Abstract
Theatre in the period immediately after the Restoration was strongly supported by Charles II and his Court. The two men, Killigrew and D’Avenant, who were awarded the new theatrical patents had been exiled in France with Charles, and the titles of the companies they formed, the King’s and the Duke’s, bore testament to the strong links. It is no surprise, then, that the plays that were performed by these companies reflected the values of the world of the Court and its environs. But they did so in ways that are more complicated than is now generally perceived for this period of theatrical history. We are now accustomed to thinking of the period almost entirely in terms of its comedies, but the variety of theatrical models on offer was initially much wider than that, and indeed the play with which D’Avenant introduced his Duke’s Company, The Siege of Rhodes (1661), was the first of many heroic plays of the period, a form of drama described by Harbage as being preoccupied with a notion of virtue that was ‘purely aristocratic, limiting the quality to the traits of epic heroes: physical courage, prowess in arms, magnanimity, and fidelity to a code of personal honour’.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Arthur Harbage, Cavalier Drama: An Historical and Critical Supplement to the Study of the Elizabethan and Restoration Stage (New York: Modern Language Review, 1936), p. 55.
Laura Brown, English Dramatic Form, 1660–1760: An Essay in Generic History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981), p. 4.
cf. Edward Langhans, ‘The Theatres’, in R. D. Hulmes (ed.), The London Theatre World, 1660–1800 (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1980), p. 62.
cf. Hellinger, A Short View, pp. lxxviif.; and for an earlier consideration of the theme, J. W. Krutch, Comedy and Conscience after the Restoration (1924) (New York; Columbia University Press, 1961).
Dudley Bahlman, The Moral Revolution of 1688 (London: Oxford University Press, 1957), p. 14.
Rae Blanchard (ed.), Tracts and Pamphlets (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1944), p. 311.
cf. Jacqueline Pearson, The Prostituted Muse: Images of Women and Women Dramatists 1642–1737 (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1988), pp. 39–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1998 John Bull
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bull, J. (1998). The Moral Reform Movement, Love’s Last Shift and Changing Sensibilities. In: Vanbrugh & Farquhar. English Dramatists. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26508-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26508-4_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-46233-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-26508-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)