Skip to main content

Education, Science and Industrialization, 1750s–1850s

  • Chapter
Book cover Education in Britain, 1750–1914

Part of the book series: Social History in Perspective ((SHP))

  • 35 Accesses

Abstract

Social scientists have suggested that for a national economy to achieve self-sustaining industrial growth, some 30–40 per cent of its population need to be literate, and that the British Industrial Revolution exemplifies this: literacy rates in both England and Scotland had crossed that threshold by 1750.1 Such a vaguely defined concept is, however, of dubious value when applied to British economic expansion in this period. It is not evident why, even if applicable to twentieth-century economies (which is uncertain), it should pertain to eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century conditions. Evidence for measuring economic growth rates in that period is often less than adequate and the chronology of industrialization contentious, and while signature evidence is useful for spatial and chronological comparison of levels of elementary education, it is rudimentary as an absolute measure (Chapter 2). Moreover, by the mid eighteenth century most nations in north-west Europe had literacy levels as good as or better than Britain’s without experiencing an industrial revolution.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cipolla (1969), Ch. 3; Deane (1973), 64; Pollard (1965), 180,211–12; Schofield, R. S. (1973), 452–4; Sanderson (1968), 131–54; Sanderson (1972b), 82–9; Sanderson (1983), 16; Stephens (1977), 3–4, 6, 58; Stephens (1987), passim. Cf. Eversley (1964),135; Grayson (1983), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stephens (1964), 213–14; Schofield, R. E. (1963), passim; Schofield, R. E. (1972), 139–40; Schofield, R. E. (1967),98; Schofield, R. E. (1956); Musson and Robinson (1960), 224, 227–8; Musson and Robinson (1969), 162.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kronick (1962), 73; Musson and Robinson (1969), passim; and see pp. 145–6,147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mathias (1969),74–5; Mathias (1991); Musson and Robinson (1960), 227–9; Musson and Robinson (1969),passim.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Inkster (1983); Gaski (1982). Cf. M. Berman, rev. Journal of Social History 5 (1972), 523; Morrell (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. M. Berman, rev. Journal of Social History 5 (1972), 525–6; Inkster (1976); Inkster (1983); Shapin (1972); Morris, R.J. (1980),200–4; Mathias (1991), 37: Stephens (1964), 214; Simon, B. (1960), 24–6, 62–71. But see Schofield, R. E. (1963), Ch. 13. See also pp. 148–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perkin (1968), 137n; Perkin (1969),72–3,82 and Ch. 6; Flinn (1967), 23–5. For a dubious psychoanalytical explanation, see Hagen (1962), especially Chs 9–13; Hagen (1967); Flinn (1966), 86–7; A. Gerschenkron, rev. Economica n.s. 32 (1965), 91–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 W. B. Stephens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stephens, W.B. (1998). Education, Science and Industrialization, 1750s–1850s. In: Education in Britain, 1750–1914. Social History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27231-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27231-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-60512-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27231-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics