Abstract
Almost everybody agrees that the process of nuclear disarmament should continue. The question which is much more controversial is whether the process of nuclear disarmament ultimately includes an NWFW. In this study we have tried to demonstrate that an NWFW, under specific conditions, is the least dangerous option in the long term, both from the point of view of every single human being and from that of each state. Two arguments are central to this debate: the enormous ‘costs’ of nuclear deterrence in general, and the threat of nuclear proliferation in particular.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Some French politicians went further by proposing a dual-key system to with regard the American nuclear weapons in Europe. However, this seems a minority point of view. Philippe Séguin, ‘A rebuttal: Why France’s Nuclear Plan is serious’, in: The International Herald Tribune, 6 September 1995
Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, ‘Comment passer a la phase de simulation?’, in: Le Figaro, 13 October 1995.
Stuart Croft, ‘European integration, nuclear deterrence and Franco-British nuclear cooperation’, in: International Affairs, October 1996.
Speech to the Institut des Hautes Etudes de Defense Nationale, 7 September 1995. Quoted by Martin Butcher, ‘Nuclear weapons in the European Union’, in: CESD Issues in European Security, Brussels, May 1996.
Swedish Prime Minister Carlsson, in: Reuter News Reports, 6 September 1995; Pascal Boniface, ‘When testing undercuts deterrence’, in: International Herald Tribune, 13 July 1995
Dominique Moïsi, ‘The urge to be different’, in: Financial Times, 25 July 1995
Dominique Moïsi, ‘Chirac of France’, in: Foreign Affairs, November/December 1995, p. 10.
David Yost, ‘Europe and Nuclear Deterrence’, in: Survival, Autumn 1993, p. 112.
Rudi Dornbusch, ‘Euro Fantasies’, in: Foreign Affairs, September/October 1996
Milton Friedman, ‘Europa vernietigt zichzelf’, in: Trends, 21 November 1996
Charles Goodhart, ‘EMU komt er niet in 1999’, in: Financieel-Economische Tijd, 11 October 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Tom Sauer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sauer, T. (1998). Conclusion. In: Nuclear Arms Control. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26729-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26729-3_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26731-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26729-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)