Abstract
The complex variety of sociological theories and methods is often reduced to a series of allegedly distinctive ‘schools’, ‘traditions’ ‘styles’ or ‘approaches’ that together constitute the discipline. Some such categories have been named after individual sociologists sufficiently recognisable through fame or notoriety (for example Marxism, Durkheimianism). A second convention has rested on the invention of new terms signifying the distinctiveness of a particular approach (for example symbolic interactionism, structural functionalism). A third has invoked a geographical or institutional affiliation shared by at least the first generation of those associated with its type of work (for example Chicago School, West Coast School).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
T Burns, Erring Gofman ( London: Routledge, 1992 ).
J. Ditton (ed.), The View from Goffman ( London: Macmillan, 1980 ).
P. Drew and Anthony Wootton (eds), Erring Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988 ).
P. Manning, Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).
‘Erving Goffman’s Sociology’. Special Issue of Human Studies 12(1 and 2), (1989).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Robin Williams
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, R. (1998). Erving Goffman. In: Stones, R. (eds) Key Sociological Thinkers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26616-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26616-6_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-68767-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26616-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)