Skip to main content

Russian Journalism’s Time of Troubles

  • Chapter
Book cover From Glasnost to the Internet
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

The battering endured by Russian journalism in the last eight years goes way beyond anything experienced by their Western colleagues. True, the introduction of new technologies in Britain was bitterly resisted, with ugly scenes of public disorder, but such opposition did not take place in conditions of political and constitutional collapse. Russian journalism’s problems go much further than the need to grapple with new technologies. Journalists have been caught up in sweeping and often violent change, as well as being beset by powerful corporate and criminal interests, the two frequently being indistinguishable from one another. Four main challenges can be noted. The first has been the need to find a new set of political principles to replace the coerced certainties of Marxist-Leninist ideology; a thoroughly discredited and bankrupt ideology, to be sure, but one whose replacement with the principles of liberal democracy has turned out to be fraught with difficulties, as Soviet journalists themselves have discovered in their metamorphoses to Russian journalists. The notion of a tabula rasa is beguiling but illusory. The past does not easily relinquish its grip, as the Bolsheviks discovered after 1917. The second challenge is to be found in the nature of the new vested interests, corporate and criminal that are fighting to control, among other things, the huge advertising revenues of the electronic media.

Political control over mass media in Russia occurs in the forms of prior restraint, pre- and post-publication pressure and censorship; government and corporate secrecy; state and corporate advertising and lying.

Mikhail Gulyaev

If newspapers are useful in overthrowing tyrants, it is only to establish a tyranny of their own.

James Fenimore Cooper

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Frances Foster, ‘Izvestiya as a Mirror of Russian Legal Reform: Press, Law and Crisis in the Post-Soviet Era’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 26, 1993, p. 675. Quoted by Monroe Price, Television, the Public Sphere, and National Identity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. I. Bakshtanovskiy et al., Stanovlenie dukha korporatsii: pravila chest-noy igry v soobshchestve zhurnalistov, Nachalo-Press, Moscow, 1995. These remarks are taken from the editorial introduction, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iosif Dzyaloshinskiy, Rossiyskiy zhurnalist v posttotalitarnuyu epokhu: nekotorye osobennosti lichnosti i professional’noy deyatel’nosti, Vostok, Moscow, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Aleksey Simonov (ed.), Zhurnalisty na chechenskoy voyne: Fakty, Dokumenty, Svidetel’stva, November 1994-December 1995, Prava cheloveka, Moscow, 1995. In his introductory remarks Simonov observes that Tiredness is the mother of despair’ (p. 9). He argues that the state of tiredness works in favour of the authorities who through various bureaucratic devices and procedures are trying to wear journalists down. Also, according to Simonov, the Russian state, having declared its belief in the freedom of the word, is nevertheless waging a war against journalists with the intention of limiting the very freedom of the word it claims to uphold. Simonov also contends — and it is difficult to disagree with him — that in the Chechen war Russian journalists have defended and upheld their journalistic freedoms, a fact supported by the numbers of deaths and wounded. The Chechen war has proved to be the first real test of the journalists’ freedoms and the willingness (or lack of) of the government to guarantee them in a conflict situation after the fall of the Soviet Union.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Aleksey Simonov (ed.), Presledovanie zhurnalistov i pressy na territorii byvshego SSSR v 1994 godu, Moskovskaya Pravda, Moscow, 1995, pp. 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Consider the case of the British Guardian’s Richard Gott, who in 1994 was identified as being a KGB agent of influence (agent vliyaniya). See Alisdair Palmer, ‘How the KGB ran the Guardian’s Features Editor’, The Spectator, 10.12.94., pp. 9–12. For a discussion of Soviet front organizations in the West see Clive Rose, The Soviet Propaganda Network: A Directory of Organisations Serving Soviet Foreign Policy, Pinter Publishers, London and St Martin’s Press, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erskine, quoted in F. Knight Hunt, The Fourth Estate: Contributions Towards a History of Newspapers and of the Liberty of the Press, vol 1., David Bogue, 86 Fleet Street, London, 1850, p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Frank Ellis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellis, F. (1999). Russian Journalism’s Time of Troubles. In: From Glasnost to the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27076-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics