Abstract
Environmental protest1 is often hard work. Among other factors, within a group, the variety of ideas about what local protest and political pressure is aiming for, can made civic action frustrating. Protesters fighting local infrastructure plans often find that value arguments do not always make much of an impression on decision makers. They turn to what they think would be a more authoritative source of support for their case, namely a scientifically informed environmentalist discourse. This chapter looks at how such a discourse, in fact, serves to dampen debate about substantive political issues through downplaying the crucial role of imagined utopias.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (orig. Risikogesellschaft: auf dem Weg in einer Andere Moderne, Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 1986) (London: Sage, 1992).
Beck, U., ‘The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Reflexive Modernization’, in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash (eds), Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity, 1994).
Boehmer-Christiansen, S., ‘Precautionary Principle’, Environment, vol. 35: 3 (1993), pp. 42–4.
Buttel, F. H., Hawkins, A. P., and Power, A. G., ‘From Limits to Growth to Global Change: Constraints and Contradictions in the Evolution of Environmental Science and Ideology’, Global Environmental Change, vol. 1 (1990), pp. 57–66.
Dickens, P., Society and Nature: Towards a Green Social Theory (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992).
Giddens, A., Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age (Cambridge: Polity, 1991).
Grint, K., and Woolgar, S., ‘On Some Failures of Nerve in Constructivist and Feminist Analyses of Technology’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 20 (1995), pp. 286–310.
Latour, B., We Have Never Been Modern (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993).
Markovits, A., and Gorski, P. S., The German Left: Red, Green and Beyond (Cambridge: Polity, 1993).
Melucci, A., Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society (London: Hutchinson Radius, 1989).
Porter, T., ‘Statistics and the Politics of Objectivity’, Revue de Synthèse, Series 4:1, Jan.—Mar. 1993, pp. 87–104.
Scharf, T., The German Greens: Challenging the Consensus (London: Berg, 1994).
Vitebsky, P., ‘Is Death the Same Everywhere? Contexts of Knowing and Doubting’, in M. Hobart (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance (London: Routledge, 1993).
Woolgar, S., Science: The Very Idea (Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1988).
Yearley, S., ‘Standing in for Nature: the Practicalities of Environmental Organizations’ use of Science’, in K. Milton (ed.), Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology (London: Routledge, 1993).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Macmillan Press Ltd
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berglund, E. (1999). Utopias and Environmentalist Ambivalence Concerning Science. In: Fairweather, N.B., Elworthy, S., Stroh, M., Stephens, P.H.G. (eds) Environmental Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27265-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27265-5_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27267-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27265-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)