Abstract
The year 792 was in many respects a critical one for Charles; not least because it saw the second major conspiracy of the reign, and the first in which a member of his own family was implicated. This was his eldest son, Pippin, usually if unkindly known from Einhard’s description of him as ‘Pippin the Hunchback’, who was born around 769. In the brief account of the conspiracy given in the Lorsch Annals, he is described as being Charles’s son by a concubine called Himiltrude.1 The author of these annals includes Charles’s sons by his ‘lawful’ wife amongst the planned targets for the conspirators. Einhard also calls Pippin illegitimate, and it is he alone who rightly or wrongly describes him as being hunchbacked. The Reviser, on the other hand, omits any reference to Pippin as being illegitimate or his half-brothers as being intended victims along with their father. There are indeed grounds for suspecting, from a letter of pope Stephen III sent to Charles and Carloman in the Summer of 770, protesting against the rumoured plan that one or other of them was going to marry the daughter of the Lombard king Desiderius, that one or both of the Frankish kings had previously been married and had put aside his wife in the interests of this new union.2 If that is true, it is quite possible that Charles had been married to Himiltrude prior to 770, and that Pippin was legitimate.3 It is certainly notable that he had been given the name of Charles’s own father, which from family tradition would imply at least provisional recognition of him as heir.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Janet Nelson, ‘La famille de Charlemagne’, Byzantion, 61 (1991), pp. 194–212.
Alf Uddholm (ed.), Marculfi Formularum Libri Duo (Uppsala, 1962).
Susan Reynolds, Fiefs and Vassals (Oxford, 1994), pp. 17–47.
J. M. Wallace-Hadrill, Early Germanic Kingship (Oxford, 1971), p. 118.
H.-X. Arquillière, L’Augustinisme politique (2nd edn, Paris, 1972), pp. 156–69.
André Grabar, L’Iconoclasme byzantin (2nd edn, Paris, 1984).
Robin Cormack, Writing in Gold: Byzantine Society and its Icons (London, 1985), chs 3 and 4.
Warren Treadgold, The Byzantine Revival 780–842 (Stanford, 1988), pp. 75–89.
Mark Whittow, The Making of Orthodox Byzantium, 600–1025 (Basingstoke, 1996), pp. 149–50.
Ann Freeman, ‘Theodulf of Orleans and the Libri Carolim, Speculum, 32 (1957), pp. 663–705.
J. M. Wallace-Hadrill, The Frankish Church (Oxford, 1983), pp. 217–25.
Ann Freeman, ‘Carolingian Orthodoxy and the Fate of the Libri Carolini’, Viator, 16 (1985), pp. 65–108.
K. J. Conant, Carolingian and Romanesque Architecture (2nd edn, Harmondsworth, 1966), pp. 51–3.
R. Krautheimer, Rome. Profile of a City, 312–1308 (Princeton, 1980), pp. 33–58.
C. Rauch and H. J. Jacobi, Ausgrabungen in der Königspflaz Ingelheim 1909–1914 (Mainz, 1976).
Jörg Jamut, ‘Die frühmittelalterliche Jagd unter rechts- und sozialgeschichtlichen Aspekten’, Settimane, 31 (1985), pp. 765–808.
M. Balzer, ‘Paderborn als karolingischer Pfalzort’, Deutsche Königspfalzen, 3 (1979), pp. 9–85.
Karl Hauck, ‘Karl als neuer Konstantin 777. Die archäologischen Entdeckungen in Paderborn in historischer Sicht’, FS, 20 (1986), pp. 513–40.
Copyright information
© 1998 Roger Collins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Collins, R. (1998). Frankfurt and Aachen, 792–4. In: Charlemagne. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26924-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26924-2_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-65055-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26924-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)