Skip to main content

Statistical Analysis

  • Chapter
Comparative Politics

Part of the book series: Comparative Government and Politics ((CGP))

  • 256 Accesses

Abstract

We have been spending most of our space to this point in the book arguing that case-based analysis and other less formalised research techniques are important components of comparative political analysis. This discussion has been arguing implicitly that, despite its importance in the social sciences, statistical analysis is not everything, and that alternative methodologies do need to be considered and utilised when appropriate. It may not be everything, but statistical analysis is certainly something, and we should examine carefully what conventional statistical analysis can and cannot do to enhance comparative political research. The fundamental question, therefore, is whether comparative political analysis has characteristics that make the use of the conventional modes of statistical analysis less applicable than in other areas of research. Also, if there are impediments to using conventional analysis then are there means of amending the techniques to make them more useful for comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 B. Guy Peters

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, B.G. (1998). Statistical Analysis. In: Comparative Politics. Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26926-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics