Theatre Praxis pp 174-192 | Cite as

Melodrama and Methodism: An Approach Through Practice

  • Peter Thomson
Part of the New Directions in Theatre book series (NDT)


The relationship between academic research and workshop sessions is not a relaxed one, but there are occasions when it may be uniquely dynamic. The project I will be describing in this chapter was, for me, one such occasion. What had begun in my head as the inkling of a perception was tested and, to a measurable extent, validated through the skills and experience of a group of students. The association of melodrama and Methodism that I shall be proposing is based on two claims, neither of which I have room to argue fully. The first is that the study of drama invites from its teachers an investment in a visceral pedagogy whose outcome for the student is by no means always predictable. The second, more contentious perhaps, is that the popularity of melodrama in nineteenth-century Britain was culturally aligned with the mingled guilt and hopefulness of salvationary Nonconformism. My immediate purpose is to describe a drama project which attempted to explore the propriety of the second claim in such a way as to advance the first. At the time, it had some of the anxiety-creating uncertainties of a genuine melodrama.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  1. Arnold, M. (1935) Culture and Anarchy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Bierce, A. (1993) The Devil’s Dictionary. Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, G. K. (1962) The Making of Victorian England. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  4. Craig, E. G. (1930) Henry Irving. J. M. Dent and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  5. Dingwall, E. J. (1947) Some Human Oddities. Home & Van Thal, London.Google Scholar
  6. Francis, H. and Smith, D. (1980) The Fed. Lawrence and Wishart, London.Google Scholar
  7. Irving, L. (1951) Henry Irving: The Actor and His World. Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
  8. Obelkevich, J. (1990) ‘Religion’, in The Cambridge Social History of Britain 1750–1950, ed. F. M. L. Thompson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, vol. 3, pp. 311–56.Google Scholar
  9. St. John, C. (ed.) (1931) Ellen Terry and Bernard Shaw: A Correspondence. Constable & Co., London.Google Scholar
  10. Swears, H. (1939) ‘Irving as Synorix’, in We Saw Him Act: A Symposium on the Art of Sir Henry Irving, eds H. A. Saintsbury and C. Palmer. Hurst & Blackett, London, pp. 191–6.Google Scholar
  11. Talmage, T. De Witt (n.d.) Sports that Kill. James Blackwood & Co., London.Google Scholar
  12. Young, H. (1989) One of Us. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Thomson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations