Employing Qualitative Methods in the Assessment of Environmental Policy

  • Matt Stroh


Drawing on emerging debates in geography around questions of identity and consumption my research, based in Sheffield, UK, employs a qualitative methodology. In this chapter I work through some initial findings from my PhD research to suggest ways in which this qualitative research should be used to assess environmental policy more effectively.


Environmental Policy Qualitative Method Policy Assessment Environmental Future Intergenerational Justice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blowers, A., The Limits of Power: The Politics of Local Planning Policy (Oxford: Pergamon, 1980).Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, J., ‘The Production and Consumption of Environmental Meanings in the Mass Media: a Research Agenda for the 1990s’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, vol. 15 (1990), pp. 139–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke, D, D., ‘Towards a Geography of the Consumer Society’, working paper 91/3 (Leeds: School of Geography, University of Leeds, 1991).Google Scholar
  4. Eden, S, S., ‘Individual Motives and Commercial Retailing in Green Consumerism’, unpublished PhD thesis (School of Geography, University of Leeds, 1992).Google Scholar
  5. Eden, S., ‘Individual Environmental Responsibility and its Role in Public Environmentalism’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 25 (1993), pp. 1743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson, P., ‘Towards a Cultural Politics of Consumption’, in J. Bird, B. Curtis, T. Putnam, G. Robertson and L. Tickner (eds), Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change (London: Routledge, 1993).Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, R., ‘The Story So Far and Other Transformations?’, in D. Punter (ed.), Introduction to Contemporary Cultural Studies (London: Longmans, 1986).Google Scholar
  8. Lather, P., ‘Feminist Research Perspectives on Empowering Research Methodologies’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 11 (1988), pp. 569–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lauretis, T. de, Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics and Cinema (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  10. Lauretis, T. de, ‘Eccentric Subjects: Feminist Theory and Historical Consciousness’, Feminist Studies, vol. 16 (1990), pp. 115–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Miller, D., Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).Google Scholar
  12. Opie, A., ‘Qualitative Research, Appropriation of the “Other” and Em-powerment’, Feminist Review, vol. 40, Spring (1992), pp. 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Passmore, J., Man’s Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions (London: Gerald Duckworth and Co., 1974).Google Scholar
  14. Sack, R., ‘The Consumer’s World: Place as Context’, Annals of the Asso-ciation of American Geographers, vol. 78 (1988), pp. 642–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Steward, F., ‘Green Times’, in S. Hall and M. Jacques (eds), New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s (London: Lawrence and Wishart, in association with Marxism Today, 1990).Google Scholar
  16. Stroh, M., ‘Consuming Environmental Policy’, in I. Fodor and G. Walker (eds), Environmental Policy and Practice in Eastern and Western Europe (Pécs: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Matt Stroh 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Stroh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations