Skip to main content

State, Market Governance, and Particularistic Interests: The Political Economy of Capture

  • Chapter
Industrial Crisis and the Open Economy

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate the power of particularistic interests in the policy-making processes which govern the overall pattern of distributional conflict in the textile and clothing sector. In this sense it will build on the analysis of the material economic base underpinning these conflicts of interest which was presented in Chapters 1 and 2. To accomplish this, the chapter will examine the political strength of the textile and clothing sector in the UK and the US, and will then look in detail at the pattern of state-industry relations in the French sector. The French case provides evidence of how textile interests were able to dominate and indeed ‘capture’ the policy agenda, a detailed and extended example of the political economy of capture.1 The employers’ organisations were able to commandeer industrial and trade policy resources and so as to attenuate the impact of rising import competition, a process repeated across a broad range of industrialised economies, demonstrating the ways in which policy processes are part of market structuration. The chapter will then demonstrate how a very different industrial culture and pattern of interest intermediation in Italy led to a dynamic strategy of successful market-led adjustment to the new transnational competitive pressures of the global market. Italian firms organised themselves so as to increase their competitiveness through a collectively sponsored strategy of flexible specialisation and became the leading textile and clothing exporters in the global economy. The associational patterns and mechanisms of state-industry relations were crucial to this outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. There are typically two notions of ‘capture’ in the literature. In some cases associated with the public choice literature, regulatory capture is used to illustrate the somewhat dogmatic point that regulatory regimes are initiated to serve the regulated. A second notion of capture, and the one employed here, denotes cases where a particular set of interests in the political economy acquire excessive influence over the official bodies, supposed guardians of the ‘public interest’, to which they are in theory subject. In these cases, the institutions of state and the definition of the public interest is effectively appropriated by private interests in limited regulatory domains, but this situation is far from inevitable. See William W. Bratton and Joseph A. McCahery, ‘Regulatory Competition, Regulatory Capture, and Corporate Self-regulation’, North Carolina Law Review, vol. 73/5, June 1995, pp. 1903–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a more conceptual discussion of patterns of interest intermediation in relation to the textile and clothing sector, see Geoffrey R.D. Underhill, ‘Neo-Corporatist Theory and the Politics of Industrial Decline’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 16, 1988, pp. 489–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrew Martin, ‘Political Constraints on Economic Strategies in Advanced Industrial States’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, October 1977, p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Martin Wolf, Hans H. Glismann, Joseph Selzman and Dean Spinanger, Costs of Protecting Jobs in Textiles and Clothing (London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1984), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See discussion in Richard Friman, Patchwork Protectionism: Textile Trade Policy in the United States, Japan, and West Germany (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990), pp. 65–71

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lane Steven Hurewitz, Textiles, a volume in the series The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History, ed. Terence P. Stewart (Deventer/Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation, 1993), p. 68

    Google Scholar 

  7. See William R. Cline, The Future of World Trade in Textiles and Apparel (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1990), pp. 208–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Caroline Miles, ‘Protection in the British Textile Industry’, in W.M. Corden and G. Fels (eds), Public Assistance to Industry: Protection and Subsidies in Britain and Germany (London: Macmillan, 1976), pp. 184–214.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Janet Walsh, ‘The Performance of UK Textiles and Clothing: Recent Controversies and Evidence’, International Review of Applied Economics, 5/3, 1991, pp. 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See the example of Courtaulds, in Arthur Knight, Private Enterprise and Public Intervention: The Courtaulds Experience (London: Allen & Unwin, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.P. Hayes, Making Trade Policy in the European Community (London: Macmillan/Trade Policy Research Centre, 1993), p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See for example William Lazonick, ‘The Cotton Industry’, in B. Elbaum and W. Lazonick (eds), The Decline of the British Economy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), pp. 18–50

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yves Mény and Vincent Wright, La Crise de la sidérurgie, Européenne 1974–1984 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1985), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a general historical account of the emergence of the French patronat, see Jean Lambert, Le Patron (Brussels: Bloud and Gay, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marcel Boussac, for instance, was reluctant to engage in restructuring which would result in large-scale redundancies in the small Vosges communities in which his factories were located and toward which he felt a paternal responsibility. These attitudes had their origins in the last century. With respect to the paternalism of the textile families of the Nord, see P. Pierrard, Histoire du Nord (Paris: Hachette 1978, pp. 359–60)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erhard Friedberg, L’Etat et l’industrie en France: rapport d’enquête (Paris: CNRS, Groupe Sociologie des Organisations, mimeo 1976), pp. 119–21.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chris Farrands, ‘Textile Diplomacy: The Making and Implementation of European Textile Policy 1974–1978’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. XVIII, no. 1, September 1979, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. René Mouriaux Les Syndicats dans la société française, Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Philip M. Williams, Crisis and Compromise: Politics in the Fourth Republic (London: Longman, 1972), p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lynn Krieger Mytelka, ‘The French Textile Industry — Crisis and Adjustment’, in Harold K. Jacobson and Dusan Sidjanski (eds), The Emerging International Economic Order: Dynamic Processes, Constraints, and Opportunities (Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982), p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See the strong-state-weak-state argument formulated by Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), Between Power and Plenty (Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Atkinson and W.D. Coleman, ‘Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 19, no. 1, January 1989, pp. 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benoît Boussemart and Jean-Claude Rabier, Le Dossier Agache-Willot: un capitalisme à contre-courant (Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, 1983), p. 156

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Geoffrey R.D. Underhill, ‘When Technology Doesn’t Mean Change: Industrial Adjustment and Textile Production in France’, in Michael Talalay, Chris Farrands and Roger Tooze (eds), Technology, Culture, and Competitiveness in the World Political Economy (London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 139–50.

    Google Scholar 

  25. State intervention in the sector tended to be either general measures such as support for employment levels in industry or regional subsidies, or related to ‘lifesaving’ for firms in crisis. The textile and clothing sector was never regarded by the state as one of strategic importance. See Pierre Dubois and Giusto Barisi, Le Défi technologique dans l’industrie de l’habillement: les stratégies des entrepreneurs français et italiens (Paris: CNRS, Groupe Sociologie du Travail, 1982), pp. 45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. Moati and E.M. Mouhoud, ‘Information et organisation de la production: vers une division cognitive du travail’, Economie appliquée, vol. XLVI, no. 1, 1994, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Giorgio Barba Navaretti and Giorgio Perosino, ‘Redeployment of Production, Trade Protection, and Firms’ Global Strategies: The Case of Italy’, in G.B. Navaretti, R. Faini, and Aubrey Silbertson (eds), Beyond the Multifibre Arrangement: Third World Competition and Restructuring Europe’s Textile Industry (Paris: OECD, 1995), p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Pyke, G. Becattini and W. Sengenberger (eds), Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy (Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  29. See M. Piore and C. Sabel, The Second Industrial Divide (New York: Free Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Theda Skocpol and Ellen Kay Trimberger, ‘Revolutions and the World-Historical Development of Capitalism’, in Barbara Hockey Kaplan (ed.), Social Change in the Capitalist World Economy (London: Sage 1978), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Geoffrey R. D. Underhill

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Underhill, G.R.D. (1998). State, Market Governance, and Particularistic Interests: The Political Economy of Capture. In: Industrial Crisis and the Open Economy. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26903-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics