Abstract
As the negotiations to establish a new constitutional order in South Africa were underway during the period 1990 to 1994, over 16000 people were to lose their lives in violence which centred on KwaZulu-Natal and the Reef.1 In fact, in the transition period the violence claimed far more lives than did the fight against apartheid itself. Moreover, much of this violence was not directed against the state but took myriad forms; with people, overwhelmingly those whom apartheid designated ‘black’, being killed day and night in their homes, in trains and taxis, at work, on the street, during attendance at political rallies or funeral vigils, or whilst drinking in beer-halls. And the list of causes has been seen to be long. As one analyst has argued, the violence should be traced to the ‘presence of hostels, SDUs (Self Defence Units), proliferation of illegal arms, unrealistic political demands, “no-go” areas and political intolerance, economic competition between rival politicized taxi organizations, traditional hierarchical structures (chiefs), conflicts over control of land specifically tribal land, presence of “warlords/strongmen” in informal settlements, embittered and frustrated Afrikaners etc.’2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See, for example, T. Sisk, Democratization in South Africa: The Elusive Search for Peace, Princeton, 1995; C. Jung and I. Shapiro, ‘South Africa’s negotiated transition: democracy, opposition, and the new constitutional order’, Politics & Society, vol. 23, no. 3, 1995, pp. 269–308.
See, for example, A. Minnaar, ‘Political violence in South Africa’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 6, no. 3, 1994, pp. 389–99
M. Murray, The Revolution Deferred, Resolution: global London, 1994, chapter 5.
See, for example, M. Esman, Ethnic Politics, Resolution: global Ithaca and London, 1994, chapter 4.
A. J. Jeffery, ‘Spotlight on disinformation about violence in South Africa’, South African Institute of Race Relations, Spotlight, no. 8, 1992
D. Everatt, ‘Who is murdering the peace?’, Community Agency for Social Enquiry, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1991
Human Rights Commission, HRC Special Briefing on Massacres, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1992.
For further discussion, see R. Taylor and M. Shaw, ‘The Natal conflict’, in J. D. Brewer (ed.), Restructuring South Africa, Resolution: global London, 1994, pp. 35–52.
See, R. Taylor, ‘The myth of ethnic division: township conflict on the Reef’, Race & Class, vol. 33, no. 2, 1991, pp. 1–14.
M. E. Bennun, ‘Boipatong and after: reflections on the politics of violence in South Africa’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, vol. 21, no. 1, 1993, p. 56.
P. Trewhela, ‘Within the secret state: the Directorate of Military Intelligence’, Searchlight South Africa, no. 8, 1992, p. 19.
International Commission of Jurists, G. Bindman (ed.), South Africa: Human Rights and the Rule of Law, Resolution: global London, 1988
K. Grundy, The Militarization of South African Politics, Resolution: global London, 1986.
H. Adam and K. Moodley, The Negotiated Revolution, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1993, p. 126. Also see, A. Sparks, Tomorrow is Another Country: The Inside Story of South Africa’s Negotiated Revolution, Johannesburg, 1994, pp. 157–8; and Murray, The Revolution Deferred, pp. 87–9.
Jeffery,’ spotlight on disinformation’; J. Kane-Berman, Political Violence in South Africa, South African Institute of Race Relations, Johannesburg, 1993; P. Pereira, ‘The weight of no evidence’, South African Institute of Race Relations, Johannesburg, 1993. And see, for example, Goldstone Commission, Second Interim Report to the State President, 29 April 1992.
Bennun, ‘Boipatong and after’, p. 62. Also see, D. Everatt and S. Sadek, ‘The Reef violence: tribal war or total strategy?’, Community Agency for Social Enquiry, Johannesburg 1992, p. 3; G. Ellis, ‘“Third force”: what is the weight of evidence?’, South African Institute of Race Relations, Cape Western Region, Regional Topic Paper, no. 1, 1993; and Sisk, Democratization in South Africa, figure 3.1, p. 118.
See, A. Minnaar, I. Liebenberg and C. Schutte (eds.), The Hidden Hand: Covert Operations in South Africa, Resolution: global Pretoria, 1994.
M. Shaw, ‘Biting the bullet: negotiating democracy’s defence’, South African Review 7, Resolution: global Johannesburg 1994, pp. 228–56, and confidential interview material.
R. D. A. Henderson, ‘South African intelligence under De Klerk’, International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, vol. 8, no. 1, 1994, p. 60, emphasis added.
Institute for Futures Research, Stratcon Project: Perspectives on the Political Future of South Africa, Resolution: global University of Stellenbosch, 1987.
J. Pauw, In the Heart of the Whore: The Story of South Africa’s Death Squads, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1990
P. Laurence, Death Squads: Apartheid’s Secret Weapon, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1991.
J. Cole, Crossroads: The Politics of Reform and Repression 1976–1986, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1987
M. Kentridge, An Unofficial War: Inside the Conflict in Pietermaritzburg, Resolution: global Cape Town, 1990.
H. Giliomee and L. Schlemmer, From Apartheid to Nation-Building, Resolution: global Cape Town, 1989, p. 200.
F. Kitson, Low Intensity Operations: Subversion, Insurgency and Counter Insurgency, Resolution: global London, 1971. And see, W. Minter, Apartheid’s Contras: An Inquiry into the Roots of War in Angola and Mozambique, London, 1994.
Independent Board of Inquiry, Blood on the Tracks: A Special Report on Train Attacks, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1992.
S. Huntington, ‘How countries democratize’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 106, no. 4, 1992, pp. 579–616.
M. Shaw and J. Miller, Securing the Trains? An Analysis of Train Violence and the Goldstone Commission Reports, Resolution: global Institute for the Study of Public Violence, 1994, p. 10.
Human Rights Committee of South Africa, ‘Natal’s total onslaught’, Resolution: global Johannesburg, 1 June 1994.
See, for example, D. Ottaway, Chained Together: Mandela, De Klerk, and the Struggle to Remake South Africa, Resolution: global New York, 1993, p. 238.
J. D. Brewer, Black and Blue: Policing in South Africa, Resolution: global Oxford, 1994, p. 348.
G. Adler and E. Webster, ‘Challenging transition theory: the labor movement, radical reform, and transition to democracy in South Africa’, Politics & Society, vol. 23, no. 1, 1995, pp. 75–106; Jung and Shapiro,’ south Africa’s negotiated transition’
H. Giliomee, ‘Democratization in South Africa’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 110, no. 1, 1995, pp. 83–104. Contrast this with how T. R. Gurr and B. Harff in their 1994 book Ethnic Conflict in World Politics (Boulder) have no difficulty in classifying the violence in South Africa as ‘war’ alongside 17 other countries; see, pp. 160–6.
See, M. S. McDougal, H. D. Lasswell and L. Chen, Human Rights and World Public Order, Resolution: global New Haven and London, 1980, p. 546.
G. Simpson and P. van Zyl, ‘South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, Johannesburg, 1995, p. 12, n. 11.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, R., Shaw, M. (1998). The Dying Days of Apartheid. In: Howarth, D.R., Norval, A.J. (eds) South Africa in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26801-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26801-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26803-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26801-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)