Skip to main content

High Modernism? Or Modernism in Crisis?

  • Chapter
Modernism in Art, Design and Architecture
  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

The end of the Second World War (1939–45) saw a Europe of devastated cities and tens of millions dead. At the heart of European culture was the awareness that it had witnessed the most appalling atrocities, that had only finished when the United States added to the catalogue of horrors by using the atom bomb to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Logistically, and morally, Europe could no longer claim to be the centre of global communications and its colonial infrastructure, whilst theoretically intact, was destined for disintegration. The Modernist desire for a functional rationality had been reduced to the ability to dispassionately commit mass murder; the desire for liberation through technology had ended in the industrial efficiency of the Nazi death camps like Auschwitz. Far from the Futurist vision of cultures ultimately cleansed by war, the culmination of the Second World War, first in Europe and then in South East Asia, simply led to further global, lower-level armed conflicts, as relationships between the United States and the USSR turned into an ideological struggle called the Cold War.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See R. Krauss (1986) The Originality of the Avant-Garde and other Modernist Myths, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ‘Avant Garde and Kitsch’ in C. Greenberg (1965) Art and Culture, Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Newman (1948) ‘The Sublime is Now’ in H. Chipp (ed.) (1968) Theories of Modern Art, University of California Press, p. 553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See M. Tuchman (1970) The New York School, Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Greenberg ‘The Situation at the Moment’ in S. Gilbaut (1983) How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art , Chicago University Press, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Dondero (1949) ‘Modern Art Shackled to Communism’ in Chipp, Theories of Modern Art, p. 497.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted in M. Tuchman (1970) The New York School, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ‘David J. Clarke has established that his popular fad for “Oriental thought” swept a whole generation of American artists from the mid-1940s to the mid-1960s.’ B. Winter (1994) ‘Japanese Thematics in Postwar American Art’ in A. Munroe (ed.) Japanese Art After 1945, Abrams, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Yoshihara (1955) ‘Gutai Art Manifesto’ in Munroe, Japanese Art After1945, p. 370.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Rose (1975) American Art Since 1900, Thames & Hudson, p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See T. Wolf (1975) The Painted Word, Bantam for a particularly vitriolic set of observations about this issue.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Teague (1948) Design This Day , Studio, p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibid., p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Laban (1982) Chrome. Glamour Cars of the Fifties, Orbis, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Papanek (1971) Design for the Real World, Thames & Hudson, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Fuller (1959)’ The Comprehensive Man’ in J. Meller (ed.) (1970) The Buckminster Fuller Reader, Cape, pp. 333–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. ‘The Ford directors and stockholders at the meeting and the thousands of tourists who came to see it were enchanted by the Rotunda Dome. Seen under the clear fibreglass cover against the blue of the sky, the lacy network of concentric rings balancing compressional and tensional forces in elegant mathematical perfection of structure had the ephemeral grace of a gigantic spiderweb.’ A. Hatch (1974) Buckminster Fuller, Crown, p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See K. Swolf (trans.) (1950) The Sociology of Georg Simmel, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Debord (1970) Society of the Spectacle, Black & Red, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid., p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1999 Christopher Crouch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crouch, C. (1999). High Modernism? Or Modernism in Crisis?. In: Modernism in Art, Design and Architecture. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27058-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics