Abstract
The Conservative schism over the Corn Law question, and the fall of Peel’s ministry, inaugurated a period of confusion and instability in British party politics which extended well beyond Peel’s death in July 1850. For the last four years of his life, Peel’s determination to occupy an independent position, free from party associations and obligations, did more than anything else to perpetuate the incoherence of the political scene at Westminster. Some contemporaries, indeed, felt that he was guilty of inconsistency in the way he behaved. On the one hand, Peel repeatedly asserted to his friends that he had no wish to return to office, and yet, on the other hand, he evidently had no intention of retiring from political life, as he retained his seat in the House of Commons and regularly attended and spoke in the debates.1 Complete uncertainty therefore surrounded the intentions of Peel and his Free Trade Conservative followers: would they seek a rapprochement with the main body of Conservatives, or else gravitate towards Lord John Russell’s Whig government (which had replaced Peel’s ministry in June 1846), or at least organise themselves into a proper third party, until their political destiny became clearer? In practice, Peel was unwilling to countenance any of these courses of action, and this guaranteed that no government could possibly be formed on secure parliamentary foundations.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For Whig—Peelite relations, see J. B. Conacher, The Peelites and the Party System, 1846–1852 (Newton Abbot, 1972 ), pp. 35–46.
Valerie Pirie (adapted), A Frenchman sees the English in the ‘Fifties (London, 1935), pp. 263–4.
W. H. Lyttelton to Sir Charles Bagot, 18 October 1822, in Josceline Bagot, George Canning and his Friends (London, 1909 ), vol. 2, pp. 134–5.
D. O. Maddyn, Chiefs of Parties (London, 1859 ), vol. 2, pp. 26–31.
James Grant, Random Recollections of the House of Commons (London, 1836), pp. 105–22.
G. H. Francis, Orators of the Age (London, 1847 ), pp. 23–42.
Arbuthnot to Wellington, 26 March 1835, in R. J. Olney and Julia Melvin (eds), Wellington II: Political Correspondence November 1834 April 1835 (Historical Manuscripts Commission, 1986 ), pp. 561–2.
See, for example, Henry Brougham to Thomas Creevey, 19 and 21 August 1822, in Sir Herbert Maxwell, The Creevey Papers (London, 1903 ), vol. 2, pp. 44–5.
See Norman Gash, Sir Robert Peel: The Life of Sir Robert Peel after 1830 (London, 1972), pp. 666–9.
A. A. W. Ramsay, Sir Robert Peel (London, 1928); G. Kitson Clark, Peel and the Conservative Party: A Study in Party Politics, 1832–1841 (London, 1929 ).
Derek Beales, ‘Peel, Russell and Reform’, Historical Journal, XVII (1974), pp. 873–82.
V. A. C. Gatrell, The Hanging Tree: Execution and the English People, 17701868 (Oxford, 1994 ), pp. 554–85.
Boyd Hilton, The Gallows and Mr Peel’, in T. Blanning and D. Cannadine (eds), History and Biography (Cambridge, 1996 ), pp. 88–112.
Robert Stewart, The Foundation of the Conservative Party, 1830–1867 (London, 1978), pp. 151–65; Ian Newbould, ‘Sir Robert Peel and the Conservative Party, 1832–1841: A Study in Failure?’, English Historical Review XCVIII (1983), pp. 529–57.
Boyd Hilton, ‘Peel: A Reappraisal’, Historical Journal, XXII (1979), pp. 585–614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1999 T. A. Jenkins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jenkins, T.A. (1999). Peel’s Achievement. In: Sir Robert Peel. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27008-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27008-8_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-68754-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-27008-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)