Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Culture and Society ((EUROCS))

  • 52 Accesses

Abstract

While writers in ancien régime France did not use the word absolutisme to describe their government, apologists for the great revolution during the decade of the 1790s found this neologism to be an accurate assessment of the monarchical political order that was overthrown by a newly liberated and enlightened people.1 Indeed French absolutism was in some respects ‘defined to fit the case of Louis XIV, making the word synonymous with the alleged innovations and policies of one man, instead of regarding it as ‘a broad historic phenomenon’.2 The word first made its appearance in England even later, in the radical literature of the 1830s.3 But in seventeenth-century England, doctrines of absolute sovereignty were very often associated by its critics with the narrow power-seeking interests of the Stuart monarchy and the privileged clergy in the state-supported Church of England. In either case monarchical absolutism was pejoratively linked with unlimited power, tyranny, despotism, fanaticism, the rule of one against the interests of the many. Until recently some historians have been willing to accept the harsh judgement registered by the French revolutionaries and English radicals against the first promoters of the idea of absolutism, while accepting the notion that absolutist forms of government enjoyed their definitive flowering in the seventeenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Quoting Herbert H. Rowen, ‘Louis XIV and Absolutism’ in John C. Rule (ed.), Louis XIV and the Craft of Kingship (Columbus, OH, 1969), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perry Anderson, Lineages of the Absolutist State (London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See also James Anderson and Stuart Hill, ‘Absolutism and Other Ancestors’, in Anderson (ed.), The Rise of the Modern State (Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1986), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. C. B. MacPherson (Harmondsworth, 1968), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bodin, The Six Books of a Commonweal, trans. Richard Knolles (London, 1606), ed. K. D. McRae (Cambridge, MA, 1962), p. 84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Nanerl Keohane, Philosophy and the State in France: the Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ, 1980), p. 18;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Francis Oakley, Omnipotence, Covenant and Order (Ithaca, NY, 1984), p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harrington, Oceana, in J. G. A. Pocock (ed.), The Political Works of James Harrington (Cambridge, 1977), p. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in Roland Mousnier, The Institutions of France under the Absolute Monarchy, 1598–1789, 2 vols, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Chicago, 1979–84), 2:657.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For coverage of these issues, see Richard Bonney, Political Change in France under Richelieu and Mazarin, 1624–1661 (Oxford, 1978);

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geoffrey Treasure, Cardinal Richelieu and the Development of Absolutism (New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Philip Longworth, ‘The Emergence of Absolutism in Russia’, in Miller (ed.), Absolutism, pp. 175–93. See also Longworth, Alexis, Tsar of all the Russias (New York, 1984),

    Google Scholar 

  13. and Paul Dukes, The Making of Russian Absolutism, 1613–1801 (New York, 1982), pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Durand, ‘What is Absolutism’, in Ragnhild Hatton (ed.), Louis XIV and Absolutism (Columbus, OH, 1976), pp. 19–21;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herbert W. Rowan, ‘Kingship and Republicanism in the Seventeenth Century’, in Charles H. Carter (ed.), From the Renaissance to the Counter-Reformation (New York, 1965), p. 424.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wootton, Divine Right, p. 24. For background on this period see, more generally, Derik Hirst, Authority and Conflict: England, 1603–1658 (New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. and J. P. Kenyon, Stuart England (Harmondsworth, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiernan, State and Society, p. 30. See also Henry Kamen, Golden Age Spain (Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1988), pp. 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For a useful discussion of Spain’s position relative to the other great powers at this juncture, see Paul Kennedy, Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York, 1989), pp. 31–72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Margaret Judson, The Crisis of the Constitution, 1603–1645 (New York, 1964, first published 1949), p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. H. Greenleaf, Order, Empiricism and Politics (Oxford, 1964), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See also Glenn Burgess, The Politics of the Ancient Constitution: An Introduction to English Political Thought, 1603–1642 (London, 1992), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. V. Wedgewood, Strafford, 1593–1641 (London, 1935), p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quoting Antony Black, Monarchy and Community: Political Ideas in the Later Conciliar Controversy (Cambridge, 1970), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Francisco Suarez, A Defense of the Catholic and Apostolic Faith against the Errors of the Anglican Sect (1612) in Selections from Three Works, 2 vols, trans. G. L. Williams (Oxford, 1944), 2:697.

    Google Scholar 

  26. James I, The Political Works of James I, ed. Charles H. MacIlwain (New York, 1965, first published 1946), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  27. William of Ockham, ‘Eight Questions on the Power of the Pope’, in Ockham, A Letter to the Friars Minor and Other Writings, ed. A. S. McGrade, trans. John Kilcullen (Cambridge, 1995), pp. 303–33.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roland Mousnier, The Assassination of Henry IV, trans. Joan Spencer (New York, 1973), pp. 161–2.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Judson, Crisis, p. 149. Cf. Glenn Burgess, Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution (New Haven, CT, 1996), esp. ch.2.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quoted in J. H. Shennan, Government and Society in France, 1461–1661 (New York, 1969), pp. 82–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett (Cambridge, 1965), 1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bossuet, Politics Drawn from the Very Word of Holy Scripture, ed. and trans. Patrick Riley (Cambridge, 1990), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. M. Kelly, A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Oxford, 1992), pp. 57–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cicero, De Legibus, trans. C. W. Keys (Cambridge, MA, 1961, first published 1928), 1.6.18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kelly, Western Legal Theory, p. 103. See also Donald R. Kelley, The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA, 1990), pp. 68–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernice Hamilton, Political Thought in Sixteenth-Century Spain (Oxford, 1963), pp. 28–9.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. P. Sommerville, Politics and Ideology in England, 1603–1640 (New York, 1986), pp. 14–15; Friedrich, Age of the Baroque, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Preston King, The Ideology of Order: a Comparative Analysis of Jean Bodin and Thomas Hobbes (New York, 1974), p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kenneth D. McRae (ed.), The Six Books of a Republic (Cambridge, MA, 1962), p. A63.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Richard Baxter, A Holy Commonwealth, ed. William Lamont (Cambridge, 1994), p. 124.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Bodin, Six Books, in Julian Franklin (ed.), Bodin On Sovereignty (Cambridge, 1992), p. 86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Julian Franklin (trans, and ed.), Constitutionalism and Resistance in the Sixteenth Century: Three Treatises by Hotman, Beza, and Mornay (New York, 1969), pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Locke, Two Treatises, 2:200. Robert Zaller, ‘The Tyrant in English Revolutionary Thought’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 54 (1993), 589–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Johann P. Sommerville, ‘James I and the divine right of Kings’, in Linda Levy Peck (ed.), The Mental World of the Jacobean Court (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Johann P. Sommerville (ed.), King James VI and I: Political Writings (Cambridge, 1994), pp. xv–xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Robert Filmer, Patriarcha, in J.P. Sommerville (ed.), Patriarcha and Other Writings (Cambridge, 1991), p. 2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Gordon Schochet, Patriarchalism in Political Thought (New York, 1975), pp. 63, 73; Sommerville, Politics and Ideology, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Patrick Riley (ed.), Politics Drawn from the Very Word of Holy Scripture (Cambridge, 1991), p. xv.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Christopher Hill, The Bible and the Seventeenth-Century Revolution (Harmondsworth, 1994), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Saravia quoted in Johan P. Sommerville, Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context (London, 1992), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 W. M. Spellman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spellman, W.M. (1998). Contours of Absolute Monarchy. In: European Political Thought 1600–1700. European Culture and Society. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27200-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics