Advertisement

An International Comparative Analysis of the State of Competition

  • Robert C. G. Haffner
  • Peter A. G. van Bergeijk

Abstract

Since the OECD initiated its structural reform programme in the 1980s, the topic of structural change has been on the agenda ofpolicy makers across the world. Motivated by the structural problems of stagflation in the 1970s, the deteriorating situation of public finance and the persistently high level of unemployment, it was increasingly recognized that ‘open and efficient markets for goods and services, exposed to domestic and international competition, provide the crucial underpinnings for dynamic, high income economies’ (OECD, 1994, p.7). Indeed, progress has been impressive in the areas of trade liberalisation and the deregulation of domestic and international financial markets, but the reform of markets for goods and services and, most notably, the labour market, was more tedious.

Keywords

Market Power Market Structure Exit Rate Import Competition Lerner Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ark, B. van (1995), “Manufacturing Prices, Productivity and Labor Costs in Five Economies,” Monthly Labor Review, Bureau of Labor Statistics, July:56–72.Google Scholar
  2. Bennenbroek, N. and R.I.D. Harris (1995), “An Investigation of the Determinants of Profitability in New Zealand Manufacturing Industries,” Applied Economics, 27:1093–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain, J.S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol, W.J., J. Panzar and R. Willig (1982), Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego.Google Scholar
  5. Bedrossian, A. and D. Moschos (1988), “Industrial Structure and the Speed of Price Adjustment,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 26:459–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeijk, P.A.G. van, and R.C.G. Haffner (1996), Privatization, Deregulation and the Macroeconomy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  7. Bergeijk, RAG. van, R.C.G. Haffner and P.M. Waasdorp (1993), “Measuring the Speed of the Invisible Hand: The Macroeconomic Costs of Price Rigidity,” Kyklos, 46:529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bresnahan, T.F. (1989), “Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power” in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of lndustrial Organization, North-Holland, Amsterdam:1011–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brozen, Y (1971), “Concentration and Structural and Market Disequilibria,” Antitrust Bulletin 16 (2):241–8.Google Scholar
  10. Carlton, D.W. and J.W. Perloff (1994), Modern Industrial Organization, Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, W.M. and RM. Levin (1989), “Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure,” in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, North-Holland, Amsterdam: 1060–107.Google Scholar
  12. Cowling, K. and M. Waterson (1976), “Price-Cost Margins and Market Structure,” Economica 43:267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cubbin, J.S. and P.A. Geroski (1990), “The Persistence of Profits in the United Kingdom,” in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:147–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Das, B.J., W.E Chappell and W.E Shughart (1993), “Advertising, Competition and Market Share Instability,” Applied Economics, 25:1409–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, S. (1988), “Concentration,” in: S. Davies and B. Lyons (eds.), The Economics of Industrial Organisation, Longman, London:73–126.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, S. and B. Lyons (eds.) (1988), The Economics of Industrial Organisation, Longman, London.Google Scholar
  17. Dijksterhuis, G.B., H.J. Heeres and A.J.M. Kleijweg (1995), “Indicatoren voor dynamiek” (Indicators of Economic Dynamism; in Dutch), Economisch-Statistische Berichten, 80: 652–7.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, R. (1983), “Industry Structure and the Speed of Price Adjustment,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 23:25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Domberger, S. (1979), “Price Adjustment and Market Structure,” Economic Journal, 98:96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donni, O. and F. Fecher (1994), “Efficiency and Productivity of the Insurance Industry in the OECD Countries,” mimeo, University of Liège, Liège.Google Scholar
  21. Eckard, E.W, (1995) “A Note on the Profit-Concentration Relation,” Applied Economics, 27:219–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Encaoua, D. and P. Geroski (1986), “Price Dynamics and Competition in Five OECD Countries,” OECD Economic Studies (6), Paris, OECD:47–74.Google Scholar
  23. Felder, F. (1995), “The Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for the Detection of Price above the Competitive Level,” Empirica, 22:103–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher, F.M. (1989), “Games Economists Play: a Noncooperative View,” RAND Journal of Economics, 20(1):113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geroski, P.A. (1991), Market Dynamics and Entry, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Geroski, P.A. and J. Schwalbach (1991), Entry and Market Contestability, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Gent, C. van, (1996) “New Dutch Competition Policy: A Revolution without Revolutionaries,” Paper presented at the Conference Economic Science: An Art or an Asset?, The Hague, January.Google Scholar
  28. Gelauff, G.M.M. and J.J. Graafland (1994), Modelling Welfare State Reform, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  29. Haffner, R.C.G. (1993), “De meting van dynamiek: een onderzoek naar de marktwerking op goedememarkten in nederland” [Measuring Market Dynamics: A Survey for Product Markets in the Netherlands], mimeo, Erasmus University, Rotterdam and Ministry of Economic Affairs, The Hague.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, R.E. (1986), “Market Structure and Macroeconomic Fluctuations,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2:285–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenny, F.Y. and A.P. Weber (1990), “The Persistence of Profits in France,” in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jong, H.W. de (1990), “Nederland: het kartelparadijs van Europa?” [The Netherlands: the Cartel Paradise of Europe?; in Dutch], Economisch-Statistische Berichten, 75:244–248.Google Scholar
  33. Khemani, R.S. and D.M. Shapiro (1990), “The Persistence of Profits in Canada,” in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kleijweg, A.J.M. and M.H.C. Lever (1994), “Entry and Exit in Dutch Manufacturing Industries,” EIM/Fundamental Research 9409/E, Zoetermeer.Google Scholar
  35. Kleijweg, A.J.M. and H.R. Nieuwenhuijsen, (1995) “Winstpersistentie in de Nederlandse Industrie (1978–91” (Persistence of Profits in Dutch Manufacturing 1978–91; in Dutch) EIM Fundamental Research, Zoetermeer.Google Scholar
  36. Kremers, J.J.M. (1991), “Naar een sterkere binnenlandse groeidynamiek,” (Towards stronger interior dynamism of growth; in Dutch) Economisch-Statistische Berichten, 76:1228–32.Google Scholar
  37. Kotler, P. (1980), Principles of Marketing, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  38. Kreps, D.M. and M.A. Spence (1985) ‘Modeling the Role of history in Industrial Organization and Competition,” in: G.I. Feiwel (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Microeconomics and Welfare, MacMillan, London:340–78.Google Scholar
  39. Kühn, K: U., P. Seabright and A. Smith (1992), “Competition Policy Research: Where Do We Stand?,” CEPR Occasional Paper 8, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  40. Love, J.H. (1995), “The Measurement of Entry Rates: Reconsideration and Resolution”, Empirica, 22:151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyons, B. (1988), “Barrlers to Entry,” in: S. Davies and B. Lyons (eds), The Economics of Industrial Organisation, Longman, London:26–72.Google Scholar
  42. MacDonald, J.M. (1994), “Does Import Competition Force Efficient Production?,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 76:721–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maggi, G. (1996), “Strategic Trade Policies with Endogenous Mode of Competition,” American Economic Review, 86:237–58.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, S. (1993), Advanced Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  45. Mueller, D.C. (1990), “The Persistence of Profits in the United States,” in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mueller, D.C. (1991), “Entry, Exit and the Competitive Process,” in: P.A. Geroski and J. Schwalbach (eds), Entry and Market Contestability. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge:1–23.Google Scholar
  47. Nieuwenhuis, A. and P.A. Terra-Pilaar (1996), “Aspecten van marktwerking in beschutte bedrijfstakken” (Aspects of Market Functioning in Sheltered Sectors; in Dutch), mimeo, CPB Netherlands Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  48. Odagiri, H. and H. Yamawaki (1990), “The Persistence of Profits: International Comparison,” in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. OECD (1993), Economic Surveys (1993)/(1994), The Netherlands, OECD, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. OECD (1994a), Assessing Structural Reform: Lessons for the Future, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  51. OECD (1994b), Employment Outlook, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  52. Okun, A.M. (1981), Prices and Quantities: A Macroeconomic Analysis, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  53. Paech, N. (1995), Die Wirkung potentieller Konkurrenz auf das Preissetzungsverhalten etablierter Firmen bei Abwesenheit strategischer Asymmetrien (The Impact of Potential Competition on Pricing Policies of Established Firms in the Absence of Strategic Asymmetries; in German), Duncker & Humblot, Berlin.Google Scholar
  54. Philips, L. (1996), “On the Detection of Collusion and Predation,” European Economic Review 40:495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roeger, W. (1995), “Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for US manufacturing,” Journal of Political Economy 103:316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ross, S.A. and M.L. Wachter (1975), “Pricing and liming Decisions in Oligopoly Industries,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89:115–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scherer, F.M. and D. Ross (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Third edition, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  58. Schmalensee, R. (1989), “Inter-industry Studies of Structure and Performance,” in: R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds.), Handbook of lndustrial Organization,: North-Holland, Amsterdam:951–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwalbach, J. and T. Mahmood (1990), “The Persistence of Profits in the Federal Republic of Germany,” in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), The Dynamics of Company Profits: An International Comparison, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge:105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sinderen, J. van (1993), “Taxation and Economic Growth,” Economic Modelling, 10:285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Weiss, C.R. (1994a), “Market Structure and Pricing Behaviour in Austrian Manufacturing,” Empirica, 21:115–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wijnstok, J.C. (1995), De snelheid van prijsaanpassing in Nederlandse sectoren (The Speed of Price Adjustment in Dutch Industries; in Dutch), Ministry of Economic Affairs and Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert C. G. Haffner
  • Peter A. G. van Bergeijk

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations