Skip to main content

Interest Groups and Transport Policy

  • Chapter
Book cover Transport Policy in Britain

Part of the book series: Public Policy and Politics ((PPP))

  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

Central and local governments, Parliament and European Union institutions are formal actors in the British policy-making process, given express authority to make decisions. Trying to influence these structures of elected representative democracy are the informal actors called interest groups, pressure groups or lobbying groups. They are often divided into two categories: ‘sectional’ groups — that is, groups defending or expressing the ‘self-interest’ of their section of society, such as the Freight Transport Association (FTA), rail workers’ unions, and the Cement and Concrete Association; and ‘promotional’ or ‘cause’ groups, which promote changes in attitudes or in policies that affect the general public, such as Transport 2000, which campaigns for increased public transport provision, and Friends of the Earth, or the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. However, to make rigid distinctions in interest-group politics is to miss much of the action. First, many ‘self-interested’ groups would argue they also promote the wider public interest, not only when they take up outside causes (as the RAC did over coach seat-belts), but even in promoting their own interests, if they contribute to national economic growth. to national economic growth. Second, ‘cause’ groups may be supported primarily by sections of society whose interests they promote.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Alderman, G. (1984) Pressure Groups and Government in Britain (Harlow: Longman) — with many examples on transport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (1995) Pressure Groups: Politics and Democracy, 2nd edn (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974) Power: A Radical View (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (1992) Policy Networks in British Government (Oxford: OUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B. (1996) Twyford Down: Roads, Campaigning and Environmental Law (London: Spon) — an informed, clear analysis of how a road project was decided from the point of view of its opponents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wistrich, E. (1983) The Politics of Transport (Harlow: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, M. (1987) Wheels within Wheels (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul) — a polemical account of the pro-roads lobby.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Stephen Glaister, June Burnham, Handley Stevens and Tony Travers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glaister, S., Burnham, J., Stevens, H., Travers, T. (1998). Interest Groups and Transport Policy. In: Transport Policy in Britain. Public Policy and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27002-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics