Institutional Foundations of Robust Economic Performance: Public-Sector Industrial Growth in China

  • Victor Nee
  • Sijin Su
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


China’s economic reform was launched by fiscal decentralization, the gradual delegation of decision-making from the central state to local authorities and enterprises. The reform resulted in prodigious economic growth. From 1978 to 1991, the deflated growth rate of China’s national income was more than 10 per cent per year. By 1991, its national income was nearly three times as large as that of 1978, transforming China into the third largest economy in the world after the United States and Japan. This sustained economic growth is difficult to explain. China lacks many of the conditions that economists look for in accounting for sustained economic growth. No plan for the privatization of public property was implemented as in Eastern Europe and Russia. Private property rights remain insecure and poorly enforced. The state does not serve as a neutral third party enforcer of contracts. The monitoring and enforcement of laws and regulations are often arbitrary and inconsistent. Economic markets are intertwined with political markets in which officials secure rents in exchange for administrative favours. Such features of the institutional environment in China ought not to promote sustained economic growth according to orthodox economic reasoning (North and Thomas 1973, Eggertsson 1990). Why then has the Chinese industrial economy maintained such a spectacular rate of sustained growth?


Local Government Real Estate Market Fiscal Decentralization Industrial Firm Sustained Economic Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alchian, A. (1911), Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amsden, A. (1989), Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Che, J. and Y. Qian. (1996), ‘Understanding China’s township-village enterprises’. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  4. Eggertsson, T. (1990), Economic Behaviour and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans, P. (1995), Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kornai, J. ( 1990), On the Road to a Free Economy: Shifting from a Socialist System. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. McMillan, J. and B. Naughton (1996), ‘Reforming China’s state-owned firms’ in J. McMillan and B. Naughton (eds), Reforming Asian Socialism: the Growth of Market Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 167–74.Google Scholar
  8. Nee, V. (1992), ‘Organizational dynamics of market transition: hybrid forms, property rights, and the mixed economy in China’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nee, V. and S. Su. (1996), ‘Institutions, social ties and commitment in China’s corporatist transformation’ in J. McMillan and B. Naughton (eds), Reforming Asian Socialism: The Growth of Market Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 111–34.Google Scholar
  10. North, D.C. and R.P. Thomas (1973), The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Piore, M.J. and C.F. Sabel (1984), The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Oi, J.C. (1989), State and Peasant in Contemporary China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Oi, J.C. (1992), ‘Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China’. World Politics, 45: 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wade, R. (1990), Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Walder, A. (1995), ‘Local government as industrial firms: organizational analysis of China’s transitional economy’. American Journal of Sociology, 101: 263–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wong, C. (1987), ‘Between plan and market: the role of the local sector in Post-Mao China’. Journal of Comparative Economics, 11: 385–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wong, C. (1990), ‘Central-local relations in an era of fiscal decline: the paradox of fiscal decentralization in Post-Mao China’. The China Quarterly, 128: 691–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wong, C. (1992), ‘Fiscal reform and local industrialization’. Modern China, 18: 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Nee
  • Sijin Su

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations