Skip to main content

Changing Landmarks? Anti-Westernism in National Bolshevik and Russian Revolutionary Thought

  • Chapter
Russian Nationalism Past and Present

Part of the book series: Studies in Russia and East Europe ((SREE))

Abstract

In 1921 a group of Russian émigrés, formerly loyal to the White cause, published under the leadership of N.V. Ustrialov a collection entitled Smena vekh or ‘Change of Landmarks’.1 The smenovekhovtsy (supporters of Smena vekh) abandoned their previous opposition to Soviet power and declared that Bolshevism was a Russian national phenomenon, the professed internationalism of which was a camouflage. Already in 1920 Ustrialov had proclaimed himself an adherent of ‘National Bolshevism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Smena vekh, reprinted in V poiskakh puti. Russkaia intelligentsiia i sud’by Rossii, comp. I.A. Isaev, Moscow, 1992, pp. 207–371.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V.I. Lenin, ‘Sotsialisticheskoe otechestvo v opasnosti!’, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii (hereafter PSS), 5th edn, 55 vols., Moscow, 1958–65, vol. 35, pp. 357–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mikhail S. Agurskii, Ideologiia natsional-bol’shevizma, foreword by Leonard Schapiro, Paris, 1980, pp. 50–6, 140–9; English expanded edn, The Third Rome: National Bolshevism in the USSR, Boulder, Colorado/London, 1987;

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.V. Utechin, Russian Political Thought: A Concise History, London, 1964, pp. 253–4,

    Google Scholar 

  5. and id., ‘Bolsheviks and their Allies after 1917: The Ideological Pattern’, Soviet Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, October 1958, pp. 131–3.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adam B. Ulam, ‘Russian Nationalism’, in Seweryn Bialer (ed.), The Domestic Context of Soviet Foreign Policy, London, 1981, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agurskii, Ideologiia (see n. 3 above).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., pp. 51–2, 224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nikolai V. Ustrialov, V bor’be za Rossiiu, Kharbin, 1920, pp. 5, 13, as cited in Agurskii, Ideologiia, pp. 64–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lenin, ‘Detskaia bolezn’ “levizny” v kommunizme’ (27 April 1920), PSS, vol. 41, p. 60; Agursky, Ideologiia, pp. 62–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Utechin, Russian Political Thought, p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Agurskii, Ideologiia, pp. 78–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Zarin, Politicheskaia maskirovka religioznykh organizatsii, Moscow, 1934, pp. 84–5,

    Google Scholar 

  14. as cited in Emanuel Sarkisyanz, Russland und der Messianismus des Orients: Sendungsbewusstsein und politischer Chiliasmus des Ostens, Tübingen, 1955, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E.H. Carr, Socialism in One Country, 1924–1926, 3 vols., Harmondsworth, 1970, vol. 1, pp. 65–76; Agurskii, Ideologiia, pp. 60–1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N.V. Ustrialov, ‘Patriotica’, in Smena vekh, reprinted in V poiskakh puti, pp. 268–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Iu.V. Kliuchnikov, ‘Smena vekh’, in Smena vekh, reprinted in V poiskakh puti, p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Ustrialov, Pod znakom revoliutsii, 2nd edn, 1927, as cited in Carr, Socialism in One Country, vol. 1, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Agurskii, Ideologiia, pp. 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dimitry V. Pospielovsky, The Russian Church under the Soviet Regime, 1917–1982, 2 vols., Crestwood, New York, 1984, vol. 1, pp. 89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lenin, ‘Politicheskii otchet Tsentral’nogo Komiteta RKP(b) 27 marta [1922]’, PSS, vol. 45, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Agurskii, Ideologiia, pp. 164–81; and id., ‘The Soviet Legitimacy Crisis and its International Implications’, in Morton A. Kaplan (ed.), The Many Faces of Communism, New York, 1978, p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leon Trotsky, Literature and Revolution, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1971, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boris Kagarlitsky, The Thinking Reed: Intellectuals and the Soviet State from 1917 to the Present, trans. Brian Pearce, London, 1989, pp. 60–3.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nicholas V. Riasanovsky, ‘The Emergence of Eurasianism’, California Slavic Studies, vol. 4, 1967, pp. 39–72; Carr, Socialism in One Country, vol. 1, pp. 71–3;

    Google Scholar 

  26. G.E. Orchard, ‘The Eurasian School of Russian Historiography’, Laurentian University Review, vol. 10, no. 1, November 1977, pp. 97–106;

    Google Scholar 

  27. Milan Hauner, What is Asia to Us? Russia’s Asian Heartland Yesterday and Today, Boston, Massachusetts, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Agurskii, Ideologiia, p. 148.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., pp. 203–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Agursky, ‘Soviet Legitimacy Crisis’, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Agurskii, Ideologiia, pp. 224–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lenin, ‘Tezisy po voprosu o nemedlennom zakliuchenii separatnogo i anneksionistskogo mira’ (7 January 1918), PSS, vol. 35, p. 250.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leon Trotsky, The Draft Programme of the Communist International: A Criticism of Fundamentals, introduction by W. Sinclair, London, 1954, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Franco Venturi, Roots of Revolution: A History of the Populist and Socialist Movements in Nineteenth-Century Russia, trans. Francis Haskell, New York, 1966, pp. 54–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The text of this draft is in Lawrence Orton, ‘Bakunin’s Plan for Slav Federation, 1848’, Canadian-American Slavic Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, Spring 1974, pp. 107–15 (pp. 113–15).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mikhail Bakunin, as cited in Vladimir C. Fišera and Gunter Minnerup, ‘Marx, Engels and the National Question’, in Eric Cahm and Vladimir C. Fišera (eds), Socialism and Nationalism, 3 vols., Nottingham, 1978–80, vol. 1, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mikhail A. Bakunin, Russkim, pol’skim i vsem slavianskim druz’iam, Geneva, 1888, p. 28,

    Google Scholar 

  38. as cited in Frank L. Fadner, Seventy Years of Pan-Slavism in Russia: Karazin to Danilevskii, 1800–1870, Washington, DC, 1952, pp. 163–5 (quotation on p. 164), 169–70.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Orton, ‘Bakunin’s Plan’ (see n. 30 above); Fadner, Seventy Years of Pan-Slavism, pp. 154–61; Venturi, Roots of Revolution, pp. 54–60; J. Caroline Cahm, ‘Bakunin’, in Socialism and Nationalism, vol. 1, pp. 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Abbott Gleason, Young Russia: The Genesis of Russian Radicalism in the 1860s, Chicago, 1983, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Aleksandr I. Herzen, ‘Dnevnik’, 6 November 1842, Sobranie sochinenii v tridtsati tomakh, Moscow, 1954–65, vol. 2, pp. 240–1.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid., 24 January 1844, p. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., 21 February 1844, p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Martin E. Malia, Alexander Herzen and the Birth of Russian Socialism, 1812–1855, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1961, pp. 300–11, 463–4; Venturi, Roots of Revolution, pp. 1–21;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Edward Acton, Alexander Herzen and the Role of the Intellectual Revolutionary, Cambridge, 1979, pp. 11–14, 19;

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jacob L. Talmon, The Myth of the Nation and the Vision of Revolution: The Origins of Intellectual Polarization in the Twentieth Century, London, 1981, pp. 257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Malia, Herzen, pp. 297–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Herzen, ‘Konstantin Sergeevich Aksakov’, 1 January 1861, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 15, pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Herzen, ‘La Russie’, 25 August 1849, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 6, pp. 162–3.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Herzen, ‘Le Peuple russe et le socialisme’, 22 September 1851, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 7, pp. 285–92 (p. 288).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Acton, Alexander Herzen, pp. 62–73, esp. p. 65; Malia, Herzen, pp. 388–415, esp. pp. 410–12; Talmon, The Myth of the Nation, pp. 259–66.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Acton, Alexander Herzen, pp. 124–6; Maximilien Rubel, ‘A Visionary Legacy to Russia’, in Rubel on Karl Marx: Five Essays, ed. Joseph O’Malley and Keith Algozin, Cambridge, 1981, pp. 254–60.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Acton, Alexander Herzen, pp. 114–78; Malia, Alexander Herzen, p. 414; Isaiah Berlin, ‘Fathers and Children: Turgenev and the Liberal Predicament’, in Russian Thinkers, (edited by Henry Hardy and Aileen Kelly), London, 1978, pp. 270–1.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Andrzej Walicki, The Controversy over Capitalism: Studies in the Social Philosophy of the Russian Populists, Oxford, 1969, pp. 1–28;

    Google Scholar 

  55. Richard Pipes, ‘Narodnichestvo: A Semantic Inquiry’, Slavic Review, vol. 23, no. 3, September 1964, pp. 441–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Walicki, The Controversy over Capitalism, pp. 18–20; Venturi, Roots of Revolution, pp. 147, 150–2, 160, 196–203; Gleason, Young Russia, pp. 185–225.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Talmon, The Myth of the Nation, p. 291–4.

    Google Scholar 

  59. James H. Billington, Mikhailovsky and Russian Populism, London, 1958, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Walicki, The Controversy over Capitalism, pp. 29–88, 107–39; Billington, Mikhailovsky, pp. 64–78; Philip Pomper, Peter Lavrov and the Russian Revolutionary Movement, Chicago, 1972, p. 45; Talmon, The Myth of the Nation, p. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Venturi, Roots of Revolution, pp. 412–28; Tibor Szamuely, The Russian Tradition, London, 1974, pp. 292–5; Walicki, The Controversy over Capitalism, pp. 96–9, 139–45.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Marx, letter to Otechestvennye zapiski, 1877, in Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Werke, 39 vols., Berlin, 1956–68 (hereafter MEW), vol. 19, pp. 107–12.

    Google Scholar 

  63. MEW, vol. 35, pp. 166–7.

    Google Scholar 

  64. MEW, vol. 19, pp. 295–6; Walicki, The Controversy over Capitalism, pp. 179–94; Neil A. Martin, ‘Marxism, Nationalism and Russia’, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 29, no. 2, May–June 1968, pp. 246–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Walicki, The Controversy over Capitalism, pp. 147–65; Bertram D. Wolfe, Three Who Made a Revolution: A Biographical History, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1966, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Iskra, no. 82, 1 January 1905, as cited in Isaac Deutscher, The Prophet Armed: Trotsky, 1879–1921, London, 1954, p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Leon Trotsky, The Permanent Revolution and Results and Prospects, trans. John G. Wright and Brian Pearce, New York, 1970, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibid., pp. 100–15.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Andrei Belyi, ‘Rodine’, Stikhotvoreniia i poemy, compiled and with an introduction by T.Iu. Khmel’nitskaia, Moscow/Leningrad, 1966, pp. 381–2.

    Google Scholar 

  70. This is expanded in Peter J.S. Duncan, ‘Ivanov-Razumnik and the Russian Revolution: From “Scythianism” to Suffocation’, Canadian Slavonic Papers, vol. 21, no. 1, March 1979, pp. 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Leonard Schapiro, ‘The Vekhi Group and the Mystique of Revolution’, Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 34, no. 82, December 1955, pp. 56–76 (p. 61).

    Google Scholar 

  72. James H. Billington, ‘The Bolshevik Debet to Russian Populism’, Occidente, vol. 12, no. 4, July–August 1956, pp. 319–27; Isaiah Berlin, ‘Introduction’ in Venturi, Roots of Revolution, pp. xxi–xxx;

    Google Scholar 

  73. David Shub, Lenin: A Biography, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1966, p. 422.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Congress of the Peoples of the East, Baku, September 1920: Stenographic Report, trans, and annotated by Brian Pearce, London, 1977 (first published Petrograd, 1920), pp. 36 (Zinoviev), 51 (Radek).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Emanuel Sarkisyanz, ‘Russian Attitudes Toward Asia’, Russian Review, vol. 13, no. 4, October 1954, pp. 245–54;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. E.H. Carr, The Bolshevik Revolution, 1917–1923, 3 vols., Harmondsworth, Middlesex, 1966, vol. 3, pp. 232–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1998 School of Slavonic and East European Studies

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duncan, P.J.S. (1998). Changing Landmarks? Anti-Westernism in National Bolshevik and Russian Revolutionary Thought. In: Hosking, G., Service, R. (eds) Russian Nationalism Past and Present. Studies in Russia and East Europe . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26532-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26532-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-26534-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26532-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics