Abstract
The beginning of perestroika in the USSR spurred all of Soviet society to take an active part in political life. The leaders of the reconstruction announced democratisation as one of their main goals, gave comparative freedom to the mass media, made contacts with foreign countries easier, and helped in the creation of a number of ‘informai’ organisations. People who were previously quite indifferent to politics felt the wind of change and began to participate in political life, being inspired with new hopes. The initial division of Soviet society was between the advocates and adversaries of perestroika – ‘democrats’ and ‘conservatives’. But when the first stage of restructuring – the destruction of the old order – dragged on, and while Soviet state leaders demonstrated an obvious inability to pass to the second, constructive stage, these two camps began to splinter into smaller ones reflecting the specifie interests of different groups of the population. In the Soviet republics the process of division took place along nationality lines. The people who assumed leadership in the democratie movements in the republics were concerned first of all with nationality problems, although they attempted to conceal them under the cloak of democracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alexander J. Motyl (ed.), Thinking Theoretically about Soviet Nationalities: History and Comparison in the Study of the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992); Zvi Gitelman (ed.), The Politics of Nationalities and the Erosion of the USSR (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1992); Alexander J. Motyl, Will the Non-Russians Rebel?: State, Ethnicity and Stability in the USSR (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987); Bohdan Nahaylo and Victor Swoboda, Soviet Disunion (New York: The Free Press, 1990).
Zvi Gitelman, Development and Ethnicity in the Soviet Union: Post-Soviet Nations; Perspectives on the Demise of the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992), p.238.
Charles King, ‘Moldova and the New Bessarabian Question’, The World Today, vol.49, no.7 (1993), pp.135-8.
Miron Rezun (ed.), Nationalism and the Breakup of an Empire: Russia and its Periphery (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1992); Ian Bremmer and Ray Taras (eds), Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993) ; Michael Rywkin, Moscow’s Lost Empire (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1994); Graham Smith (ed.), The Nationalities Question in the Former Soviet Union, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Hedrick Smith, The New Russians (New York: Random House, 1991); Anthony Hyman, ‘Russians Outside Russia’, The World Today, vol.49, no.11 (1993), pp.205-8; Paul Kolstoe, Russians in the Former Soviet Republics (Bloomington, IN, and London: Indiana University Press, 1995).
Neil Melvin, ‘Russia and the Ethnopolitics of Kazakhstan’, The World Today, vol.49, no.11 (1993), p.208.
See William Crowther, ‘The Politics of Mobilization: Nationalism and Reform in Soviet Moldavia’, Russian Review, vol.50, no.2 (1991), pp.183-202.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skvortsova, A. (1998). The Russians in Moldova: Political Orientations. In: Taras, R. (eds) National Identities and Ethnic Minorities in Eastern Europe. International Congress of Central and East Europian Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26553-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26553-4_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26555-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26553-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)