On Appropriate Models for Transformation in Eastern Europe

  • Jeffrey Henderson
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

The historical rupture of 1989–91 in Eastern Europe, occasioned by the collapse of state socialism, placed on the agenda of those societies the possibility of capitalist forms of economic transformation and development. In societies that become abruptly disconnected from the relative certainties of their past — usually through war or revolution — it has often been the case that attempts to re-cast the future have involved a collective search for models of political and economic organization that promise liberation from the strictures of the past. The influence of the US political settlement subsequent to the War of Independence on the French Revolution is well known, as is the influence of the latter on liberation movements and nation-building in nineteenth century Europe, Latin America and elsewhere. For much of our own century it has been the Leninist model and the various Stalinist forms of state socialism which it engendered that has provided the guidelines for political and economic reconstruction in parts of what used to be called the ‘third world’, as well as, of course, Eastern Europe. Given their experience of state socialism, however, it was no surprise that the preferred pathway to the future for the vast majority of the post-socialist societies of Europe, involved, as fundamental components, capitalist economies and liberal-democratic state forms. From the vantage point of over a hundred years of mature industrial capitalism what was surprising, perhaps, was that the release from state socialism seems not to have been accompanied by serious reflection on the fact that capitalism, economically and politically, is far from monadic.

Keywords

Economic Transformation Shock Therapy Industrial Capitalism State Asset Industrial Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, M. (1993), Capitalism Against Capitalism. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
  2. Amsden, A.H., J. Kochanowicz and L. Taylor (1994), The Market Meets its Match: Restructuring the Economies of Eastern Europe. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appelbaum, R.P. and J. Henderson (eds) (1992), States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Dean, P. (1975), ‘War and industrialisation’ in J.M. Winter (ed.), War and Economic Development: Essays in Memory of David Joslin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 91–102.Google Scholar
  6. Gowan, P. (1995), ‘Neo-liberal theory and practice for Eastern Europe’. New Left Review, 213: 3–60.Google Scholar
  7. Gowan, P. (1996), ‘Eastern Europe, Western power and neo-liberalism’. New Left Review, 216: 129–140.Google Scholar
  8. Grabher, G. (1995), ‘The elegance of incoherence: economic transformation in East Germany and Hungary’ in E. Dittrich, G. Schmidt and R. Whitley (eds), Industrial Transformation in Europe. London: Sage Publications: 33–53.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, N. (1992), ‘States, economic development and the Asian Pacific rim’ in R.P. Appelbaum and J. Henderson (eds), States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim. Newbury Park: Sage Publications: 71–84.Google Scholar
  10. Henderson, J. (1993), ‘The role of the state in the economic transformation of East Asia’ in C. Dixon and D. Drakakis-Smith (eds), Economic and Social Development in Pacific Asia. London: Routledge: 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henderson, J. R. Whitley, G. Lengyel and L. Czaban (1995), ‘Contention and confusion in industrial transformation: dilemmas of state economic management’ in E. Dittrich, G. Schmidt and R. Whitley (eds), Industrial Transformation in Europe. London: Sage Publications: 79–108.Google Scholar
  12. Hutton, W. (1995), The State We’re In. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, C. (1988), ‘The Japanese political economy: a crisis in theory’. Ethics and International Affairs, 2: 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lloyd, J. (1996), ‘Eastern reformers and neo-marxist reviewers’. New Left Review, 216: 119–128.Google Scholar
  15. Mokyr, J. (1990), The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nolan, P. (1995), China’s Rise, Russia’s Fall: Politics, Economics and Planning in the Transition from Stalinism. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfaller, A., I. Gough and G. Therborn (eds) (1991), Can the Welfare State Compete. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Pollin, R. (1995), ‘Financial structures and egalitarian economic policy’. New Left Review, 214: 26–61.Google Scholar
  19. Porter, M.E. (1992), ‘Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system’. Harvard Business Review, September/October: 65–82.Google Scholar
  20. Qian, W.Y. (1985), The Great Inertia: Scientific Stagnation in Traditional China. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  21. Runciman, W.G. (1995), ‘The “triumph” of capitalism as a topic in the theory of social selection’. New Left Review, 210: 33–47.Google Scholar
  22. Sachs, J.D. (1990), ‘What is to be done?’. The Economist, January 13: 23–8.Google Scholar
  23. Sachs, J.D. (1995), ‘Consolidating capitalism’. Foreign Policy, 98: 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sachs, J.D. and W.T. Woo (1994), ‘Structural factors in the economic reforms of China, Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union’. Economic Policy: A European Forum, 18: 101–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seagrave, S. (1996), Lords of the Rim: The Invisible Empire of the Overseas Chinese. London: Corgi Books.Google Scholar
  26. Stark, D. (1996), ‘Recombinant property in East European capitalism’. American Journal of Sociology, 101(4): 993–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stigler, G. (1984), ‘Economics — the imperial science?’. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(3): 301–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Supple, B. (1973), ‘The state and the industrial revolution 1700–1914’ in C.M. Cipolla (ed), The Fontana Economic History of Europe Vol. III: The Industrial Revolution. London: Fontana: 301–57.Google Scholar
  29. Vartiainen, J. (1995), ‘The state and structural change: what can be learned from the successful late industrializers?’ in H.J. Chang and R. Rowthorn (eds), The Role of the State in Economic Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 137–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitley, R. (1992), Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets and Societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Whitley, R. and J. Henderson (1995), ‘Emergent capitalism: ownership, control and change in Hungarian enterprises’ in H. Rudolf (ed.), WZB Jahrbuch 1995. Berlin: Edition Sigma: 285–306.Google Scholar
  32. Whitley, R., J. Henderson, G. Lengyel and L. Czaban (1996), ‘Continuity and change in an emergent market economy: the limited transformation of large enterprises in Europe’ in R. Whitley and P.H. Kristensen (eds), The Changing European Firm. London: Routledge: 210–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jeffrey Henderson 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Henderson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations