Skip to main content

From Weber’s Political Sociology to Contemporary Liberal Democracy

  • Chapter
Max Weber, Democracy and Modernization

Abstract

This chapter will present an analytical overview of Weber’s political sociology and consider some contemporary extensions of his ideas. The problem with an all-encompassing overview is that Weber did not produce a systematic or complete political sociology. Instead, his writings contain a number of essays on a variety of topics which belong to what he called ‘Herrschaftssoziologie’, or the sociology of domination. Nevertheless, I think that we can find a coherent political sociology if we direct our attention to two areas that constitute the boundaries of the political realm; the system of states at one end, and the social groups which interlock with the state’s power — from below — at the other. Once we have identified the forces which operate at these two extremes, we will be able to focus on its core, the state itself. And within the discussion of the state, I will focus on Weber’s ideas about democracy and on his view of the relation between the political and the cultural and economic spheres. This overview of Weber’s political sociology will, in turn, make it possible to pursue some of the contemporary uses of his ideas in the second part of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beetham, David. 1985 Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, Stefan. 1991. Max Webers Herrschaftssoziologie. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, Stefan. 1994. Bürokratie und Charisma. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers. 1984. The Limits of Rationality: An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1986. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1993. ‘Maturation of the State-Centered Theory of Revolution and Ideology’. Sociological Theory 11(1), pp. 117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandeker, Christopher. 1990. Surveillance, Power and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. 1988. Plough, Sword and Book: The Structure of Human History. London: Collins Harvill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. 1992. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, Ernest. 1996. ‘Introduction’ in Ernest Gellner and Cesar Cansino, eds, Liberalism in Modern Times: Essays in Honour of Jose G. Merquior. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1968. Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1992. ‘The Emergence of Modern European Nationalism’ in John A. Hall and Ian Jarvie, eds, Transition to Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–65.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1996. ‘Authoritarian and Liberal Militarism: A Contribution from Comparative and Historical Sociology’ in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski, eds, International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 221–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1997. ‘Has Globalization Ended the Rise and Rise of the Nation-State?’, Review of International Political Economy 4(3), pp. 472–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merquior, J. G. 1980. Rousseau and Weber: Two Studies in the Theory of Legitimacy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Ralph. 1991. ‘“Personality” and “Inner Distance”: The Conception of the Individual in Max Weber’s Sociology’. History of the Human Sciences 4(1), pp. 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, Ralph. 1998. ‘Rethinking Nationalism in the Context of Globalization’ in Kevin Brehony, ed., Nationalism’s Futures. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, John D. 1993. ‘Capitalist Development and Democracy: Empirical Research on the Social Origins of Democracy’ in David Copp, Jean Hampton and John E. Roemer, eds, The Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Black-well.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda and Hobson, John. 1995. States and Economic Development. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Ralph Schroeder

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schroeder, R. (1998). From Weber’s Political Sociology to Contemporary Liberal Democracy. In: Schroeder, R. (eds) Max Weber, Democracy and Modernization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26836-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics