Skip to main content

Abstract

The complex variety of sociological theories and methods is often reduced to a series of allegedly distinctive ‘schools’, ‘traditions’ ‘styles’ or ‘approaches’ that together constitute the discipline. Some such categories have been named after individual sociologists sufficiently recognisable through fame or notoriety (for example Marxism, Durkheimianism). A second convention has rested on the invention of new terms signifying the distinctiveness of a particular approach (for example symbolic interactionism, structural functionalism). A third has invoked a geographical or institutional affiliation shared by at least the first generation of those associated with its type of work (for example Chicago School, West Coast School).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • T Burns, Erring Gofman ( London: Routledge, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ditton (ed.), The View from Goffman ( London: Macmillan, 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Drew and Anthony Wootton (eds), Erring Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Manning, Erving Goffman and Modern Sociology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Erving Goffman’s Sociology’. Special Issue of Human Studies 12(1 and 2), (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 Robin Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, R. (1998). Erving Goffman. In: Stones, R. (eds) Key Sociological Thinkers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26616-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics