Abstract
Seventeenth-century political theorists were addressing the inhabitants of a continent where the unity symbolized by the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire had vanished, where the myth of a universal Christendom had been replaced by separate and sovereign states whose claims to power were derived from inside the political community, not from an external and transnational authority. These emerging states increasingly wielded their territorial power with a monopoly over the use of physical coercion and with a moral authority separate from either divine sanction on the one hand, or mere brute force on the other. And by the end of the century, these same sovereign states would anchor their existence not in the person of an individual ruler or rulers, but in a set of institutional structures whose public power continued even as individual magistrates passed from the scene. By 1700 neither the people nor the prince defined states which had become impersonal and theoretical entities, higher communities whose existence transcended the imprint of individuals and even status groups.1 By 1700 sovereignty inhered not in the prince, as had been the case at the opening of the century, nor in the popular will, as evidenced in some countries towards the end of the century, but in a particular order of continuous public authority, a final and absolute judicial entity divorced from the flesh and allied to the realm of abstraction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
On the characteristics of the state see Antony Black, Political Thought in Europe, 1250–1450 (Cambridge, 1992), pp. 186–7.
F. H. Hinsley, Sovereignty (Cambridge, 1986), p. 142.
Michael Zuckert, Natural Rights and the New Republicanism (Princeton, NJ, 1994), p. 120.
C. Bangs, Arminius: A Study in the Dutch Reformation (Nashville, TN, 1973).
Richard Cox, ‘Grotius’, in History of Political Philosophy, ed. Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey (Chicago, 1987), p. 387.
Grotius, The Law of War and Peace, trans. Francis W. Kelsey (Indianapolis, IN, 1925), p. 38.
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuck (Cambridge, 1991), p. 109.
See James Tully’s introduction to Samuel Pufendorf, On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, trans. Michael Silverthorne (Cambridge, 1991), p. xx.
See Craig L. Carr’s introduction to The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf, trans. Michael J. Sadler (Oxford, 1994), pp. 4–5.
Of the Law of Nature and Nations, in Political Writings, pp. 151–2. See also J. W. Gough, The Social Contract (Oxford, 1957), pp. 119–20.
Brad S. Gregory, introduction to Tractatus theologico politicus, trans. Samuel Shirley (New York, 1989), pp. 27, 31.
For the most recent biographical sketch, see W. N. A. Klever, ‘Spinoza’s Life and Work’, in Don Garrett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (Cambridge, 1996), pp. 13–53. Also Gregory, introduction to Tractatus theologico politicus, p. 4.
Robert Rowen, John de Witt (Princeton, NJ, 1978); Israel, The Dutch Republic, pp. 726–38.
Roger Scruton, Spinoza (Oxford, 1986), pp. 10–11.
Alan Donogan, Spinoza (Chicago, 1988), p. 8.
Errol E. Harris, Spinoza’s Philosophy: An Outline (Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1992), p. 24.
Jeremy Bentham quoted in Maurice Cranston, ‘Human Rights, Real and Supposed’, in D. D. Raphael (ed.), Political Theory and the Rights of Man (Bloomington, IN, 1967), p. 44.
Brian Tierney, ‘Origins of Natural Rights Language, 1150–1250’, History of Political Thought, 10 (1989), 615–46.
Richard Dagger, ‘Rights’, in Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (Cambridge, 1989), p. 295.
Patrick Collinson, ‘Religion and Human Rights: The Case of and for Protestantism’, in Olwen Hufton (ed.), Historical Change and Human Rights (New York, 1995), p. 39.
Richard Tuck, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge, 1979), p. 66.
Peter Jones, Rights (New York, 1994), pp. 73–4.
See the discussion in John Yolton, A Locke Dictionary (Oxford, 1990), pp. 242–3.
Bill of Rights, printed in Brian Blakely and Jacquelin Collins (eds), Documents in British History, 2 vols (New York, 1993), 2: 2–4.
See the discussion in Iain Hampshire-Monk, A History of Modern Political Thought (Oxford, 1992), esp. pp. 2–8.
Johann P. Sommerville, Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context (London, 1992), p. 41.
G. MacDonald Ross, Leibniz (Oxford, 1984), p. 26.
Leibniz, ‘The Common Concept of Justice’, in Patrick Riley (ed.), Leibniz: Political Writings (Cambridge, 1988), p. 47.
Filmer, ‘Observations Concerning the Original of Government’, in Johann P. Sommerville (ed.), Patriarcha and Other Writings (Cambridge, 1991), p. 184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 W. M. Spellman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spellman, W.M. (1998). The Emergence of the Modern State. In: European Political Thought 1600–1700. European Culture and Society. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27200-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27200-6_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-67604-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27200-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)