Benner, C. (1997) ‘Labour Markets and Employment Practices in the Age of Flexibility: A Case Study of Silicon Valley’, International Labour Review, 136: 1, 27–48.Google Scholar
  7. Clinton, A. (1997) ‘Flexible Labor: Restructuring the American Work Force’, Monthly Labor Review, 120: 8, 3–17.Google Scholar
  8. Cohany, S.R. (1996) ‘Workers in Alternative Employment Arrangements’, Monthly Labor Review, 119: 10, 31–45.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, R. (1993) Rights at Work: Employment Relations in the Post-Union Era, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrenberg, R.G., Rosenberg, P. and Li, J. (1988) ‘Part-Time Employment in the United States’, in Hart, R.A. (ed.) Employment, Unemployment and Labor Utilization, London: Unw in Hyman.Google Scholar
  11. Golden, L. and Appelbaum, E. (1992) ‘What was Driving the 1982–88 Boom in Temporary Employment? Preferences of Workers or Decisions and Power of Employers’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 51: 4, 473–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon, D.M. (1996) Fat and Mean: The Corporate Squeeze of Working Americans and the Myth of Managerial ‘Downsizing’, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, B. (1994) Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Hippie, S. and Stewart, J. (1996) ‘Earnings and Benefits of Contingent and Non-contingent Workers’, Monthly Labor Review, 119: 10, 22–30.Google Scholar
  15. Houseman, S.N. (1997) ‘New Institute Survey on Flexible Staffing Arrangements’, Employment Research, Spring, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  16. Ichniowski, B.E. and Preston, A.E. (1986) ‘New Trends in Part-Time Employment’, in Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting, Industrial Relations Research Association.Google Scholar
  17. Kalleberg, A.L., Rasell, E., Hudson, K., Webster, D., Reskin, B.F., Cassirer, N. and Appelbaum, E. (1997) Nonstandard Work, Substandard Jobs: Flexible Work Arrangements in the US, Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Lapidus, J. (1990) The Temporary Help Supply Industry and the Operation of the Labor Market, unpublished PhD thesis, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Lapidus, J. (1993) ‘Family Structure, flexible Employment and Labor Market Segmentation: Evidence from a Study of the Temporary Help Industry’, International Contributions to Labour Studies, 3: 91–100.Google Scholar
  20. Mangum, G., Mayall, D. and Nelson, K. (1985) ‘The Temporary Help Industry: A Response to the Dual Internal Labor Market’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38: 4, 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchell, D.J.B. (1985) ‘Shifting Norms in Wage Determination’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Polivka, A.E. (1996a) ‘Contingent and Alternative Work Arrangements Defined’, Monthly Labor Review, 119: 10, 3–9.Google Scholar
  23. Polivka, A.E. (1996b) ‘A Profile of Contingent Workers’, Monthly Labor Review, 119: 10, 10–21.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, S. (1983) ‘Reagan Social Policy and Labour Force Restructuring’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7: 2, 179–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberg, S. (1989) ‘The Restructuring of the Labor Market, the Labor Force, and the Nature of Employment Relations in the United States in the 1980s,’ in Rosenberg, S. (ed.) The State and the Labor Market, New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, S. (1994) ‘The More Decentralized Mode of Labor Market Regulation in the United States’, Economies et Sociétés, 18: 8, 35–58.Google Scholar
  27. Segal, L.M. and Sullivan, D.G. (1995) ‘The Temporary Labor Force’, Economic Perspectives, 19: 2, 2–19.Google Scholar
  28. Solow, R. (1980) ‘On Theories of Unemployment’, American Economic Review, 70: 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
  29. Stinson, J.F. (1997) ‘New Data on Multiple Jobholding Available from the CPS’, Monthly Labor Review, 120: 3, 3–8.Google Scholar
  30. Tilly, C. (1996) Half a Job: Bad and Good Part-Time Jobs in a Changing Labor Market, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  31. US Department of Labor (1995) Report on the American Workforce, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  32. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1995) ‘Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements’, Report 900, August, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  33. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1997) ‘Contingent and Alternative Employment Arrangements, February 1997’, December 2, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sam Rosenberg and June Lapidus 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sam Rosenberg
  • June Lapidus

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations