Skip to main content

Quangos and Local Democracy

  • Chapter
Quangos, Accountability and Reform

Abstract

This chapter starts by recognizing that a range of appointed bodies and quangos play a substantial role in the governance of local communities. The strengths and weaknesses of such a position are then briefly reviewed. As a result three areas of possible reform are identified and examined: procedural reforms to ensure openness and fairness in the conduct of the affairs of these publicly funded organizations; institutional changes and developments in policy processes to tackle the problems of fragmentation and co-ordination raised by the rise and spread of quangos; and democratic reforms to facilitate the political accountability of these non-elected institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Association of Metropolitan Authorities (1995) Changing the Face of Quangos(London: AMA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Local Democracy (1995) Taking Charge: The Rebirth of Local Democracy(London: CLD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. and Hoggett, P. (1995) ‘ Non-Elected Bodies and Local Governance’, in J. Stewart, A. Greer and P. Hoggett,The Quango State: An Alternative Approach, CLD Research Report No. 10 (London: Commission for Local Democracy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1995) ‘Quangos and Democratic Government’, in F. Ridley and D. Wilson (eds)The Quango Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 163–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogwood, B. and McVicar, M. (1996) ‘Agencies and Accountability’. Paper presented to ESRC Conference, 22–23 Manch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1996) TECs and Local Accountability: Options for Reform (London: Local Government Infonnation Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. and Day, D. (1987) Accountabilities in Five Public Services (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party (1995) Renewing Democracy, Rebuilding Communities (London: Labour Party).

    Google Scholar 

  • CM 3270–1 (1996) Second Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life (Nolan Report). Local Public Spending Bodies Volume 1: Report (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1996) Reforming the Local Appointed Boards (London: Local Government Information Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. (1995) Holding Quangos to Account (London: Local Government Information Unit).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1999 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stoker, G. (1999). Quangos and Local Democracy. In: Flinders, M.V., Smith, M.J. (eds) Quangos, Accountability and Reform. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27027-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics