Skip to main content

Frames, Frontiers and Fantasies: ‘Nasty Ladies Within’ — Marion Milner and Stevie Smith

  • Chapter
The Destructive Element

Part of the book series: Language, Discourse, Society ((LDS))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

Seventeen-months-old Christine, whose poignant ‘mums’ open Stokes’ 1947 Inside Out is in fact a child named Carol (temporarily separated from her mother in war-time) whose suffering is described in Anna Freud’s and Dorothy Burlingham’s Young Children In War-Time.3 Stokes was not alone in thinking that the themes of human nature could be found in the war nurseries. But where he finds a disquieting eloquence in Christine’s/Carol’s monotonous monologue, others were more nervous about the apparent frailty of the frontier between inside and outside: inside the head, outside in the world, inside the nursery, outside in the war. In War in the Nursery, Denise Riley quotes a leader (entitled ‘War in the Nursery’) for the British Medical Journal in 1944. The editorial notes, with due foreboding, that ‘in the years from two to five the battle between love and primitive impulse is at its height … Winnicott, Buhler, Isaacs, Bowlby and others all note the turbulent characteristics of the age … Destructive impulses let loose in the war may serve to fan the flame of aggression natural to the nursery age’.4

In the nursery, that is where to find the themes of human nature: the rest is ‘working-out’, though it be also the real music. But if we want the heart of the matter we must go back to the themes, however bare, to the matchless mental suffering, for instance, of seventeen-months-old Christine, who said: ‘Mum, mum, mum, mum, mum …’ continually in a deep voice for at least three days.

Adrian Stokes1

There is no existence of a private peace: you fight for your country or, refusing to fight, you yet fight, and directly for the enemy. That is perhaps the ultimate most horrible demand of war; the State must have your conscience.

Stevie Smith2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Stevie Smith, ‘Mosaic’ (1939), Me Again: Uncollected Writings of Stevie Smith ed. Jack Barbera and William McBrien, London: Virago, 1981, p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Laplanche and J.B. Pontalis, The Language of Psychoanalysis trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith, London: Karnac Books, 1988, p. 315.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The phrase is Christopher Isherwood’s. Isherwood used it in the foreword to Edward Upward’s The Railway Accident (1949). Reproduced in The Railway Accident and Other Stories (1969), Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972, p. 34. Cited in Peter Widdowson, ‘Between the Acts? English Fiction in the Thirties’, in Culture and Crisis in Britain in the ‘30s ed. John Clarke, Margot Heinemann, David Margolies and Carole Snee, London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1979, pp. 133–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Anna Freud, ‘Identification with the Aggressor’, The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence (1937), trans. Cecil Baines, London: Hogarth Press, 1966, pp. 117–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stevie Smith, Over the Frontier (1938), London: Virago, 1980, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.B. Pontalis, ‘The Birth and Recognition of the Self: Introducing Potential Space’, Frontiers in Psychoanalysis: Between the Dream and Psychic Pain trans. Catherine and Phillips Cullen, London: Hogarth Press, 1981, pp. 126–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marion Milner, On Not Being Able to Paint (1950), Oxford: Heinemann, 1989, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Laplanche and J.B. Pontalis, ‘Fantasy and the Origins of Sexuality’, in Formations of Fantasy ed. Victor Burgin, James Donald and Cora Kaplan, London: Methuen, 1986, pp. 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen, ‘Dreams are Completely Egoistic’, The Freudian Subject trans. Catherine Porter, London: Macmillan, 1989, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marion Milner, Some Aspects of Phantasy in Relation to General Psychology’ (1945), The Suppressed Madness of Sane Men: Forty Four Years of Exploring Psychoanalysis London: Tavistock and Routledge, 1987, p. 44. Henceforth cited as SMSM.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Anna Freud, ‘Beating Fantasies and Daydreams’ (1922), The Writings of Anna Freud vol. 1, 1922–35, London: Hogarth, 1974, p. 156.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janet Montefiore, ‘The pram in the hall: men and women writing the self in the 1930s’, Men and Women Writers of the 1930s: The Dangerous Flood of History London: Routledge, 1996, p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.H. Auden, quoted in Joanna Field (Marion Milner), A Life of One’s Own (1934), London: Virago, 1987, p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W.H. Auden, ‘The Guilty Vicarage’, The Dyer’s Hand and Other Essays (1938), London: Faber and Faber, 1962, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Christopher Caudwell, cited by Marion Milner, ‘The role of illusion in symbol formation’, p. 99. See also Christopher Caudwell, Illusion and Reality (1937), London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Georg Grosz, ‘On My Drawings’ (1944), Georg Grosz ed. Herbert Bittner, London: Peter Owen, 1965, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. For accounts of these and other reviews of Over tne Frontier see Jack Barbera and William McBrien, Stevie: A Biography of Stevie Smith London: Heinemann, 1985, pp. 110–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gérard Genette, ‘Frontiers of Narrative’, Figures of Literary Discourse trans. Alan Sheridan, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Sigmund Freud, ‘Being in Love and Hypnosis’, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1921), PFL 12, pp. 144–7, SE 18, pp. 111–16. For a discussion of the mimetic logic that underpins hypnosis, and the persistence of this logic in psychoanalysis, see Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen, ‘Hypnosis in Psychoanalysis’, Representations 27, Summer 1989, pp. 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1998 Lyndsey Stonebridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stonebridge, L. (1998). Frames, Frontiers and Fantasies: ‘Nasty Ladies Within’ — Marion Milner and Stevie Smith. In: The Destructive Element. Language, Discourse, Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26721-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics