Skip to main content
  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

The book examines the evolution of Russian society and its relationship with the party-state during the period 1985–91. During these years, when Mikhail Gorbachev was General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) Central Committee, both society and the party changed profoundly. The causes and nature of the transformation are still imperfectly understood and this book attempts to fill in part of the jigsaw. It provides a case study which is intended to aid understanding of the wider process of demokratizatsiya: democratization as it occurred in Russia during this period. Gorbachev’s democratizationprogramme included the introduction of multi-candidate elections both for the soviets and within the party, but also a much wider process of removing prohibitions on freeassociation and encouraging social initiatives. This book analyses the emergence of social initiatives, initiatives which could be described as ‘building civil society’. ‘Civil society’ is understood to mean the area of public activity, normally non-economic in character, involving the creation and functioning of independent, non-governmental organizations and movements, which by their being and actions contributed to the curbing of the party-state and the evolution of democratic values and procedures.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. ‘Arshinom obshchim ne izmerit”, F. Tyutchev, ‘Umom Rossiyu ne ponyat”, Stikhotvoreniya (Sverdlovsk, 1980) p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Bibliography. Of the academic works, Matthews, M., ‘Perestroika and the rebirth of charity’, in Jones, Connor and Powell feds), is an excellent account of developments up to 1988. Brody and Boris is more general, as is Reiner. A. White (1993) presents many of the arguments made in this book. Leitch (1997), while focusing on a small case study of Voronezh in the post-communist period, makes many perceptive judgements on the Soviet era. Fabel, F., ‘Self-help initiatives: forces of self-healing within Russian society?’ in Segbers and de Spiegeleire (eds) is brief and published in 1995, but provides a thoughtful discussion of issues relevant also to the earlier period, based on analysis of four Petersburg organizations. Nina Belyaeva (Interlegal Research Center) has written extensively and more theoretically on civil society and the voluntary sector. IRIS also raises important theoretical points, but focuses mostly on the post-1991 era. Publications by Russian and British charities present a mass of information on the more recent period. They include Young and Legendre (Charities Aid Foundation); the BEARR and Healthprom Newsletters; Third Sector (Moscow: Interlegal); and, in Russian, Vestnik blagotvoritel’nosti (Moscow: Moscow Charity House and Soprichastnost’ Fund) and Den’gi i blagotvoritel’nost’ (Moscow: CAF and Soprichastnost’). There are a number of directories produced in the post-1991 period. Chizhov (1992), in Russian, is the most detailed. Others are Harvey (ch. 14); Ruffin, McCarter and Upjohn; Vessey (Perm); Ousow (Samara); Petersburg; Yntemna (available in Russian and English). Of specific organizations, Memorial, which was of course much in addition to a charity/self-help organization, has attracted the most attention. Smith’s is the most thorough and analytical treatment; Adler’s is also helpful. A. White (1995) discusses Memorial, particularly its provincial aspects, more thoroughly than in this book. Devlin and Fish make useful points on Memorial within their wider discussions of independent political organizations. For other charities and self-help groups, see the Bibliography.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hauslohner (1989) p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Easton, P., ‘The rock music community’, in Riordan (ed.) (1989), especially pp. 47 and 79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leitch (1993) arrives at a similar conclusion p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On the figures, see e.g. Tolz (1989) p. 4 and (1990) ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leitch (1993) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Anne White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, A. (1999). Demokratizatsiya and the Voluntary Sector. In: Democratization in Russia under Gorbachev, 1985–91. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27372-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics