Abstract
I have been considering interpretations of religion made by sophisticated observers. They are unlikely to be the views of the believers, for whom it will have to do with the nature of things. Frazer indeed saw religion as something to which people had recourse when magic failed, while magic was a form of proto-science based on mistaken beliefs about how things worked. Primitives of course knew that they needed to use their own skills, but the right spell or the right ju-ju could help lead to success, for instance in war, hunting or healing. Yet often it did not, and religion was then a matter of submission to more powerful agencies. The submission was to agencies which were mistakenly believed actually to exist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
E.E. Evans-Pritchard, Nuer Religion (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956).
This book showed a change of emphasis from his classic Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1937).
Robin Horton’s views will be found in a collection of his papers, Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West (Cambridge, 1993).
Philipp Frank, Between Physics & Philosophy (Cambridge, 1941).
J.N.W. Watkins, ‘Between Analytic and Empirical’, Philosophy 1957;
and ‘Confirmable and Inferential Metaphysics’, Mind 1958.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Dorothy Emmet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emmet, D. (1998). Haunted Universes. In: Outward Forms, Inner Springs. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26672-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26672-2_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26674-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26672-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)