Abstract
The empirical analysis of welfare policy, as argued in Part I, needs to be informed by competing theoretical interpretations of the nature of both the welfare state and policymaking. It also needs to be placed in historical context. It is all too tempting to consider the overall development of policy — or to judge the relative success or failure of an individual policy — in isolation and according to some internal logic. Indeed a belief in incrementalism encourages this. However, it must be recognised that welfare policy was subject to external forces to which successive governments, distracted by other problems, responded within the constraints of what was deemed to be administratively and politically possible. The purpose of this chapter is to identify these various constraints and influences. What, in particular, was the economic context in which welfare policy developed and to what demographic pressures was it subject? Who held political power and how did this affect the priority accorded to welfare policy? How did the machinery of government at a central, regional and local level adapt to the more positive welfare role which the state had assumed? How receptive was public opinion, as represented by vested interests and the electorate, to the duties as well as the rights imposed by state welfare?
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
D. Donnison, The Politics of Poverty (1982) p. 20.
C. Feinstein, National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom (1972), table 58.
J. E Ermisch, The Political Economy of Demographic Change (1983) p. 45.
P. Ely and D. Denney, Social Work in a Multi-Racial Society (Aldershot, 1987).
In the early 1960s the trade unions insisted on the retention of clause 4 either in response to their increasingly militant members or, purely defensively, to retain the historical link between the various factions of the Labour movement. See V. Bogdanor, ‘The Labour party in opposition, 1951–1964’, in V. Bogdanor and R. Skidelsky (eds), The Age of Affluence, 1951–64 (1970).
K. Morgan, Labour in Power, 1945–1951 (1984) p. 186. For the most sympathetic account of the Wilson governments, see B. Pimlott, Harold Wilson (1992).
T. Utley, Not Guilty (1957) p. 156.
H. Jones, ‘New tricks for an old dog? The Conservatives’ social policy, 1951–5’, in A. Gorst et al. (eds), Contemporary British History, 1931–1961 (1991).
D. Kavanagh, ‘The Heath Government, 1970–1974’, in P. Hennessy and A. Seldon (eds), Ruling Performance (Oxford, 1987) p. 234.
S. Ball and A. Seldon (eds), The Heath Government, 1970–1974: a reappraisal (1996), which includes a chapter on the planning and implementation of social policy.
C. A. R. Crosland, The Conservative Enemy (1962) p. 123;
R. Lowe, ‘The Second World War, consensus and the foundation of the Welfare State’, Twentieth Century British History, 1 (1990) 152–82.
G. K. Fry, Reforming the Civil Service: the Fulton Committee on the British Home Civil Service, 1966–1968 (Edinburgh, 1993).
D. Marquand, The Unprincipled Society (1988) p. 26;
A. Booth, ’“The Keynesian revolution” in economic policy making’, Economic History Review, 36 (1983) 118;
P. Hennessy, Whitehall (1989) p. 235.
P. Hennessy, Whitehall (1989) pp. 88 and 135.
A major failure of the British Treasury was the refusal to discuss the constructive relationship between social and economic policy and the social consequences of taxation when the opportunity arose between 1955 and 1957. See R. Lowe, ‘Resignation at the Treasury’, Journal of Social Policy, 18 (1989) 520–3.
K. Newton and T. Karran, The Politics of Local Expenditure (1985) p. 52.
R. Jackman, ‘Local government finance’, in M. Loughlin et al. (eds), Half a Century of Municipal Decline (1985) Ch. 7.
A. G. Geen, ‘Educational policy-making in Cardiff, 1944–70’, Public Administration, 59 (1981) 85–104;
M. Kogan (ed.), The Politics of Education (1971) p. 48.
D. Birrell and A. Murie, ‘Ideology, conflict and social policy’, Journal of Social Policy, 4 (1975) 251;
J. Ditch, Social Policy in Northern Ireland between 1939–1950 (Avebury, 1988) p. xi.
J. G. Kellas, The Scottish Political System (Cambridge, 1975) p. 308.
I. Levitt, ‘The origins of the Scottish Development Bond’, Scottish Affairs 14 (1996) 55;
L. Paterson, The Autonomy of Scotland (Edinburgh, 1994) p. 130.
J. Murphy, British Social Services: the Scottish dimension (Edinburgh, 1992).
A. Gibb, ‘Policy and politics in Scottish housing since 1945’, in R. Rodger (ed.), Scottish Housing in the Twentieth Century (Leicester, 1989) p. 167.
R. M. Titmuss, Problems of Social Policy (1950) p. 434.
P. Addison, The Road to 1945 (1975) p. 15.
D. E. Butler and A. King, The British General Election of 1964 (1965) Chs 4–5.
D. Butler and D. Stokes, Political Change in Britain (1974) p. 297.
M. Pinto-Duschinsky, ‘Bread and circuses? The Conservatives in office, 1951–1964’, in V. Bogdanor and R. Skidelsky (eds), The Age of Affluence (1970) p. 77.
R. Lowe, ‘The Second World War, consensus and the foundation of the Welfare State’, Twentieth Century British History, 1 (1990) 178–9.
D. Marquand, The Unprincipled Society (1988) p. 224.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 Rodney Lowe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lowe, R. (1999). The Historical Context. In: The Welfare State in Britain since 1945. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27012-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27012-5_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-72138-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27012-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)